what's your point?Care4all so basically you are completely ignoring the very clear header that notes that it is purely that one guys opinion. Gotcha...
Any one writing about it after the fact that was not there is giving what you call, 'their opinion' on it...?
That doesn't mean that it is not an informed opinion taken from reading the papers and notes from the group of 11 that created the college of electors....
Do you have a countering opinion from someone that made it in to the Federal Election Commission's history archives? I'd be happy to read it, if you do!