Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here again you seem to be at a loss for understanding simple English. I said nothing about them not being allowed to say anything they want. Just pointing out that they were extremely wrong and chances are it was on purposeYup, first amendment, they can say and signed whatever they want. Not censorship. Actually the opposite. Try again.
Here's one reason.
Comer says Kushner ‘crossed the line of ethics’ with Saudi deal
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, “crossed the line of ethics” by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...r-crossed-the-line-of-ethics-with-saudi-deal/
That makes a huge distinction between Jared and Hunter since Hunter did not serve in a government position.
Analysis of Hunter Biden's hard drive shows he, his firm took in about $11 million from 2013 to 2018, spent it fast
“No government ethics rules apply to him,”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...hows-firm-took-11-million-2013-2018-rcna29462
We've been through all this of course. Repubs are using Hunter as a proxy to smear Joe even though they haven't provided any credible evidence Joe benefitted from Hunter's unethical behavior making money to support his drug habit and lavish lifestyle.
Here's another reason.
Grand Jury Returns Indictment Charging FBI Confidential Human Source with Felony False Statement and Obstruction Crimes
Today, a federal court unsealed a two-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Central District of California charging Alexander Smirnov, 43, with making a false statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and creating a false and fictitious record, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, for statements he made that were recorded in an official record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) known as a Form 1023.
https://www.justice.gov/sco-weiss/p...ng-fbi-confidential-human-source-felony-false
In lieu of actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe, Repubs are now raising a stink about not having the audio tape of the Hur/Biden interview. Even though they've been given Hur's report and the transcript of the interview. They've weaponized congressional committees they control and are trying to get cover for it by accusing Biden of weaponizing the DoJ even as his son is being prosecuted by a Repub SC.
And yet here is where House Repub disinformation comes in. They claimed, without credible evidence, that the letter was orchestrated by the WH. So add that to the pile of lies circulating among conservatives surrounding the laptop.Here again you seem to be at a loss for understanding simple English. I said nothing about them not being allowed to say anything they want. Just pointing out that they were extremely wrong and chances are it was on purpose
And yet over 50 so called experts were not only wrong but never said a single word about them being wrong. Funny how a lot of democrats keep trying to make up things to distract from the laptop, Biden’s quid pro quo. And now do not prosecute Hunter for gun charges yet we need more stringent gun laws.And yet here is where House Repub disinformation comes in. They claimed, without credible evidence, that the letter was orchestrated by the WH. So add that to the pile of lies circulating among conservatives surrounding the laptop.
Nope, it’s real and in courtThe implication you refer to is fabricated Repub fiction.
If you knew what the letter said you'd know they have no reason to retract it.And yet over 50 so called experts were not only wrong but never said a single word about them being wrong. Funny how a lot of democrats keep trying to make up things to distract from the laptop, Biden’s quid pro quo. And now do not prosecute Hunter for gun charges yet we need more stringent gun laws.
Prove it or STFU.
What appears to be happening here is after the total collapse of the voter fraud narrative, right wing media needed to find another baseless fraud to foment among the minions in order to keep stringing them along. It is unacceptable after flogging the notion Trump actually won the election to admit that he didn't. So here comes the Hunter laptop fantasy. Providing The Following with another lunatic rationale to cling to so they can hold on to their perceived aggrievement.
Why should anyone let ho of the laptop?That's not what the trial is about.
Why can't the Repubs let go of the laptop?
That’s fine. You were replying to a post claiming censorship. It sounded like you were agreeing and supporting the argument. If not then I’d think you would have stated disagreement with the censorship claim.Here again you seem to be at a loss for understanding simple English. I said nothing about them not being allowed to say anything they want. Just pointing out that they were extremely wrong and chances are it was on purpose
Look at the hack OP selectively choosing when to agree with an opinion offered by Comer.Here's one reason.
Comer says Kushner ‘crossed the line of ethics’ with Saudi deal
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, “crossed the line of ethics” by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...r-crossed-the-line-of-ethics-with-saudi-deal/
That makes a huge distinction between Jared and Hunter since Hunter did not serve in a government position.
Analysis of Hunter Biden's hard drive shows he, his firm took in about $11 million from 2013 to 2018, spent it fast
“No government ethics rules apply to him,”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...hows-firm-took-11-million-2013-2018-rcna29462
We've been through all this of course. Repubs are using Hunter as a proxy to smear Joe even though they haven't provided any credible evidence Joe benefitted from Hunter's unethical behavior making money to support his drug habit and lavish lifestyle.
Here's another reason.
Grand Jury Returns Indictment Charging FBI Confidential Human Source with Felony False Statement and Obstruction Crimes
Today, a federal court unsealed a two-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Central District of California charging Alexander Smirnov, 43, with making a false statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and creating a false and fictitious record, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, for statements he made that were recorded in an official record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) known as a Form 1023.
https://www.justice.gov/sco-weiss/p...ng-fbi-confidential-human-source-felony-false
In lieu of actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe, Repubs are now raising a stink about not having the audio tape of the Hur/Biden interview. Even though they've been given Hur's report and the transcript of the interview. They've weaponized congressional committees they control and are trying to get cover for it by accusing Biden of weaponizing the DoJ even as his son is being prosecuted by a Repub SC.
Show me where no one with a political agenda did not ask them to write or sign it. I am well aware what it said you even quoted it or do you forget that fast?If you knew what the letter said you'd know they have no reason to retract it.
Keep whistling. That graveyard is getting longer every day.No it doesn't. That's the point.
