Why can't the Repubs let go of the laptop?

[berg80]

Because you corrupt MF'ers LIED straight to the American people's face about it to RIG an election that's why.

Let's put that highly dubious assertion aside for a moment. Unless you want to try to prove it.

Explain to me why I should care about anything found on Hunter's laptop since it is not incriminating for his dad.

 

[jc456]

Your evidence?

the 50 plus agents of the FBI that said it?

50 former intelligence officials warn NY Post story sounds like Russian disinformation

More than 50 former intelligence officials said emails alleged to have been found on a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden show signs of a Russian disinformation operation.Several of the signers …

thehill.com

 

[jc456]

Let's put that highly dubious assertion aside for a moment. Unless you want to try to prove it.

Explain to me why I should care about anything found on Hunter's laptop since it is not incriminating for his dad.

prove what? it was during the 2020 campaign and interfered with the release of the laptop! what is it you don't understand about cover up interference?

 

[berg80]

Biden's son is on trial in a gun related felony........

........that rarely if ever results in charges being filed.

WASHINGTON — The charges brought against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden are rarely prosecuted, legal experts say.

Hunter Biden was charged Thursday with three felony gun-related counts, including possession of a firearm by a person who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance." Under a plea deal that later fell apart, Biden was also charged with two misdemeanor charges of failing to pay taxes, which he later reimbursed; those charges are not included in Thursday's indictment.

The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists.

Legal experts say the charges against Hunter Biden are rarely brought

The federal statute making it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a gun faces court challenges. The tax charges central to a now-tossed plea deal also rarely result in jail time.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[jc456]

........that rarely if ever results in charges being filed.

WASHINGTON — The charges brought against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden are rarely prosecuted, legal experts say.

Hunter Biden was charged Thursday with three felony gun-related counts, including possession of a firearm by a person who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance." Under a plea deal that later fell apart, Biden was also charged with two misdemeanor charges of failing to pay taxes, which he later reimbursed; those charges are not included in Thursday's indictment.

The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists.

Legal experts say the charges against Hunter Biden are rarely brought

The federal statute making it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a gun faces court challenges. The tax charges central to a now-tossed plea deal also rarely result in jail time.

www.nbcnews.com

Amazing the loyalty you have with creepy and his family. You must get kickbacks huh?

 

[berg80]

the 50 plus agents of the FBI that said it?

50 former intelligence officials warn NY Post story sounds like Russian disinformation

More than 50 former intelligence officials said emails alleged to have been found on a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden show signs of a Russian disinformation operation.Several of the signers …

thehill.com

That proves my point, not the poster's false assertion.

 

[berg80]

Amazing the loyalty you have with creepy and his family.

I really don't care what his son has done since it has no bearing on Joe's presidency. Past, present, or future.

 

[berg80]

prove what? it was during the 2020 campaign and interfered with the release of the laptop! what is it you don't understand about cover up interference?

Explain to me why I should care about anything found on Hunter's laptop since it is not incriminating for his dad.

 

[jc456]

Explain to me why I should care about anything found on Hunter's laptop since it is not incriminating for his dad.

because it implied wrong doing with creepy who was running against trump!!! the fact you can't figure that piece out is all anyone needs to know that you aren't smart enough for this discussion.

 

[jc456]

I really don't care what his son has done since it has no bearing on Joe's presidency. Past, present, or future.

ukraine quid pro quo was all about his son you fking idiot. Burisma

but trump's son in law, oh holy fkster buddy can't have that!!!!!

 

[Independent thinker]

Here's one reason.

Comer says Kushner ‘crossed the line of ethics’ with Saudi deal

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, “crossed the line of ethics” by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...r-crossed-the-line-of-ethics-with-saudi-deal/

That makes a huge distinction between Jared and Hunter since Hunter did not serve in a government position.

Analysis of Hunter Biden's hard drive shows he, his firm took in about $11 million from 2013 to 2018, spent it fast

“No government ethics rules apply to him,”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...hows-firm-took-11-million-2013-2018-rcna29462

We've been through all this of course. Repubs are using Hunter as a proxy to smear Joe even though they haven't provided any credible evidence Joe benefitted from Hunter's unethical behavior making money to support his drug habit and lavish lifestyle.

Here's another reason.

Grand Jury Returns Indictment Charging FBI Confidential Human Source with Felony False Statement and Obstruction Crimes

Today, a federal court unsealed a two-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Central District of California charging Alexander Smirnov, 43, with making a false statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and creating a false and fictitious record, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, for statements he made that were recorded in an official record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) known as a Form 1023.
https://www.justice.gov/sco-weiss/p...ng-fbi-confidential-human-source-felony-false

In lieu of actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe, Repubs are now raising a stink about not having the audio tape of the Hur/Biden interview. Even though they've been given Hur's report and the transcript of the interview. They've weaponized congressional committees they control and are trying to get cover for it by accusing Biden of weaponizing the DoJ even as his son is being prosecuted by a Repub SC.

LOL. Well, Democrats and the left and their lefty media tried not to talk about it, even getting over 50 agents to claim it was all misinformation by the Russians.

 

[berg80]

it was during the 2020 campaign and interfered with the release of the laptop!

You can't just keep making claims without substantiating them. How about one?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Here's one reason.

Comer says Kushner ‘crossed the line of ethics’ with Saudi deal

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Jared Kushner, former President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser while in office, “crossed the line of ethics” by accepting a $2 billion investment from the Saudi government in his private investment firm six months after he left the White House.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...r-crossed-the-line-of-ethics-with-saudi-deal/

That makes a huge distinction between Jared and Hunter since Hunter did not serve in a government position.

Analysis of Hunter Biden's hard drive shows he, his firm took in about $11 million from 2013 to 2018, spent it fast

“No government ethics rules apply to him,”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...hows-firm-took-11-million-2013-2018-rcna29462

We've been through all this of course. Repubs are using Hunter as a proxy to smear Joe even though they haven't provided any credible evidence Joe benefitted from Hunter's unethical behavior making money to support his drug habit and lavish lifestyle.

Here's another reason.

Grand Jury Returns Indictment Charging FBI Confidential Human Source with Felony False Statement and Obstruction Crimes

Today, a federal court unsealed a two-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in the Central District of California charging Alexander Smirnov, 43, with making a false statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and creating a false and fictitious record, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, for statements he made that were recorded in an official record of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) known as a Form 1023.
https://www.justice.gov/sco-weiss/p...ng-fbi-confidential-human-source-felony-false

In lieu of actual evidence of wrongdoing by Joe, Repubs are now raising a stink about not having the audio tape of the Hur/Biden interview. Even though they've been given Hur's report and the transcript of the interview. They've weaponized congressional committees they control and are trying to get cover for it by accusing Biden of weaponizing the DoJ even as his son is being prosecuted by a Repub SC.

Why are you so worried?

 

[berg80]

LOL. Well, Democrats and the left and their lefty media tried not to talk about it, even getting over 50 agents to claim it was all misinformation by the Russians.

Wrong again. The suggestion made by Gym Jordan that the letter was orchestrated by the admin has been refuted in sworn testimony by former acting CIA director Morell.

House GOP’s latest Hunter Biden laptop theory is less than meets the eye​

The Jordan-Turner letter connects this to social media companies blocking or limiting the sharing of the story, saying of the Oct. 19 statement, “Social media companies simultaneously restricted access to the [New York] Post story.”

But the letter appears to have omitted key context, including whether Blinken actually pushed for such a statement.

On Friday afternoon, House Democrats released an excerpt from Morell’s interview in which Morell actually addressed that. Asked whether Blinken had directed, suggested or insinuated that he should write such a statement, Morell said, “My memory is that he did not.”

“Mr. Morell testified that Mr. Blinken did not hint that the Biden campaign ‘could use some help on this’ or suggest that Mr. Morell should ‘cook up something’ that the campaign should use,” the House Judiciary Democrats said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/21/hunter-biden-laptop-jim-jordan/

 

[berg80]

because it implied wrong doing with creepy who was running against trump!!! the fact you can't figure that piece out is all anyone needs to know that you aren't smart enough for this discussion.

The implication you refer to is fabricated Repub fiction.

 

[Slade3200]

Democrat after democrat after Ffing democrat came out and said the Hunter Biden laptop was a Putin creation, and then proceeded to censor the media and prevent people from talking about it before the last election

That’s a lie. Democrats didn’t censor the media. Please be more honest in the future

 

[Slade3200]

Why can't the GOP let go of the laptop?

Where to begin?

Democrat after democrat after Ffing democrat came out and said the Hunter Biden laptop was a Putin creation, and then proceeded to censor the media and prevent people from talking about it before the last election

Then after the election, after Dingleberry won, it turns out that close to 20% of the voters said they would have not voted for Biden had they known.

Idiot.
As you were.

View attachment 960167

Your fake number about 20% changing their vote if they knew about the laptop is BS as well.

There have been zero legal charges stemming from the laptop. Zero impeachment hearings. It’s all political fluff at this point. You do play puppet well though

 

[Slade3200]

As I said, your an idiot.

Twitter, for example censoring the Hunter Biden scandal became known after it was taken over by Musk.

But I'm sure you think that evidence is a Putin conspiracy as well

As I said, your an idiot. You either are totally clueless or your just a lying troll.\

Which is it?

Twitter is a private company. They can censor whatever they want. They weren’t forced by democrats. Got anything else?

 

[Slade3200]

Can’t forget all those “ security specialists” that signed a letter claiming it was Russian misinformation. MSN and CNN running stories hourly about the letter. Those on this forum claiming that it had to be Russian misinformation

Yup, first amendment, they can say and signed whatever they want. Not censorship. Actually the opposite. Try again.

 

[Slade3200]

As I said, any facts that run contrary to your head up your ass will be ignored and labeled disinformation.

The fact remains, the information was suppressed as Russian disinformation.

Why?

Twitter,and other news outlets, did not report on it

Meanwhile, the same news outlets reported on the Putin Russian collusion scandal 24/7 for 3 long years using taxpayer funds, only to come up short and not even have enough evidence to impeach Trump with.

There is no way to dispute these facts idiot.

They are private companies. They Can “report” whatever they want. I can show many opposite cases of right wing companies suppressing negative Trump news. That isn’t government censorship it is capitalism and a free market