Why Did, And Why Do, So Many Self-Proclaimed Conservative Side w/Rush On Sandra Fluke

Yes, I did read what she said.

Planned Parenthood's funding has been cut to the point where they can't just hand out free contraceptives to anyone who asks for them, without need. These are, as you pointed out, women who paid $30K for college tuition which includes medical insurance.

Georgetown is a top 10 law school, which means, having a better chance of getting hired on graduation. It is a school which students will mortgage their souls to get into, and not a school you attend just because your daddy's rich. So yes, for students working their way through law school, having to jump through additional hoops for the insurance company to provide those BCP's are for your tumours and not so you can have sex for fun, is a real problem.

Not to mention, male law students don't have to deal with this crap.

Bullshit. No wonder you would be proud if your daughter lied, you are not teaching her dig for the facts and find the truth. You prefer a daughter that parrots your talking points without thinking. The women who fought for their rights a century ago would be ashamed if they could see what has become of their efforts.

Take a look at the numbers and show me how the fact that Planned Parenthood is reporting record levels of government support somehow proves their funding has been cut. This year 45% of their budget comes from taxes.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/annual-report-4661.htm

By the way, what makes you think male students don't have to deal with the imaginary funding cuts if they stop by Planned Parenthood to get free condoms?

Because no male ever needs a doctor visit and prescription for a condom, is why. Try to get a month's supply of BC pills without an Rx.

Regards from Rosie
 
[
your snobbery is showing...

what was Biden before he became Vice President? nothing but a career politician..Palin was a mayor and then ELECTED Governor with a 80% approval rating..

give me a community college person any day than some buffoon career Politician
but I'm beginning to believe liberal Democrats could run a goat for office and they would vote for it as long as it had a D next to it's name

Palin got elected in Alaska (which shouldn't even be a state) because she was a nice compliant thing that would go along with what the oil companies wanted to do up there. And, oh, yeah, she quit to go do reality TV. Before that she was the Mayor of Alaska's Crystal Meth Capital.

Meanwhile, Senator Biden had spent 30 years doing the hard work in the Senate of passing legislation.

So, really, your "but...but...but Biden" schtick is getting old. People are going to remember Biden long after they forgot old, what's her name? Tina Fey?


you should talk about, schtick...you are the expert on it
as for the "big oil" in Alaska, you bet your ass, and the profits from it is given back to the people who live there in a thing called, the permanent fund...Too bad your all's state don't think as much of you

Maybe the folks in Alaska need to see what happens to a region when the oil dries up...
 
Fine then, point out any way Rush personally attacked Fluke after his apology where he admitted he was wrong for personally attacking her.

Funny -- when I demanded documentation, I got this:
If I had just made the point, and never previously defended it, you could claim victory. On the other hand, since I have already made, and defended, the point, it is your job to refute it.

-- haven't you heard? It's your job to refute. Can't say you didn't get the memo-- you wrote the memo.

And, if you keep reading, you will see I ended up pointing out the exact lies she made when previous posters came into this thread and tried to spread their lies.

You loose.

No, I tight. You loose. Watch, I show you.

Here what you loosely wrote:
Are you saying she did not claim that 40% of Georgetown students cannot afford birth control? Because I can fucking prove that is exactly what she said. I use the fact that you can get it free from Planned Parenthood, can get free condoms everywhere, and that the pill is available for less than $10 a month to illustrate that she was lying.

Here what Sandra Fluke actually say:
Without insurance coverage contraception can cost a woman over $3000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.


Different. You try water statement down to mean something it not mean. You not "fucking prove" squat. Ergo you loose, me tight. Pogo punch holes in you post like loose leaf paper. It fun.

:Boom2:
 
Last edited:
you people didn't get that upset when Maher called Palin a cxxt..or Letterman said she looked like a slutty flight attendant..you people are such phonies

Palin is a politician and a public figure.

My problem with Palin is how someone that stupid could be a public figure in this country, or rise to national prominance before everyone got the joke.

cariboubarbie1.jpg

you don't seem to mind all the stupid people in the Democrat party..how funny
Biden makes Palin look like a genius

What would someone who calls it the "Democrat" party know about genius?
 
Palin is a politician and a public figure.

My problem with Palin is how someone that stupid could be a public figure in this country, or rise to national prominance before everyone got the joke.

cariboubarbie1.jpg

you don't seem to mind all the stupid people in the Democrat party..how funny
Biden makes Palin look like a genius

What would someone who calls it the "Democrat" party know about genius?

Ruh-roh, dead giveaway there. That's a Limblob invention. :lmao:
They love to protest "oh but I don't listen to him" and then they leave these clues like land mines ::blam:: ::blam::
"Who, me?"
:lmao:
 
Yes, I did read what she said.

Planned Parenthood's funding has been cut to the point where they can't just hand out free contraceptives to anyone who asks for them, without need. These are, as you pointed out, women who paid $30K for college tuition which includes medical insurance.

Georgetown is a top 10 law school, which means, having a better chance of getting hired on graduation. It is a school which students will mortgage their souls to get into, and not a school you attend just because your daddy's rich. So yes, for students working their way through law school, having to jump through additional hoops for the insurance company to provide those BCP's are for your tumours and not so you can have sex for fun, is a real problem.

Not to mention, male law students don't have to deal with this crap.

Bullshit. No wonder you would be proud if your daughter lied, you are not teaching her dig for the facts and find the truth. You prefer a daughter that parrots your talking points without thinking. The women who fought for their rights a century ago would be ashamed if they could see what has become of their efforts.

Take a look at the numbers and show me how the fact that Planned Parenthood is reporting record levels of government support somehow proves their funding has been cut. This year 45% of their budget comes from taxes.

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/annual-report-4661.htm

By the way, what makes you think male students don't have to deal with the imaginary funding cuts if they stop by Planned Parenthood to get free condoms?

Because no male ever needs a doctor visit and prescription for a condom, is why. Try to get a month's supply of BC pills without an Rx.

Regards from Rosie

Aren't you the girl who praised the other people for posting facts when they didn't? Do you really want to tr and argue from a snarky perspective now, because I am a antural born smart ass.
 
Funny -- when I demanded documentation, I got this:


-- haven't you heard? It's your job to refute. Can't say you didn't get the memo-- you wrote the memo.

And, if you keep reading, you will see I ended up pointing out the exact lies she made when previous posters came into this thread and tried to spread their lies.

You loose.

No, I tight. You loose. Watch, I show you.

Here what you loosely wrote:
Are you saying she did not claim that 40% of Georgetown students cannot afford birth control? Because I can fucking prove that is exactly what she said. I use the fact that you can get it free from Planned Parenthood, can get free condoms everywhere, and that the pill is available for less than $10 a month to illustrate that she was lying.

Here what Sandra Fluke actually say:
Without insurance coverage contraception can cost a woman over $3000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.


Different. You try water statement down to mean something it not mean. You not "fucking prove" squat. Ergo you loose, me tight. Pogo punch holes in you post like loose leaf paper. It fun.

:Boom2:

Are you trying to tell me that struggling financially actually means they can afford it? Because, if that is what you are saying, then you just called Fluke a liar.
 
Feel free to point out any personal attacks I made on her. Failing that, you could just shut the fuck up.
I was referring to Lush Rimbaugh my friend, not you. Take it easy big fella.

Fine then, point out any way Rush personally attacked Fluke after his apology where he admitted he was wrong for personally attacking her.
I'm gonna pull a Cain...

I don't have the facts to back it up, but, to my recollection, he went on to do a few more jabs at Sandra Fluke even after the so-called apology.

I'm not prone to go digging for that info though, however, it's how I recall things to have happened.
 
Funny -- when I demanded documentation, I got this:


-- haven't you heard? It's your job to refute. Can't say you didn't get the memo-- you wrote the memo.

And, if you keep reading, you will see I ended up pointing out the exact lies she made when previous posters came into this thread and tried to spread their lies.

You loose.

No, I tight. You loose. Watch, I show you.

Here what you loosely wrote:
Are you saying she did not claim that 40% of Georgetown students cannot afford birth control? Because I can fucking prove that is exactly what she said. I use the fact that you can get it free from Planned Parenthood, can get free condoms everywhere, and that the pill is available for less than $10 a month to illustrate that she was lying.

Here what Sandra Fluke actually say:
Without insurance coverage contraception can cost a woman over $3000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.


Different. You try water statement down to mean something it not mean. You not "fucking prove" squat. Ergo you loose, me tight. Pogo punch holes in you post like loose leaf paper. It fun.

:Boom2:

Pogo dear, a splurt alert would be nice! My coffee has beaucoup sugar. LOL!

Will those who are often offering tissues please hand me a few? TYVM!

Regards from Rosie
 
And, if you keep reading, you will see I ended up pointing out the exact lies she made when previous posters came into this thread and tried to spread their lies.

You loose.

No, I tight. You loose. Watch, I show you.

Here what you loosely wrote:
Are you saying she did not claim that 40% of Georgetown students cannot afford birth control? Because I can fucking prove that is exactly what she said. I use the fact that you can get it free from Planned Parenthood, can get free condoms everywhere, and that the pill is available for less than $10 a month to illustrate that she was lying.

Here what Sandra Fluke actually say:
Without insurance coverage contraception can cost a woman over $3000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.


Different. You try water statement down to mean something it not mean. You not "fucking prove" squat. Ergo you loose, me tight. Pogo punch holes in you post like loose leaf paper. It fun.

:Boom2:

Are you trying to tell me that struggling financially actually means they can afford it? Because, if that is what you are saying, then you just called Fluke a liar.

Are you actually going to dip into the dumpster of denialism to defy the meaning of words in the English language to the point where "report struggling financially" (verb: report) and "cannot afford" (verb: can) are the same thing?

That very loose indeed. Why you play loose with facts?
Because you loose, dat why.
 
Last edited:
When citizen Sandra Fluke's story first hit the media the response from Rush was to INSTANTLY and IMMEDIATELY attack her. He distorted her words and message to say that she wants the government to pay for her to have sex. He went as far as suggesting that we all should watch her have sex. He literally went THAT far.

The worst part of the story isn't how disgusting that fat slob and bastard is, but that there was not ONE Republican, not one self-proclaimed Conservative, not one fundamentalist RW Christian that stood up against Rush and that reprehensible message. What we saw instead were many RWers who immediately began parroting him and that bigoted message. On this very board even...and quite recently too.

I mean, do you really agree with that? Do you REALLY believe that Sara Fluke believes in having the government pay for her to have sex? Do you side with Rush in wanting to see her have sex, since, in your minds, you are already paying for it, so you might as well be able to watch it <--- that was his reasoning by the way.

Edit: He even called the girl a slut on national radio, for at least 4 days straight...no apologies.

Has The Republican Party sunk so low?

Why?!?!??

We side with him because he was right about her. She was a prop thrown up there by the Dems for their own agenda. He was being facetious when talking of Fluke:

RUSH: What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We're the pimps. (interruption) The johns? We would be the johns? No! We're not the johns. (interruption) Yeah, that's right. Pimp's not the right word. Okay, so she's not a slut. She's "round heeled." I take it back.

Was he wrong on his facts? No, he wasn't. She was there to testify that contraception should be paid for. So he made a joke about it, whoopty shit. Anyone that's going to Congress to testify isn't just some innocent private citizen, she was a political hack putting on a show for her Democrat masters.

So please, grow a fucking pair and stop acting like you're still butt-hurt about Rush's jokes on Sandra "the Slut" Fluke.
 
Was he wrong on his facts? No, he wasn't. She was there to testify that contraception should be paid for. So he made a joke about it, whoopty shit. Anyone that's going to Congress to testify isn't just some innocent private citizen, she was a political hack putting on a show for her Democrat masters.

He said she wanted the government to pay for her contraception.

She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.

That was and is a complete lie. She wanted the health care, which she paid for in her $30,000 per year tuition, and which she had no choice but to accept, to pay for her contraception. I don't think that's being unreasonable.

And no she is not a slut, but you're definitely an asshole.
 
Last edited:
When citizen Sandra Fluke's story first hit the media the response from Rush was to INSTANTLY and IMMEDIATELY attack her. He distorted her words and message to say that she wants the government to pay for her to have sex. He went as far as suggesting that we all should watch her have sex. He literally went THAT far.

The worst part of the story isn't how disgusting that fat slob and bastard is, but that there was not ONE Republican, not one self-proclaimed Conservative, not one fundamentalist RW Christian that stood up against Rush and that reprehensible message. What we saw instead were many RWers who immediately began parroting him and that bigoted message. On this very board even...and quite recently too.

I mean, do you really agree with that? Do you REALLY believe that Sara Fluke believes in having the government pay for her to have sex? Do you side with Rush in wanting to see her have sex, since, in your minds, you are already paying for it, so you might as well be able to watch it <--- that was his reasoning by the way.

Edit: He even called the girl a slut on national radio, for at least 4 days straight...no apologies.

Has The Republican Party sunk so low?

Why?!?!??

We side with him because he was right about her. She was a prop thrown up there by the Dems for their own agenda. He was being facetious when talking of Fluke:

RUSH: What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We're the pimps. (interruption) The johns? We would be the johns? No! We're not the johns. (interruption) Yeah, that's right. Pimp's not the right word. Okay, so she's not a slut. She's "round heeled." I take it back.

Was he wrong on his facts? No, he wasn't. She was there to testify that contraception should be paid for. So he made a joke about it, whoopty shit. Anyone that's going to Congress to testify isn't just some innocent private citizen, she was a political hack putting on a show for her Democrat masters.

So please, grow a fucking pair and stop acting like you're still butt-hurt about Rush's jokes on Sandra "the Slut" Fluke.

Apparently someone's not entirely clear on the distinction between a "joke" and "character assassination".

Just for a starter-hint, "jokes" do not go on for three days.
Duh.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1oOjKQflN0]53 of Rush Limbaugh's most vile smears against Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke - YouTube[/ame]

"Was he wrong about the facts?" Just for one example at 6:31: "It was Sandra Fluke who said that she was having so much sex she can't afford it.". No, it was not, because Fluke never talked about herself; it was Rash Pimpjob who said that, and no one else. Do me a favor and count up how many times he repeats the same lie, because I can't sit through it.

Had Limblob's rant actually been about the issue of funding sources of contraception, that would be the issue remembered and discussed. It wasn't. Limblob as usual makes it a personal fantasy, spewing his ad hominem all over Fluke (and others, e.g. Nancy Pelosi) so that the issue that remains, even now a year later, is the personal attack by the fake morals of a man on his fourth wife who was busted coming back from the DR with a stash of Viagra.

Only a misogynist could possibly defend that level of self-indulgent subhumanoid hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
I repeat again, Fluke was asking that the medical insurance which students at Georgetown pay for as part of their tuition, include contraception, no questions asked. The Catholic Church wanted to exclude contraception from the insurance, which would give the Church an exception under the ACA, and Fluke argued against it on behalf of Georgetown's female students. That to ask female students to pay for contraception, over and above tuition which is double the cost of state universities, was a hardship for many students, especially those women who needed the BCP's to treat painful cysts, and other conditions which have nothing to do with contraception.

But that's not what Rush said happened at all. He said that this woman wanted the government to pay her to have sex. It was Rush who went off on this middle-aged man/schoolgirl fantasy trip. Sandra Fluke went to the Senate and talked about women's health issues, and Rush Limbaugh lied about what she said and turned the whole thing into a monologue about slutty co-eds.

Those of you here who claim he was right have no idea what Fluke said, nor do you care. You just wanna have a go at one them femi-nazis.
 
Last edited:
I was referring to Lush Rimbaugh my friend, not you. Take it easy big fella.

Fine then, point out any way Rush personally attacked Fluke after his apology where he admitted he was wrong for personally attacking her.
I'm gonna pull a Cain...

I don't have the facts to back it up, but, to my recollection, he went on to do a few more jabs at Sandra Fluke even after the so-called apology.

I'm not prone to go digging for that info though, however, it's how I recall things to have happened.

No facts, just your bigotry.

At least you admit it.
 
No, I tight. You loose. Watch, I show you.

Here what you loosely wrote:


Here what Sandra Fluke actually say:
Without insurance coverage contraception can cost a woman over $3000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown law report struggling financially as a result of this policy.


Different. You try water statement down to mean something it not mean. You not "fucking prove" squat. Ergo you loose, me tight. Pogo punch holes in you post like loose leaf paper. It fun.

:Boom2:

Are you trying to tell me that struggling financially actually means they can afford it? Because, if that is what you are saying, then you just called Fluke a liar.

Are you actually going to dip into the dumpster of denialism to defy the meaning of words in the English language to the point where "report struggling financially" (verb: report) and "cannot afford" (verb: can) are the same thing?

That very loose indeed. Why you play loose with facts?
Because you loose, dat why.

What do you think the difference between struggle financially and cannot afford is? $5?
 
Last edited:
Was he wrong on his facts? No, he wasn't. She was there to testify that contraception should be paid for. So he made a joke about it, whoopty shit. Anyone that's going to Congress to testify isn't just some innocent private citizen, she was a political hack putting on a show for her Democrat masters.

He said she wanted the government to pay for her contraception.

She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.
That was and is a complete lie. She wanted the health care, which she paid for in her $30,000 per year tuition, and which she had no choice but to accept, to pay for her contraception. I don't think that's being unreasonable.

And no she is not a slut, but you're definitely an asshole.

It was hyperbole, learn the difference.
 
I repeat again, Fluke was asking that the medical insurance which students at Georgetown pay for as part of their tuition, include contraception, no questions asked. The Catholic Church wanted to exclude contraception from the insurance, which would give the Church an exception under the ACA, and Fluke argued against it on behalf of Georgetown's female students. That to ask female students to pay for contraception, over and above tuition which is double the cost of state universities, was a hardship for many students, especially those women who needed the BCP's to treat painful cysts, and other conditions which have nothing to do with contraception.

But that's not what Rush said happened at all. He said that this woman wanted the government to pay her to have sex. It was Rush who went off on this middle-aged man/schoolgirl fantasy trip. Sandra Fluke went to the Senate and talked about women's health issues, and Rush Limbaugh lied about what she said and turned the whole thing into a monologue about slutty co-eds.

Those of you here who claim he was right have no idea what Fluke said, nor do you care. You just wanna have a go at one them femi-nazis.

No she was not.

She was asking that the government force Georgetown to cover it. There is a difference that is important here, if you believe in freedom.
 
Was he wrong on his facts? No, he wasn't. She was there to testify that contraception should be paid for. So he made a joke about it, whoopty shit. Anyone that's going to Congress to testify isn't just some innocent private citizen, she was a political hack putting on a show for her Democrat masters.

He said she wanted the government to pay for her contraception.

She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.

That was and is a complete lie. She wanted the health care, which she paid for in her $30,000 per year tuition, and which she had no choice but to accept, to pay for her contraception. I don't think that's being unreasonable.

And no she is not a slut, but you're definitely an asshole.

Oh really? You ask Georgetown University's insurance company to pay for contraception by going to CAPITAL HILL?

Holy fuck you liberals are dumb. The AGENDA was to have government force insurance companies to pay for college co-ed's sluts, and the end game for the liberal agenda is to have taxpayer funded government health care.

You're not fooling anyone.
 
I repeat again, Fluke was asking that the medical insurance which students at Georgetown pay for as part of their tuition, include contraception, no questions asked. The Catholic Church wanted to exclude contraception from the insurance, which would give the Church an exception under the ACA, and Fluke argued against it on behalf of Georgetown's female students. That to ask female students to pay for contraception, over and above tuition which is double the cost of state universities, was a hardship for many students, especially those women who needed the BCP's to treat painful cysts, and other conditions which have nothing to do with contraception.

But that's not what Rush said happened at all. He said that this woman wanted the government to pay her to have sex. It was Rush who went off on this middle-aged man/schoolgirl fantasy trip. Sandra Fluke went to the Senate and talked about women's health issues, and Rush Limbaugh lied about what she said and turned the whole thing into a monologue about slutty co-eds.

Those of you here who claim he was right have no idea what Fluke said, nor do you care. You just wanna have a go at one them femi-nazis.

Ever wonder why anyone would go to a Catholic University and expect them to pay for something that is totally against their religion? Well that's the sort of thing Rush brought up when talking about Fluke and the Democrat agenda with this whole farce. If you actually had listened to Rush instead of cherry picking sound bites you might have a clue. Instead, you're a political hack that has to display phoney outrage over Rush joking about the Slutter, Sandra Fluke.
 

Forum List

Back
Top