Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To distance yourself from the Republican party because of what Rush said is silly to me.
Just like the Libs blaming all the problems of the world on president Bush is just as silly.
On this issue, it's not just because of what Rush said, it's that no one in the Republican Party stood up on behalf of Sandra Fluke or defended her right to speak to the Committee. In fact, is they said anything at all, they defended Rush and his comments.
When you also consider that the only states putting impediments in the way of women obtaining abortions in the form of transvaginal ultrasounds, are all Republican states, and that all of the legitimate rape guys are Republicans. The same people who don't want to have businesses regulated, sure do want to have women regulated.
As long as Republicans talk about women's reproductive issues as something they have a right to control, women will not vote Republican. Not the smart ones anyway.
Didn't Sara Fluke testify that she wanted government mandated insurance to pay for her birth control? I'd call her a slut.
Every time a Republican supporter calls Fluke a slut, a bell rings, and anotherfeminist is bornangel gets his wings.
I don't remember anyone saying she didn't have a right to speak. I do remember calling her out for lying. I also recall the knee jerk reaction from people like you defending her, and her lies, despite the proof that birth control is not a major expense for the average college student.
To distance yourself from the Republican party because of what Rush said is silly to me.
Just like the Libs blaming all the problems of the world on president Bush is just as silly.
On this issue, it's not just because of what Rush said, it's that no one in the Republican Party stood up on behalf of Sandra Fluke or defended her right to speak to the Committee. In fact, is they said anything at all, they defended Rush and his comments.
When you also consider that the only states putting impediments in the way of women obtaining abortions in the form of transvaginal ultrasounds, are all Republican states, and that all of the legitimate rape guys are Republicans. The same people who don't want to have businesses regulated, sure do want to have women regulated.
As long as Republicans talk about women's reproductive issues as something they have a right to control, women will not vote Republican. Not the smart ones anyway.
I don't remember anyone saying she didn't have a right to speak. I do remember calling her out for lying. I also recall the knee jerk reaction from people like you defending her, and her lies, despite the proof that birth control is not a major expense for the average college student.
??
I don't remember anyone saying she didn't have a right to speak. I do remember calling her out for lying. I also recall the knee jerk reaction from people like you defending her, and her lies, despite the proof that birth control is not a major expense for the average college student.
What lies did she tell? She was talking about the difficulty for women to get their birth control paid for when they have medical conditions, like endometriosis, for which BCP's are a primary form of treatment.
The bald fact is that birth control pills should be covered by health insurance. Period. End of story. Not covering birth control should not be any option for any employer. Let the patient decide what is morally right for her, not her employer.
On this issue, it's not just because of what Rush said, it's that no one in the Republican Party stood up on behalf of Sandra Fluke or defended her right to speak to the Committee. In fact, is they said anything at all, they defended Rush and his comments.
When you also consider that the only states putting impediments in the way of women obtaining abortions in the form of transvaginal ultrasounds, are all Republican states, and that all of the legitimate rape guys are Republicans. The same people who don't want to have businesses regulated, sure do want to have women regulated.
As long as Republicans talk about women's reproductive issues as something they have a right to control, women will not vote Republican. Not the smart ones anyway.
I don't remember anyone saying she didn't have a right to speak. I do remember calling her out for lying. I also recall the knee jerk reaction from people like you defending her, and her lies, despite the proof that birth control is not a major expense for the average college student.
What lying??
The only lying has been from Rash Limpjaw and his sycophants in threads like this. If that's not the case, then why did Lush issue a walletfelt apology on March 3rd?
Unless you can document this, your assertion of "lying" is itself a lie. Like that guy back in post 95 four days ago. I'm still waiting for documentation on that one, but once I called him on it, he ran away because he's a liar and a coward.
Your move...
I don't remember anyone saying she didn't have a right to speak. I do remember calling her out for lying. I also recall the knee jerk reaction from people like you defending her, and her lies, despite the proof that birth control is not a major expense for the average college student.
What lying??
The only lying has been from Rash Limpjaw and his sycophants in threads like this. If that's not the case, then why did Lush issue a walletfelt apology on March 3rd?
Unless you can document this, your assertion of "lying" is itself a lie. Like that guy back in post 95 four days ago. I'm still waiting for documentation on that one, but once I called him on it, he ran away because he's a liar and a coward.
Your move...
Go back and read the threads form the time, there are plenty of them.
She said no such thing, which is why you will never link to a quote from her. You can only find such a claim from your MessiahRushie and the GOP hate media echo chamber.I don't remember anyone saying she didn't have a right to speak. I do remember calling her out for lying. I also recall the knee jerk reaction from people like you defending her, and her lies, despite the proof that birth control is not a major expense for the average college student.
What lies did she tell? She was talking about the difficulty for women to get their birth control paid for when they have medical conditions, like endometriosis, for which BCP's are a primary form of treatment.
The bald fact is that birth control pills should be covered by health insurance. Period. End of story. Not covering birth control should not be any option for any employer. Let the patient decide what is morally right for her, not her employer.
No she wasn't, she said that the average co ed couldn't afford any form of contraception, even free condoms from Planned Parenthood or the $10 bucks a month at the local WalMart to get the pill, and admitted she deliberately went to a Catholic University to force them to provide birth control to everyone free of charge.
x 2
No she wasn't, she said that the average co ed couldn't afford any form of contraception, even free condoms from Planned Parenthood or the $10 bucks a month at the local WalMart to get the pill, and admitted she deliberately went to a Catholic University to force them to provide birth control to everyone free of charge.
So true.To distance yourself from the Republican party because of what Rush said is silly to me.
Just like the Libs blaming all the problems of the world on president Bush is just as silly.
On this issue, it's not just because of what Rush said, it's that no one in the Republican Party stood up on behalf of Sandra Fluke or defended her right to speak to the Committee. In fact, is they said anything at all, they defended Rush and his comments.
When you also consider that the only states putting impediments in the way of women obtaining abortions in the form of transvaginal ultrasounds, are all Republican states, and that all of the legitimate rape guys are Republicans. The same people who don't want to have businesses regulated, sure do want to have women regulated.
As long as Republicans talk about women's reproductive issues as something they have a right to control, women will not vote Republican. Not the smart ones anyway.
I second that motion.Pogo and Ed.....you guys are GOOD. Refuting with actual facts can be tiresome, but you both are doing a fantastic job. Kudos to you both, hat's off, three cheers and
Regards from Rosie
You know, if Far RW radical Republicans didn't lie....they'd have nothing to say.No she wasn't, she said that the average co ed couldn't afford any form of contraception, even free condoms from Planned Parenthood or the $10 bucks a month at the local WalMart to get the pill, and admitted she deliberately went to a Catholic University to force them to provide birth control to everyone free of charge.
That is not what she said at all. This is the text of Ms. Fluke's testimony:
Full Transcript of Sandra Fluke's Testimony - LGF Pages
This woman is a law student, giving serious testimony about violations of women's rights, not some air-head wanting to have her good time funded, as you and others here are painting her to be.
You're no better than those who told the lies in the first place.
The thing is, there actually was a valid policy argument here.
Should organizations be forced to pay for insurance when it covers things that violate their beliefs. Personally, I don't think there should be an exemption. If you are going to make health care a form of compensation instead of a public service like every other civilized country has done, then that compensation should not be limited to the beliefs of the provider.
And it was completely overshadowed by Limbaugh's vile comments.
The thing is, there actually was a valid policy argument here.
Should organizations be forced to pay for insurance when it covers things that violate their beliefs. Personally, I don't think there should be an exemption. If you are going to make health care a form of compensation instead of a public service like every other civilized country has done, then that compensation should not be limited to the beliefs of the provider.
And it was completely overshadowed by Limbaugh's vile comments.
oh brother, Limbaugh's vile comments..the only reason people heard what he said is because of you on the left having a cow over it...blame yourselves
The thing is, there actually was a valid policy argument here.
Should organizations be forced to pay for insurance when it covers things that violate their beliefs. Personally, I don't think there should be an exemption. If you are going to make health care a form of compensation instead of a public service like every other civilized country has done, then that compensation should not be limited to the beliefs of the provider.
And it was completely overshadowed by Limbaugh's vile comments.
oh brother, Limbaugh's vile comments..the only reason people heard what he said is because of you on the left having a cow over it...blame yourselves
Funny, I thought the reason we heard about it was because 500 radio stations across the country carry his show.
Although it was afew less after that.
The thing is, there actually was a valid policy argument here.
Should organizations be forced to pay for insurance when it covers things that violate their beliefs. Personally, I don't think there should be an exemption. If you are going to make health care a form of compensation instead of a public service like every other civilized country has done, then that compensation should not be limited to the beliefs of the provider.
And it was completely overshadowed by Limbaugh's vile comments.
oh brother, Limbaugh's vile comments..the only reason people heard what he said is because of you on the left having a cow over it...blame yourselves
Funny, I thought the reason we heard about it was because 500 radio stations across the country carry his show.
Although it was afew less after that.
oh brother, Limbaugh's vile comments..the only reason people heard what he said is because of you on the left having a cow over it...blame yourselves
Funny, I thought the reason we heard about it was because 500 radio stations across the country carry his show.
Although it was afew less after that.
you people didn't get that upset when Maher called Palin a cxxt..or Letterman said she looked like a slutty flight attendant..you people are such phonies
oh brother, Limbaugh's vile comments..the only reason people heard what he said is because of you on the left having a cow over it...blame yourselves
Funny, I thought the reason we heard about it was because 500 radio stations across the country carry his show.
Although it was afew less after that.
you people didn't get that upset when Maher called Palin a cxxt..or Letterman said she looked like a slutty flight attendant..you people are such phonies
Funny, I thought the reason we heard about it was because 500 radio stations across the country carry his show.
Although it was afew less after that.
you people didn't get that upset when Maher called Palin a cxxt..or Letterman said she looked like a slutty flight attendant..you people are such phonies
Palin is a politician and a public figure.
My problem with Palin is how someone that stupid could be a public figure in this country, or rise to national prominance before everyone got the joke.
oh brother, Limbaugh's vile comments..the only reason people heard what he said is because of you on the left having a cow over it...blame yourselves
Funny, I thought the reason we heard about it was because 500 radio stations across the country carry his show.
Although it was afew less after that.
And also he is desperately attempting to hold on to his wingnut rockstar status by finding more and more extreme things to say for 3 hours a day.
He's having trouble justifying his existence these days.
