Why Did Strzok Refuse to Answer Questions?

[playtime]

dating is allowed as long as it is not a superior/subordinate situation. & if both parties have the same level of security clearance--- it ain't a problem.

It wasn't "dating" moron. Strozk is married. He was committing adultery.

& he was demoted. now- why does the prez--- a proven adulterer, get the highest security clearance there is?

don't start preaching now, little freak.

He's the President, you fucking bonehead. He's not an employee of the FBI.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he's an employee of the american people that has the highest security level there is... & a prime target of blackmail.... should there be any thing incriminating like......say............................a pee pee tape.

There is no pee pee tape, shit-for-brains. There are no rules for what is required to be president other than the ones specified in the Constitution. It's pathetic that this has to be explained to you.

whether there is a tape or not is besides the point... the POINT is- a president is open to all kinds of blackmail, if there is anything that can be dredged up; however a security clearance is not a pre-req for a candidate to run & then get 'hired' as leader of the country.. an FBI agent has to go thru an extensive background check & gets re-visited every 3-5 years. strzok has been in the FBI for 22 years & has passed his clearances several times.

 

[westwall]

True. Carrying on an affair, on the other hand, is a violation of a whole pisspot full of regs.

& when it was found out--- he was demoted.

If he had been working in the private sector he would have been fired immediately.

maybe, maybe not. it would be up to the boss.

Absolutely not. That sort of crap is a landmine of lawsuits. Any adulterous couple (unless it's the owner of the company, of course) are out on their ass.

never say never.

Clearly you're a government worker. Or on welfare.

 

[playtime]

& when it was found out--- he was demoted.

If he had been working in the private sector he would have been fired immediately.

maybe, maybe not. it would be up to the boss.

Absolutely not. That sort of crap is a landmine of lawsuits. Any adulterous couple (unless it's the owner of the company, of course) are out on their ass.

never say never.

Clearly you're a government worker. Or on welfare.

lol... why is that?

 

[bripat9643]

It wasn't "dating" moron. Strozk is married. He was committing adultery.

& he was demoted. now- why does the prez--- a proven adulterer, get the highest security clearance there is?

don't start preaching now, little freak.

He's the President, you fucking bonehead. He's not an employee of the FBI.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he's an employee of the american people that has the highest security level there is... & a prime target of blackmail.... should there be any thing incriminating like......say............................a pee pee tape.

There is no pee pee tape, shit-for-brains. There are no rules for what is required to be president other than the ones specified in the Constitution. It's pathetic that this has to be explained to you.

whether there is a tape or not is besides the point...

Hardly, douchebag. You've been implying that Trump should be impeached over it.

the POINT is- a president is open to all kinds of blackmail, if there is anything that can be dredged up; however a security clearance is not a pre-req for a candidate to run & then get 'hired' as leader of the country.. an FBI agent has to go thru an extensive background check & gets re-visited every 3-5 years. strzok has been in the FBI for 22 years & has passed his clearances several times.

ROFL! So the fact that Strozk broke the rules and should have lost his security clearance and his job according to those rules doesn't matter, but the fact that those rules don't apply to Trump does matter? Strozk would does not now qualify for a securit clearance. End of story.

You're a major fucking imbecile. Why do you even bother to post? You embarass yourself amost every time you do.

I'll repeat it several times so perhaps it will penetrate:

Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.
Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.
Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.
Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.

 

[playtime]

& he was demoted. now- why does the prez--- a proven adulterer, get the highest security clearance there is?

don't start preaching now, little freak.

He's the President, you fucking bonehead. He's not an employee of the FBI.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he's an employee of the american people that has the highest security level there is... & a prime target of blackmail.... should there be any thing incriminating like......say............................a pee pee tape.

There is no pee pee tape, shit-for-brains. There are no rules for what is required to be president other than the ones specified in the Constitution. It's pathetic that this has to be explained to you.

whether there is a tape or not is besides the point...

Hardly, douchebag. You've been implying that Trump should be impeached over it.

the POINT is- a president is open to all kinds of blackmail, if there is anything that can be dredged up; however a security clearance is not a pre-req for a candidate to run & then get 'hired' as leader of the country.. an FBI agent has to go thru an extensive background check & gets re-visited every 3-5 years. strzok has been in the FBI for 22 years & has passed his clearances several times.

ROFL! So the fact that Strozk broke the rules and should have lost his security clearance and his job according to those rules doesn't matter, but the fact that those rules don't apply to Trump does matter? Strozk would does not now qualify for a securit clearance. End of story.

You're a major fucking imbecile. Why do you even bother to post? You embarass yourself amost every time you do.

I'll repeat it several times so perhaps it will penetrate:

Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.
Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.
Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.
Strozk is subject to the regulations on security clearances. Trump isn't.

ho-hum. got that out of your system?


good.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There are no freaking secrets that haven't been leaked to the MSM. The excuse that the information is "classified" doesn't fly and the redacted stuff is just an exercise in CYA. The sad thing is that a lot of this stuff comes down to Sessions inability or unwillingness to deal with a freaking attempted coup on the President of the United States.

One has to wonder what the FBI is using to blackmail him with.

That question applies to Putin, and what he must have on Trump which is likely more than a pissing contest.

 

[BS Filter]

I agree, it would be destructive. It would mean the leftist-socialist-communist corruption in our government would be taken down.

you think you can be taken seriously with that avatar? haaaaaaaa............

Sure, it's a great avatar. It accurately describes obamacare.

uh-sure. why not just have one of 'obamacare' with a red slash thru it?

yaaaaaa.................. we both know why ......

No, I don't know. Why don't you tell us. Go ahead. Are you upset that I'm mocking your lying hero?

really? you got ^^^ that ^^^ out of what i wrote? oh, silly you...you don't upset me. i am simply putting a fine point of what you is.

You're obviously upset.

 

[bripat9643]

There are no freaking secrets that haven't been leaked to the MSM. The excuse that the information is "classified" doesn't fly and the redacted stuff is just an exercise in CYA. The sad thing is that a lot of this stuff comes down to Sessions inability or unwillingness to deal with a freaking attempted coup on the President of the United States.

One has to wonder what the FBI is using to blackmail him with.

That question applies to Putin, and what he must have on Trump which is likely more than a pissing contest.

There isn't anything likely about it at all.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There are no freaking secrets that haven't been leaked to the MSM. The excuse that the information is "classified" doesn't fly and the redacted stuff is just an exercise in CYA. The sad thing is that a lot of this stuff comes down to Sessions inability or unwillingness to deal with a freaking attempted coup on the President of the United States.

One has to wonder what the FBI is using to blackmail him with.

That question applies to Putin, and what he must have on Trump which is likely more than a pissing contest.

There isn't anything likely about it at all.

Yeah, then why is Trump kissing Putin's ass and insulting our allies?

Or are you in total denial?

Or II, are you an agent provocateur for Russia?

Or III, are you insane?

 

[Thinker101]

Q. What was their not so well hidden agenda

A. To discredit the Mueller Investigation.

Being discredited is nothing new for Mueller, he has a long record of being a blundering Doofus.

If you'll remember Mueller's screwup of the Anthrax investigation of 2001 and how it cost we the taxpayers $5 Million for ruining one Mr. Hatfill's life.

No, I don't recall such a "screwup". Post a credible link for review.

Not to worry, I'm sure your dementia will kick in again after you read it.
Comey, Mueller bungled big anthrax case together – Orange County Register

Well, as Reagan once said, trust but verify. So, I will need another couple of credible links to verify this "screwup" comment.

The Orange County Register is somewhat suspect as credible since it is owned by a private equity firm, 2100 Trust, established in 2010 by investor - Drum roll please:

Aaron Kushner

I haven't been able to connect Aaron Kushner to Jerod Kushner or his father, Charles Kushner, but as I am someone who completed felony investigations during a 32 year career in LE, I don't believe in coincidences.

In any event, even if their is no connection to the Kushner crime family, I will look into the "screwup", which, BTW, is no proof of anything if true, other than an effort to obfuscate and obstruct justice.

Have at it.

 

[depotoo]

No, Robert Mueller And James Comey Aren't Heroes | HuffPost

Q. What was their not so well hidden agenda

A. To discredit the Mueller Investigation.

Being discredited is nothing new for Mueller, he has a long record of being a blundering Doofus.

If you'll remember Mueller's screwup of the Anthrax investigation of 2001 and how it cost we the taxpayers $5 Million for ruining one Mr. Hatfill's life.

No, I don't recall such a "screwup". Post a credible link for review.

Not to worry, I'm sure your dementia will kick in again after you read it.
Comey, Mueller bungled big anthrax case together – Orange County Register

Well, as Reagan once said, trust but verify. So, I will need another couple of credible links to verify this "screwup" comment.

The Orange County Register is somewhat suspect as credible since it is owned by a private equity firm, 2100 Trust, established in 2010 by investor - Drum roll please:

Aaron Kushner

I haven't been able to connect Aaron Kushner to Jerod Kushner or his father, Charles Kushner, but as I am someone who completed felony investigations during a 32 year career in LE, I don't believe in coincidences.

In any event, even if their is no connection to the Kushner crime family, I will look into the "screwup", which, BTW, is no proof of anything if true, other than an effort to obfuscate and obstruct justice.

 

[Markle]

Yet you cannot point to even one official act of bias. So retarded.

Having seen the vile nature of his texts to and from his lover. If you or a loved one was being investigated by Strozk and he had said these things about you or your loved one, how confident would you be that his judgment would be totally unbiased?

 

[Markle]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he's an employee of the american people that has the highest security level there is... & a prime target of blackmail.... should there be any thing incriminating like......say............................a pee pee tape.

Where is that tape posted?

 

[playtime]

you think you can be taken seriously with that avatar? haaaaaaaa............

Sure, it's a great avatar. It accurately describes obamacare.

uh-sure. why not just have one of 'obamacare' with a red slash thru it?

yaaaaaa.................. we both know why ......

No, I don't know. Why don't you tell us. Go ahead. Are you upset that I'm mocking your lying hero?

really? you got ^^^ that ^^^ out of what i wrote? oh, silly you...you don't upset me. i am simply putting a fine point of what you is.

You're obviously upset.

you obviously need to believe that to justify your own shortcomings.

it's ok, i understand.

 

[playtime]

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he's an employee of the american people that has the highest security level there is... & a prime target of blackmail.... should there be any thing incriminating like......say............................a pee pee tape.

Where is that tape posted?

it hasn't been posted.

but you knew that. i don't know whether it exists ---- don't even care if it exists ----- besides, there could be much more damaging little secrets that trump is hiding, & a pee pee tape would probably be the least of them.

after all, donny from queens has a long history of bad behavior that the public has seen & hear over the decades.

imagine what hasn't been reported?

 

[BS Filter]

Sure, it's a great avatar. It accurately describes obamacare.

uh-sure. why not just have one of 'obamacare' with a red slash thru it?

yaaaaaa.................. we both know why ......

No, I don't know. Why don't you tell us. Go ahead. Are you upset that I'm mocking your lying hero?

really? you got ^^^ that ^^^ out of what i wrote? oh, silly you...you don't upset me. i am simply putting a fine point of what you is.

You're obviously upset.

you obviously need to believe that to justify your own shortcomings.

it's ok, i understand.

Good, that's the first step to being an adult.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yet you cannot point to even one official act of bias. So retarded.

Having seen the vile nature of his texts to and from his lover. If you or a loved one was being investigated by Strozk and he had said these things about you or your loved one, how confident would you be that his judgment would be totally unbiased?

Completely. Especially given the conclusions of the IG and his own testimony under oath.

The better question is still, what evidence do you have that he acted in an official capacity with bias?

The answer, none of course.

Your bias is showing.

 

[BS Filter]

Yet you cannot point to even one official act of bias. So retarded.

Having seen the vile nature of his texts to and from his lover. If you or a loved one was being investigated by Strozk and he had said these things about you or your loved one, how confident would you be that his judgment would be totally unbiased?

Completely. Especially given the conclusions of the IG and his own testimony under oath.

The better question is still, what evidence do you have that he acted in an official capacity with bias?

The answer, none of course.

Your bias is showing.

He was fired by Mueller from the investigation.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yet you cannot point to even one official act of bias. So retarded.

Having seen the vile nature of his texts to and from his lover. If you or a loved one was being investigated by Strozk and he had said these things about you or your loved one, how confident would you be that his judgment would be totally unbiased?

Completely. Especially given the conclusions of the IG and his own testimony under oath.

The better question is still, what evidence do you have that he acted in an official capacity with bias?

The answer, none of course.

Your bias is showing.

He was fired by Mueller from the investigation.

He was reassigned. Mueller knew the perception of these texts would cause a shitstorm. They have indeed and Mueller was smart to remove him immediately in order to protect the investigation. There is no official finding of bias in his professional conduct.

Stop lying.

 

[buckeye45_73]

ah I hate to interrupt the circle jerk of pseudo intellecuals, but what evidence is he talking about? Or is this one of those we'll see in the report kinda deals?

Trumpanzees have issues with intellecTuals.

pseudo intellectuals, see you guys take everything out of context.....thanks for proving my point.

Your point that you are just another gullible Trumpkin defending Don the Con?

Yep- we keep proving that.

Again my candidate won, I'm getting judges on the SC that I like, I got my tax cut, I got regulations reduced. I'll get a republican majority this fall and then a border wall. I really don't give a fuck what you think.

Of course you don't.

Don the Con suckered you right in.

Imagine- finally getting a Republican majority in Congress this fall.....

LOL

I didn't say finally....we'll get another one and you'll scream at the sky.
and I don't give a fuck what you think, Donny is doing what I voted for him to do.