Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said he had low voter turnout among young people. And that's a fact.See post 58.California has the most delegates. It would have put him over the hump.
That's in California... not the entire cycle.
And low young voter turnout was true across all the primaries.
18 to 25 year olds are always the lowest turnout demographic.
Again...that's ONE state. You really didn't pay that much attention to the Democratic primaries if you think Sanders didn't do well with young voters.
You can go on and on about how many young people showed up to vote, but your statement that he didn't do well with young voters is false. He more than doubled Clinton in the young voters. You're wrong, just admit it and move on.
I said he had low voter turnout among young people. And that's a fact.See post 58.California has the most delegates. It would have put him over the hump.That's in California... not the entire cycle.
And low young voter turnout was true across all the primaries.
18 to 25 year olds are always the lowest turnout demographic.
Again...that's ONE state. You really didn't pay that much attention to the Democratic primaries if you think Sanders didn't do well with young voters.
You can go on and on about how many young people showed up to vote, but your statement that he didn't do well with young voters is false. He more than doubled Clinton in the young voters. You're wrong, just admit it and move on.
Sorry.
It doesn't matter how much the kids scream and faint at the sight of Sanders. They don't show up to vote in great numbers. Older people do, and they voted for Trump and Clinton.
That's why Sanders lost.
They gave all the same excuses for why Trump couldn't win.I said he had low voter turnout among young people. And that's a fact.See post 58.California has the most delegates. It would have put him over the hump.
And low young voter turnout was true across all the primaries.
18 to 25 year olds are always the lowest turnout demographic.
Again...that's ONE state. You really didn't pay that much attention to the Democratic primaries if you think Sanders didn't do well with young voters.
You can go on and on about how many young people showed up to vote, but your statement that he didn't do well with young voters is false. He more than doubled Clinton in the young voters. You're wrong, just admit it and move on.
Sorry.
It doesn't matter how much the kids scream and faint at the sight of Sanders. They don't show up to vote in great numbers. Older people do, and they voted for Trump and Clinton.
That's why Sanders lost.
Again, you're wrong. Sanders lost because the older White establishment thought Clinton was the "safe" candidate. He also lost because in many primaries Independent voters weren't allowed to participate. He lost because Clinton was getting the favorable press... and it was because it was constantly broadcast that the primaries didn't really matter because less than half way through the election cycle, with the number of Superdelegates pledged to Clinton, Sanders couldn't win.
They gave all the same excuses for why Trump couldn't win.I said he had low voter turnout among young people. And that's a fact.See post 58.Again...that's ONE state. You really didn't pay that much attention to the Democratic primaries if you think Sanders didn't do well with young voters.
You can go on and on about how many young people showed up to vote, but your statement that he didn't do well with young voters is false. He more than doubled Clinton in the young voters. You're wrong, just admit it and move on.
Sorry.
It doesn't matter how much the kids scream and faint at the sight of Sanders. They don't show up to vote in great numbers. Older people do, and they voted for Trump and Clinton.
That's why Sanders lost.
Again, you're wrong. Sanders lost because the older White establishment thought Clinton was the "safe" candidate. He also lost because in many primaries Independent voters weren't allowed to participate. He lost because Clinton was getting the favorable press... and it was because it was constantly broadcast that the primaries didn't really matter because less than half way through the election cycle, with the number of Superdelegates pledged to Clinton, Sanders couldn't win.
Nice try.
The short answer is that the Democratic party isn't democratic. It's an authoritarian political machine with a specific agenda and it dictates that agenda to its members.Again, you're wrong. Sanders lost because the older White establishment thought Clinton was the "safe" candidate. He also lost because in many primaries Independent voters weren't allowed to participate. He lost because Clinton was getting the favorable press... and it was because it was constantly broadcast that the primaries didn't really matter because less than half way through the election cycle, with the number of Superdelegates pledged to Clinton, Sanders couldn't win.
Lol merry Christmas to you too!I voted and enjoyed doing my write in
Who did you write in you precious, petulant sanctimonious turd? Fuck you and your write in, asshole.
Well said and the more solid American, IMHO. It's good to voice one's opinions and it's good to listen to the opinions of others. It's bad to shut down any disagreement with "Fuck you" and "asshole".Lol merry Christmas to you too!I voted and enjoyed doing my write in
Who did you write in you precious, petulant sanctimonious turd? Fuck you and your write in, asshole.
^ thatI provided the facts which prove both of you wrong.California has the most delegates. It would have put him over the hump.That's in California... not the entire cycle.
And low young voter turnout was true across all the primaries.
18 to 25 year olds are always the lowest turnout demographic.
Again...that's ONE state. You really didn't pay that much attention to the Democratic primaries if you think Sanders didn't do well with young voters.
EXACTLY!
G5000's prob is that he's biased but doesn't think anyone notices Lewdog
No you didn't... but you keep telling yourself that. Eventually people like you that keep repeating things to yourself that are false narratives will shrivel up and disappear.
Thats the way the crony Establ likes it.I said he had low voter turnout among young people. And that's a fact.See post 58.California has the most delegates. It would have put him over the hump.
And low young voter turnout was true across all the primaries.
18 to 25 year olds are always the lowest turnout demographic.
Again...that's ONE state. You really didn't pay that much attention to the Democratic primaries if you think Sanders didn't do well with young voters.
You can go on and on about how many young people showed up to vote, but your statement that he didn't do well with young voters is false. He more than doubled Clinton in the young voters. You're wrong, just admit it and move on.
Sorry.
It doesn't matter how much the kids scream and faint at the sight of Sanders. They don't show up to vote in great numbers. Older people do, and they voted for Trump and Clinton.
That's why Sanders lost.
Again, you're wrong. Sanders lost because the older White establishment thought Clinton was the "safe" candidate. He also lost because in many primaries Independent voters weren't allowed to participate. He lost because Clinton was getting the favorable press... and it was because it was constantly broadcast that the primaries didn't really matter because less than half way through the election cycle, with the number of Superdelegates pledged to Clinton, Sanders couldn't win.
yeah G5000. We'll waitThey gave all the same excuses for why Trump couldn't win.I said he had low voter turnout among young people. And that's a fact.See post 58.
You can go on and on about how many young people showed up to vote, but your statement that he didn't do well with young voters is false. He more than doubled Clinton in the young voters. You're wrong, just admit it and move on.
Sorry.
It doesn't matter how much the kids scream and faint at the sight of Sanders. They don't show up to vote in great numbers. Older people do, and they voted for Trump and Clinton.
That's why Sanders lost.
Again, you're wrong. Sanders lost because the older White establishment thought Clinton was the "safe" candidate. He also lost because in many primaries Independent voters weren't allowed to participate. He lost because Clinton was getting the favorable press... and it was because it was constantly broadcast that the primaries didn't really matter because less than half way through the election cycle, with the number of Superdelegates pledged to Clinton, Sanders couldn't win.
Nice try.
Please provide a link to the Superdelegate system for the general election.
The Constitution is impotent and a dead letter. No government at all would be as good a deal as the glorified protection racket we're forced to put up with right now.You're obviously not a supporter of the 'Murican Constitution. What form of government do you prefer? Something from the "old country"? Anarchy?
Translation: You are correct, DW. I spit on the American Constitution and believe you 'Murican's are assholes. FUCK YOU!The Constitution is impotent and a dead letter. No government at all would be as good a deal as the glorified protection racket we're forced to put up with right now.
Just found out Skull Pilot didn't vote. LoserAlmost half of all eligible voters didn't vote in the recent election.
What's your excuse?
I wish Republicans would have taken away their free/affordable healthcare.considering that the poorest voters would have voted for hillary, its odd that you would say that.Exactly! And you know most of them were poor. So fuck them.Almost half of all eligible voters didn't vote in the recent election.
What's your excuse?
On Election Day, not voting is also a legitimate choice - The Boston GlobeJust found out Skull Pilot didn't vote. LoserAlmost half of all eligible voters didn't vote in the recent election.
What's your excuse?
