Why do Christians Strongly Disagree with Science and Distrust Scientists

[homo#1]

"Science cannot disprove the existence of the jewish/christian/islmaic deity"

Science isn't about disproving, they look and until they find something, it's just a theory.

 

[AllieBaba]

Because scientists can disprove pretty much everything in the bible.

Not everything, just the claims related to the physical universe- like sun being made after the earth. The existence of the biblical gos is not proven through science, but it the logical implication of the bible's failure

I'd love to have one example of something in the bible that has been definitively disproved by science.

 

[JBeukema]

I'd love to have one example of something in the bible that has been definitively disproved by science.

I'll give you four:
The earth being created before the sun and moon- 'lights in the sky'
The moon being a light
the firmament
waters below and above the earth...

 

[homo#1]

How about the earth wasn't created in 6 days or that the earth is older than 6000 years. There's also no scientific proof of the flood, the parting of the sea...

 

[AllieBaba]

I'd love to have one example of something in the bible that has been definitively disproved by science.

I'll give you four:
The earth being created before the sun and moon- 'lights in the sky'
The moon being a light
the firmament
waters below and above the earth...

You saying it isn't definitive proof, genius.

Provide some proof. Or I'll just say "The bible says not" and we'll leave it at that. Stalemate.

 

[Avatar4321]

I dont disagree with science or scientists as a general practice. I will disagree with those who use faulty science.

 

[AllieBaba]

Exactly.

I see there's no definitive proof posted yet. And this is page 14.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Beuk, you'll have to translate that into english for me

Claims such as the earth was created before the sun, as recorded in genesis, can be shown false by science.

Claims regarding when Jesus was born cannot be addressed by science- the scientific method can't repeat history to see it someone is born again and again and did exist. Science can provide evidence to support the existence of a person, but cannot prove scientifically that Jesus, Abraham Lincoln, or you great-grandpop existed.

Claims that a deity loves you cannot be refuted by science.

Jesus' birthdate can be defeated with reason- history records the dates of the census in Judah and the time when Herod reigned and ordered the massacre of Jewish children. Once cannot have escaped herod then gone back in time for the census, so we know someone is lying.

Science cannot disprove the existence of the jewish/christian/islmaic deity, but can establish facts that refute the biblical claims, proving the text fallible and, in turn, logic dictates that the claims made on the grounds of that infallibility no longer have any authority

The biblical traditions can easily be dismantled, but not by science alone, for science cannot address the ideological or philosophical directly

Yo, dipshit.........first off, there was LIGHT before there was earth, so read Genesis dipstick.

Next.......you should understand that there is a lot of stuff in the Torah, all the way from DNA strands to astronomy and astrology, as well as quite a bit of science. After all.....Hebrew is a math based language.

As far as the rest of your bullshit? Pure bullshit.

Try again ya fucking moron.

Oh yeah.......for the idea that everything is alive? Might wanna study Tao.

 

[Bullypulpit]

In answer to the question which opened the thread...they disagree with and distrust science for the same reason the pre-Reformation Catholic Church did. It undermines their dogma which, in turn, undermines their grasp in political power.

 

[JBeukema]

You saying it isn't definitive proof, genius.

Not what I said, You fail, try again

Provide some proof. Or I'll just say "The bible says not" and we'll leave it at that. Stalemate.

Scream louder, people can still hear the voice of reason destroying your pathetic myths

Yo, dipshit.........first off, there was LIGHT before there was earth, so read Genesis dipstick.

And then the earth and then the lights in the sky- earth and moon.

Was man created before or after the animals? Careful, there's no right answer...

As far as the rest of your bullshit? Pure bullshit.

Try again ya fucking moron.

Now there's about the extent to which religion ever challenges science. notice the appeal to ridicule and personal attack when the subject is completely unable to defend doctrine or counter the evidence presented

Oh yeah.......for the idea that everything is alive? Might wanna study Tao.

Can't believe in Tao and the bible- anything not from God is of the Devil. Might wanna read you bible again

In answer to the question which opened the thread...they disagree with and distrust science for the same reason the pre-Reformation Catholic Church did. It undermines their dogma which, in turn, undermines their grasp in political power.

'bout sums it up

 

[ABikerSailor]

First off, Tao is very close philosophically, to Judaism.

Second........it said on the SIXTH DAY God created man, so, man was the last. And......the reason that man was the last creation, that is why we were given dominion over them.

First, God said "let there be Light", and the rest of the creation happens from there.

You aren't even half as smart as you'd like to believe dude.

 

[Avatar4321]

First off, Tao is very close philosophically, to Judaism.

Second........it said on the SIXTH DAY God created man, so, man was the last. And......the reason that man was the last creation, that is why we were given dominion over them.

First, God said "let there be Light", and the rest of the creation happens from there.

You aren't even half as smart as you'd like to believe dude.

Actually, woman was the last creation.

 

[Avatar4321]

In answer to the question which opened the thread...they disagree with and distrust science for the same reason the pre-Reformation Catholic Church did. It undermines their dogma which, in turn, undermines their grasp in political power.

Actually, no it doesnt.

 

[ABikerSailor]

First off, Tao is very close philosophically, to Judaism.

Second........it said on the SIXTH DAY God created man, so, man was the last. And......the reason that man was the last creation, that is why we were given dominion over them.

First, God said "let there be Light", and the rest of the creation happens from there.

You aren't even half as smart as you'd like to believe dude.

Actually, woman was the last creation.

Yep, but Lillith was also the first.

So, you could say women are the first and the last if you wanted.

Yo......JButtSmeller..........you should also look into Judaism, as they state that everything has a spirit, so therefore, everything is alive.

Ever heard of a golem?

 

[ABikerSailor]

In answer to the question which opened the thread...they disagree with and distrust science for the same reason the pre-Reformation Catholic Church did. It undermines their dogma which, in turn, undermines their grasp in political power.

Actually, no it doesnt.

Actually, yes, it does. The Catholic church took a lot of stuff from Jerusalem, and, when they saw there was a religion that a lot of people believed in, they started to use it as a way to expand their power and land.

And.......because most of the people in Europe at the time (including Rome), were pagans, they mixed in a lot of their rituals, combined them with Christianity, and came up with Catholicism.

Easter is a good example of this........and, as further proof? How in the world could Yeshua have celebrated Passover AFTER Easter?

Happened last year.

 

[JBeukema]

First off, Tao is very close philosophically, to Judaism.

Second........it said on the SIXTH DAY God created man, so, man was the last. And......the reason that man was the last creation, that is why we were given dominion over them.

Read genesis two

First, God said "let there be Light", and the rest of the creation happens from there.

light, earth, firmament and waters and shit, stars sun and moon... It mentions light before the sun and moon being made. Read it again

Ever heard of a golem?

and other jewish witchcraft condemned in to torah

Easter is a good example of this........and, as further proof? How in the world could Yeshua have celebrated Passover AFTER Easter?

Happened last year.

Eostre/Astarte/Ashera/etc

Or Saturnalia, All Hollows Eve, and others

 

[ABikerSailor]

JButtSmeller.

......ya ought to lay off your weird beliefs. They're fucking with your perception.

By the way.....lemmie do you a favor......if you've got cable, watch God's Learning Channel today. Avi Ben Mordachi and Uri Harel are two good shows that will explain things to you.

 

[JBeukema]

try opening the bible and reading what it says instead of swallowing dogma wholesale

 

[homo#1]

Mary was a virgin, apparently she only ass fucked. Some cum musta dribbled into her snatch.

 

[Bullypulpit]

In answer to the question which opened the thread...they disagree with and distrust science for the same reason the pre-Reformation Catholic Church did. It undermines their dogma which, in turn, undermines their grasp in political power.

Actually, no it doesnt.

Actually, yes, it does. The Catholic church took a lot of stuff from Jerusalem, and, when they saw there was a religion that a lot of people believed in, they started to use it as a way to expand their power and land.

And.......because most of the people in Europe at the time (including Rome), were pagans, they mixed in a lot of their rituals, combined them with Christianity, and came up with Catholicism.

Easter is a good example of this........and, as further proof? How in the world could Yeshua have celebrated Passover AFTER Easter?

Happened last year.

Christianity is, and always has been, a syncretic religion.