🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Why Do Democrats Continue To Engage In Political Theater / Waste Our Time?

Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

Why should the President agree to testify under oath before Democrats when former FBI agent Page testified the FBI illegally conducted its own investigation of Trump for collusion BEFORE the official investigation began and found ZERO EVIDENCE, ZERO CRIME, AND ZERO COLLUSION...yet the FBI collaborated with Barry's DOJ, NSA, CIA, Trump-hating foreign spies working with the FBI, and Russians - illegally using Hillary's bought and paid for 'unreliable' document to illegally obtain warrants and open an investigation of a crime they already knew never happened?

The ONLY ones who should be testifying under oath before Congress is the exposed conspirators behind the proven coup.
 
No one likes Chris Wallace. Chris Wallace exists to provide opposition opinion. Chris Wallace is more suited to CBS or MSNBC.

He is not bad enough to ever place at CNN. He'd be an outcast there.
Haha, classic response. Don’t address anything of substance, just go for the personal attacks. Can you be any more dimwitted? My guess is yes... carry on please

I did not personally attack Chris Wallace. I criticized his left leaning reporting.

Did I call him The Orange Menace?
What about his reporting on this topic are you criticizing? What do you disagree with? I posted a link to what he said
Clapper says that Obama ordered The Russian Collusion Smear Operation Against Trump. That means we can suspect that certain Media Personalities participated in it, since this was an Obama FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA operation ordered by Obama.

If the shoe fits Wallace's Ass, then boot him with it.
Do I need to repost my last question that you completely ignored or are you savvy enough to scroll up and read it again. How about you try answering it this time. Take 2, go!
No, you should check in with Putin before you do that to make sure you phrase the question correctly.

Then get back to me. Check in with your boss first.
 
Democrats? How about Dems and Reps... or Congress. It’s coming from both sides and has for a while now. If you can’t see that then you have blinders on.

It's easy S cartoon garb, huge blinders and zero education
 
Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

Why should the President agree to testify under oath before Democrats when former FBI agent Page testified the FBI illegally conducted its own investigation of Trump for collusion BEFORE the official investigation began and found ZERO EVIDENCE, ZERO CRIME, AND ZERO COLLUSION...yet the FBI collaborated with Barry's DOJ, NSA, CIA, Trump-hating foreign spies working with the FBI, and Russians - illegally using Hillary's bought and paid for 'unreliable' document to illegally obtain warrants and open an investigation of a crime they already knew never happened?

The ONLY ones who should be testifying under oath before Congress is the exposed conspirators behind the proven coup.
That reminds me, How on Earth was Mills, Rice and Lynch able to avoid appearing before a Hearing when they were requested to appear? Same with Powers and Yates?

Obama officials blocked it while they were still in power. These people need to be looked at again.
 
Congress reviews classified data all the time.

Why does Trumpybear want to deep six the information?


Sad soggy booboo. The DOJ needs to redact the document for the names of innocent people before the report is distributed. That is standard OP when the LAW IS FOLLOWED. The Dems want the report now so they can find new targets to harass, which is quite disgusting.

The Oversight Committee is not the public and needs no such redaction's.
I don't think anyone trusts congress after they relased Dr Fords name....they don't have the best track record


The Senate Dems are a Leaky Colostomy Bag.

Just sayin'.
Yeah their leadership is ooooooold....and their new people are retarded.......what a dilemma!!!
 
Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

Why should the President agree to testify under oath before Democrats when former FBI agent Page testified the FBI illegally conducted its own investigation of Trump for collusion BEFORE the official investigation began and found ZERO EVIDENCE, ZERO CRIME, AND ZERO COLLUSION...yet the FBI collaborated with Barry's DOJ, NSA, CIA, Trump-hating foreign spies working with the FBI, and Russians - illegally using Hillary's bought and paid for 'unreliable' document to illegally obtain warrants and open an investigation of a crime they already knew never happened?

The ONLY ones who should be testifying under oath before Congress is the exposed conspirators behind the proven coup.

Barry?
Why don't you have a few balls and call him an uppity nixxer?
How's your zero college white nationalist doing?
 
Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

Why should the President agree to testify under oath before Democrats when former FBI agent Page testified the FBI illegally conducted its own investigation of Trump for collusion BEFORE the official investigation began and found ZERO EVIDENCE, ZERO CRIME, AND ZERO COLLUSION...yet the FBI collaborated with Barry's DOJ, NSA, CIA, Trump-hating foreign spies working with the FBI, and Russians - illegally using Hillary's bought and paid for 'unreliable' document to illegally obtain warrants and open an investigation of a crime they already knew never happened?

The ONLY ones who should be testifying under oath before Congress is the exposed conspirators behind the proven coup.
That reminds me, How on Earth was Mills, Rice and Lynch able to avoid appearing before a Hearing when they were requested to appear? Same with Powers and Yates?

Obama officials blocked it while they were still in power. These people need to be looked at again.
It reminds me how evidence shows Russian interference began in 2014, how Obama knew about it yet allowed it to continue for 2 years, and Mueller and the Democrats - demanding an investigation of Russian interference in 2016 - completely avoided investigating where / when it all began....in 2014 under Obama who, again, knew about it yet allowed it to continue.
 
The coup is overblown rhetoric. If you want to stick to facts and reality then talk about their politicalization of the investigation.
You sound like Adam Schiff, who continues to deny all the existing and overwhelming evidence of crimes committed by the Democrats. YOU can continue to do like 'Schiff' and repeating 'nuh-huh' and claiming definitive evidence of Trump illegal collusion does exist while refusing to provide any such evidence...except for personal belief - like Schiff demonstrated last week.

By doing so, as already pointed out, you will only continue to ensure President Trump is re-elected.
That should be great for you with such an easy re-election coming. I’ll wait to see how many of these traitors Trumps DOJ throws in jail. If none then we know all this crap you are spewing is nothing more than political garbage.
Oh so you say the Russia hoax was a hoax, no one went to jail for it.....thanks!
 
Democrats? How about Dems and Reps... or Congress. It’s coming from both sides and has for a while now. If you can’t see that then you have blinders on.

Both engage in political theater. The Democrats are the only ones doing it right now as part of their on-going exposed criminal / treasonous coup attempt.
The coup is overblown rhetoric. If you want to stick to facts and reality then talk about their politicalization of the investigation. When you take it a step to far like you do then you discredit yourself.
is it?

*if* they lied to get an elected president out of office by means of using the government against them, then a threat like this to me is every bit as bad as if russia were in fact involved.

the president is here to defend the constitution against foreign OR domestic threats. *if* this was all based off revenge politics then the coup is NOT overblown rhetoric and i would want it dug into. this is not revenge on the democrats but rather, if no issue was there we cannot allow some kabuki theater every time someone is elected you don't like. that WILL happen if we don't penalize people for the behavior IF NOT based off actual events, but contrived ones it would seem that it was.
That’s just the thing... people like Rush and Hannity have been pushing false narratives and inaccurate timelines to create this coup conspiracy. Chris Wallace just debunked some
Major talking points of theirs a few days ago.

Fox News' Chris Wallace sets record straight on Russia probe: "This is going to drive some of our viewers nuts"
sorry - but when the left does shit like what they did to kavanaugh, i see this as SOP for them. shout out FOUL and get as much political gain as you can out of something that is "opinionated" and hard to pin down. someone tries to pin you down, get offended and demand even MOAR.

if the left did not go apeshit batty over RUSSIA and see it in everything that happened, then maybe the right wouldn't need to respond as they have.
 
Last edited:
I think it's great! The majority of the public think that the Mueller probe was a political witch hunt (true), and that it's time to move on. The more the Dems engage in Sore Loserman Part III, the more we'll get Trump 2020!
Refused your socialist SS Medicare VA benefits?
 
and it came out last week

No it didn't. What came out last week was a letter from the newly appointed AG. One who showed publicly his bias in this case. He cited a couple of sentences from Mueller's report, which I assume is very similar in form to Comey's statement about the investigation into Hillary's email shit. But since no one has seen Mueller's summation except Barr, we'll just have to wait to see if their are any similarities.
No Mueller turned in the report to his boss last week.....so yeah it's in.....self important and entitled snowflake.....you're gonna have to wait to see it......just like everyone else......#deal with it
 
I’ll wait to see how many of these traitors Trumps DOJ throws in jail. If none then we know all this crap you are spewing is nothing more than political garbage.
How so? You attempt to spread the false narrative that if someone is not convicted they never committed the crime. We know that NOT to be the case. The Obama administration and Democrats protected just about the entire Obama administration Cabinet / Agency Directors from indictment despite being proven to have committed crimes.
- Clapper was caught perjuring himself multiple times but protected.

- Brennan was caught illegally spying on US Senators - his 'punishment' was to admit it before Congress.

- Holder was protected from indictment for Perjury but was the 1st Presidential Administration Cabinet Member in US history to be Censured after being caught committing Felony Perjury while trying to cover up Obama's fast and furious.

- THE FBI publicly announced they had recovered over 15,000 official subpoenaed documents Hillary had attempted to destroy that were each individually 1 count of Obstruction and violations of both the FOIA and Federal records act.
*** Evidence has now exposed the Obama administration's DOJ and FBI agreement to protect Hillary from indictment / prison for her crimes.

Nice fairy tale, snowflake, but Democrats protecting Democrats from being held accountable for their crimes is just another reality on the list of things snowflakes refuse to accept.
If all of that was true then Trump would surly rectify it now that he is in charge, right? I’ll wait and see but forgive me for not holding my breath.
Any
Day
Now.

Give us about 3 years of tormenting you until we put these people behind bars.
I’m still waiting for Trump to lock her up... it’s been what, three years now since he made that promise?
I love this, what promise?
 
I think it's great! The majority of the public think that the Mueller probe was a political witch hunt (true), and that it's time to move on. The more the Dems engage in Sore Loserman Part III, the more we'll get Trump 2020!
Refused your socialist SS Medicare VA benefits?
I love my groper Pres who dragged his wife by the hair before raping her, and wanted to screw his daughter.
I'm very jealous
 
and it came out last week

No it didn't. What came out last week was a letter from the newly appointed AG. One who showed publicly his bias in this case. He cited a couple of sentences from Mueller's report, which I assume is very similar in form to Comey's statement about the investigation into Hillary's email shit. But since no one has seen Mueller's summation except Barr, we'll just have to wait to see if their are any similarities.
No Mueller turned in the report to his boss last week.....so yeah it's in.....self important and entitled snowflake.....you're gonna have to wait to see it......just like everyone else......#deal with it
Snowflake, original pro slavery white boys?
Just trying to help
 
The President called on the US AG to release all the information he legally can,

Trumpybear lies all the time. He also said he "Wanted" to testify under oath to the Mueller team.

If you believed that, I have some nice land in East Texas I'l like to sell you.......
78 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List | Sharyl Attkisson

how about some equal opportunity rage? i hear nothing from you on the >75 lies ABOUT trump. you can't keep lying about someone and it not catch up eventually.
 
I think it's great! The majority of the public think that the Mueller probe was a political witch hunt (true), and that it's time to move on. The more the Dems engage in Sore Loserman Part III, the more we'll get Trump 2020!
Refused your socialist SS Medicare VA benefits?
I love my groper Pres who dragged his wife by the hair before raping her, and wanted to screw his daughter.
I'm very jealous
Damn, when you are getting the Schiff kicked out of you in a debate about a topic you won't hesitate to dive into the gutter and throw shit to distract...pretty pathetic.....but SOP for a Treason-supporting Turmp-hating snowflake....
 
Democrats are saying something if anyone cares to listen and understand.

The law isn't working for them anymore. They don't like it. They will not obey nor abide by those old rules. They do have an excuse. Those laws were white man's laws. Those rules were white man's rules. Biden said it best. White jurisprudence has to go.

All those laws that you cite are meaningless to democrats. All the necessary redactions don't count. That was under the old law.
 
Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

Why should the President agree to testify under oath before Democrats when former FBI agent Page testified the FBI illegally conducted its own investigation of Trump for collusion BEFORE the official investigation began and found ZERO EVIDENCE, ZERO CRIME, AND ZERO COLLUSION...yet the FBI collaborated with Barry's DOJ, NSA, CIA, Trump-hating foreign spies working with the FBI, and Russians - illegally using Hillary's bought and paid for 'unreliable' document to illegally obtain warrants and open an investigation of a crime they already knew never happened?

The ONLY ones who should be testifying under oath before Congress is the exposed conspirators behind the proven coup.
That reminds me, How on Earth was Mills, Rice and Lynch able to avoid appearing before a Hearing when they were requested to appear? Same with Powers and Yates?

Obama officials blocked it while they were still in power. These people need to be looked at again.
It reminds me how evidence shows Russian interference began in 2014, how Obama knew about it yet allowed it to continue for 2 years, and Mueller and the Democrats - demanding an investigation of Russian interference in 2016 - completely avoided investigating where / when it all began....in 2014 under Obama who, again, knew about it yet allowed it to continue.

I have said this and I will say it again. Obama invited Putin to help him defeat Trump. This is how The Dirty Russian Dossier came to be.

A lot of things that don't makes sense, only make sense when looked at in this light. Much of the stuff imo were false flag attacks intentionally designed to be used to blame shift and for propaganda purposes only. This is why Obama gave a wink and a nod to everything Putin was doing.

The only difference being is that when they started the operation around 2014, they did not know at the time who the GOP nominee was. Once that was determined, everything was refocused on President Trump, and personalized towards him.
 
The President called on the US AG to release all the information he legally can,

Trumpybear lies all the time. He also said he "Wanted" to testify under oath to the Mueller team.

If you believed that, I have some nice land in East Texas I'l like to sell you.......
Yet he did so, you know it, and here we are with you lying your ass off and spinning when you get busted...

Trumpybear did not testify under oath.

It's a fine patch of land. A little swampy when it rains, but heck, it hardly ever rains in the Piney Woods.......
So what? It's his right not too and he didn't, sorry your perjury trap didn't work......Trump is smarter than you lefties.......#winning
 

Forum List

Back
Top