Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam

Are you ever going to identify the lies you say I've told?
Between that and you denying you'd said something that was hovering right over the field in which you denied it, I'd say the person with zero credibility is....

well, you.

So you DO want me to go thru this thread....I asked twice already and you did not answer. I will take it for a yes now....I will get to work right away.

I didn't realize you needed my permission.

Get to work. Remember..you're proving that I lied and flip flopped. Don't come back with a bunch of garbage that has nothing to do with my so called lies or flip flopping or you'll just prove you were lying yourself.

I could find the posts if you would like but you have demanded that those on the left prove their own arguments even as you defended logical for not providing anything of substance to back up his.

How is that for a dose of hypocrisy and flip flopping??
 
They were not cleared.....That is a myth. as explained in the following:
BAY AREA / Berkeley does Guantanamo

And, the lil' code pinker did put out an invite, along with several other lib's in that bastion of idiocy. They are the ones who pushed it up for a vote, after putting out an invite!

The Berkley city council.

mortenson_with_elders_taliban.jpg


Is that drsmith huddled by the fire?
 
Is it? Or is that just what you tell yourself to make yourself feel more.....better?

Your game is to fling shit.

I once thought that you fling shit in hopes of distracting from the critique of Islam and Sharia. I'm no longer sure of that. It appears that you have no actual cognition, you fling shit by rote. A smelly baboon, shrieking and clamoring about with no sense of purpose.

olive-baboon.jpg

It's pretty evident that you really, really didn't like me linking your own lies back at you. So, I will just chalk your baboon imagery to you going personal because that's pretty much all you've got.

Bod lie. She didn't link any lies...
 
So you DO want me to go thru this thread....I asked twice already and you did not answer. I will take it for a yes now....I will get to work right away.

I didn't realize you needed my permission.

Get to work. Remember..you're proving that I lied and flip flopped. Don't come back with a bunch of garbage that has nothing to do with my so called lies or flip flopping or you'll just prove you were lying yourself.

I could find the posts if you would like but you have demanded that those on the left prove their own arguments even as you defended logical for not providing anything of substance to back up his.

How is that for a dose of hypocrisy and flip flopping??

Nope.

The accusation was that I lied and flip flopped.

Not that I was a hypocrite and didn't provide substance after asking for it from others. Which is of course a lie.

So go ahead and round up those lies. I'm sure they're all over the place, lol.

And show where I flip-flopped, i.e., reversed directions on a topic.
 
"Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam" the above is living proof.

So the fact that he doesn't mention radical islam at all somehow proves that democrats trivialize the threat from radical islam?? REALLY??? Are you sure about that?? LOL

WOW!



The ENTIRE premise of this thread is what is in Allie, and Uncensored, and now Wicked Jester's heads. That's it. They IMAGINE therefore it must be. Period. End of subject. They don't need no stinking proof.
So Butch, show where I stated that all dem's trivialize the threat of Islam......You can't do it. But, there are liberal democrats who do trivialize it, and you cannot deny that!......Cases in point, Rita Maran, Linda Maio, and many other liberal idiots in this great country!
 
Bodey's one of those lil' neg rep cowards?

Who'd a thunk it!

LMAO!

:lol::lol:

Well, of course, when your hang your hat on something that Allie says, you get burned.

:lol::lol:
Are you ever going to identify the lies you say I've told?

Between that and you denying you'd said something that was hovering right over the field in which you denied it, I'd say the person with zero credibility is....

well, you.

Bod did identify one lie that you made about her and I pointed out how you skipped that post and did not respond to it. Then after being called out for skipping it you avoided it AGAIN.

Here is the post again

Why do you care whether I read the bible or not? Apparently I am owning a tremendous amount of space in your head right now. Should I be flattered?

Why would you criticize a document you aren't familiar with?
Are you trying to look stupid?

Who said I was criticizing the bible?

Who said I was unfamiliar with it?


Seems to me you have JUST provided me with some prime examples of your lying and misrepresentations in that post right there. Thank you.

So care to explain?
 
The ENTIRE premise of this thread is what is in Allie, and Uncensored, and now Wicked Jester's heads.

Really?

I thought it was about you fucknut leftists trivializing the threat of radical Islam...

Of course, should we do a thread about what is in drsmith and your head it will be zero pages in length....

So another Bod lie. She is lying about the premise of the thread.

Which is of course that libs trivialize the threat of Islam. It's pretty clearly defined in the TITLE.

Please, Bod...please tell us now, what have you determined the premise of the OP is? Lol...you're good at pretending the written word means something completely different than what is actually written (which means...lie)
 
:lol::lol:

Well, of course, when your hang your hat on something that Allie says, you get burned.

:lol::lol:
Are you ever going to identify the lies you say I've told?

Between that and you denying you'd said something that was hovering right over the field in which you denied it, I'd say the person with zero credibility is....

well, you.

Bod did identify one lie that you made about her and I pointed out how you skipped that post and did not respond to it. Then after being called out for skipping it you avoided it AGAIN.

Here is the post again

Why would you criticize a document you aren't familiar with?
Are you trying to look stupid?

Who said I was criticizing the bible?

Who said I was unfamiliar with it?


Seems to me you have JUST provided me with some prime examples of your lying and misrepresentations in that post right there. Thank you.

So care to explain?

Since when does a QUESTION qualify as a LIE, you nincompoop???

You people really don't know what a lie is, do you? That explains a lot.
 
Let's look at Allie's posts in this thread....and how they contradict, lie and make false assumptions with no proof:

pgs 1-41:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481307-post613.html (your first post in this thread...saying that every country dominated by Muslims is a shithole)

pgs 42 -63:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481375-post618.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481455-post626.html (saying that Islam embraces its monsters...)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481650-post637.html (saying that terrorism IS symptomatic of Islam)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481687-post640.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3482127-post679.html (first blatant lie in the thread stating that I believe it is bigotted to speak out against barbarism, corruption, human rights violations and oppression)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3482154-post684.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3482157-post686.html (saying that Islam fosters human rights violations)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3482168-post688.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3482190-post694.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3482791-post723.html (the most autobiographical of all of Allie's posts in this thread)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3483990-post729.html (doesn't know what a 'red herring' is)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3483997-post730.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484010-post731.html (Suddenly pretending that it is important to stick to the subject)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484049-post734.html (then going off subject in her very next post)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484058-post736.html (again expressing concern that posts be on subject)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484084-post740.html (confused)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484089-post741.html (starts talking about her dog farting)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484104-post743.html (says another poster is on crack)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484109-post745.html (accuses another of vague meaningless posts)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484155-post748.html (waiting for a single substantive post from person unknown since there is no quote...perhaps self-reflection?)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484175-post751.html (more complaints about another poster's posting style...with no commentary on content...heavy use of the word "garbage")

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484258-post758.html (talking about Nazis)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484268-post760.html (more vague complains about persons unknown being on drugs or schizophrenic. No quote to know who she is talking to...perhaps more self-reflection?)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484296-post762.html (again, more complaints about persons unknown posting style...no content, just complaints about style)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484316-post765.html (more about Nazis to persons unknown)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484486-post775.html (apparently likes Lewis Carroll)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484513-post778.html (foul mouth swearing and more about Nazis)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484520-post779.html (baby dolls?)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484644-post788.html (complaining about my posting now...says she'll have a party)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484721-post793.html (says a poster hasn't said anything...apparently the poster she has spent several posts complaining about.....)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3484729-post794.html (arguing about agnostics and atheism now)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485102-post812.html (more about Nazis, complaining about posting style of the poster she said "hasn't said anything"

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485115-post815.html (seems confused as to posters' names and puts things in quotes that were never said....somehow thinking that proves her.....point)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485167-post817.html (nice personal shot at me out of the blue)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485202-post820.html (still confused as to meaning of "red herring")

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485208-post821.html (starts wandering off about the British and Muslims)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485210-post823.htmlm ("Wow that was weird")

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485214-post824.html (still misuses "red herring" and expands vocabulary to "ad hominem")

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485494-post829.html (actually talks about Muslims again and compares them to keeping Mormons in line)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485592-post832.html (Islam is hate group)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485931-post847.html (complaining again about me posting)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3485931-post847.html (personal shot again, no context)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3486125-post854.html (smilies)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3486125-post854.html (knows something)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3486275-post858.html (lol)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3486377-post860.html (Hitler)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3486527-post862.html (compares slavery in the South to Islam)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3486527-post862.html (advocates law enforcement harassing Muslims, says that terrorist training camps get broken up...she knows it tho it NEVER makes the news, then accuses me of being pro-terrorist ...blatant lie)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3487608-post872.html (burka outlawed)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3487608-post872.html (want's burka outlawed to harass Muslims)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3487932-post878.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3488484-post883.html (foul language at persons unknown)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3488566-post885.html (seems to think that someone said America deserved to be attacked by Islam)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3488823-post889.html (accuses persons unknown supporting acts of terrorist....probably a blatant lie because no one at USMB supports acts of terrorism)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3490172-post900.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491222-post919.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491228-post921.html (seems to think we do not have enough attacks)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491234-post923.html (somehow we get on Sweden)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491240-post924.html (and Finland and anti-semitism)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491244-post926.html (more on anti-semitism)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491249-post928.html (says a poster wants to kill all Christians and is a terrorist with no evidence, just lying about someone to insult)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491254-post929.html (back to anti-semitism)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491268-post931.html (more cut n' past on anti-semitism)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491270-post932.html (reiterates comment on someone being a terrorist)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491281-post933.html (addresses me suddenly asking which anti-semitic community I would like us to take after... lying as to me being anti-semitic...)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491281-post933.html (more cut n' paste on anti-semitism, after calling another poster pro-terrorist, which is a lie)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491342-post937.html (self-reflection)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491347-post938.html (into sodomizing goats????)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491440-post940.html (displays foul mouth)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3491444-post941.html (more self-reflection?)

More in next post.
 
Last edited:
Here:

"
Definition of QUESTION

1
a (1) : an interrogative expression often used to test knowledge (2) : an interrogative sentence or clause b : a subject or aspect in dispute or open for discussion : issue; broadly : problem, matter c (1) : a subject or point of debate or a proposition to be voted on in a meeting (2) : the bringing of such to a vote d : the specific point at issue

2
a : an act or instance of asking : inquiry b : interrogation; also : a judicial or official investigation c : torture as part of an examination d (1) : objection, dispute <true beyond question> (2) : room for doubt or objection <little question of his skill> (3) : chance, possibility <no question of escape> "
Question - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Lie:

liedly·ing \&#712;l&#299;-i&#331;\
Definition of LIE

intransitive verb
1
: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive

2
: to create a false or misleading impression
Lie - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

You understand that a question is pretty much the opposite of a statement, and a lie is a statement made with the intent to deceive?

You did know that.

Right? My 7 & 8 year olds know the difference between a question and a statement, and a lie and a question....
 
Here ya' go Dr.......There's my original quote, lil' man.

Now, show me where I was wrong.

I'll say it again:

LIB'S in Berkeley DID invite them to come live in their community.....Are you telling me that those who put it up for vote weren't LIBERALS?........They sure as hell weren't Con's living in BERKELEY!

LMAO!

Oh, and since you are trying to say that I twisted Booboo's words, I don't see you holding him accountable for doing the same to mine.........And we know why, you dishonest hack!......And I see you are trying to twist my words, by claiming that no liberals in Berkeley invited them to come live with them. When in fact, YES THEY DID!


:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You're such a fuckin' tool!

You were talking about berkely inviting them when it was dependent on the resolution which FAILED to pass which means they were NOT invited.

BTW according to your own source the TWO gitmo detainees in question, whose invitation was dependent on the resolution, were cleared so how were they radical muslims?? Do you have any proof of this claim or are you in the same boat with the other two hacks who are trying to argue that ALL muslims are radical??

Still waiting on you to prove that either of the TWO CLEARED gitmo detainees was actually invited to live in the berkeley community. Due to the fact that according to your own source
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnOwsmZZhiw]YouTube - Sean Hannity Fox News Berkeley Code Pink Wacko Wants Guantanamo Detainees Dating Her Cousin[/ame]

the invite was dependent on the passage of the resolution and the resolution failed I don't see how you can prove that they were invited anyway.
They were not cleared.....That is a myth. as explained in the following:
BAY AREA / Berkeley does Guantanamo

Your source, hannity himself, stated that they were cleared so if your source is wrong about that what else are they wrong about and what do you have to substantiate your claims now?? LOL

And, the lil' code pinker did put out an invite, along with several other lib's in that bastion of idiocy. They are the ones who pushed it up for a vote, after putting out an invite!

Thanks for the OPINION now where is the proof?? repitition doesn't make it so. Can you PROVE your claim that these two were invited even though the resolution that the invite was dependent on was rejected??

I noticed that you failed to address my questions AGAIN so I have to ask another that you will be too scared to answer, what are you afraid of??
 
So you DO want me to go thru this thread....I asked twice already and you did not answer. I will take it for a yes now....I will get to work right away.

I didn't realize you needed my permission.

Get to work. Remember..you're proving that I lied and flip flopped. Don't come back with a bunch of garbage that has nothing to do with my so called lies or flip flopping or you'll just prove you were lying yourself.

I could find the posts if you would like but you have demanded that those on the left prove their own arguments even as you defended logical for not providing anything of substance to back up his.

How is that for a dose of hypocrisy and flip flopping??
So, you just came back with more garbage just like Allie predicted.

Too fuckin' funny!:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Watching an idiot like you get pawned is highly entertaining!

:popcorn::alcoholic::popcorn::alcoholic::popcorn::420::alcoholic::popcorn::piss2:
 
Last edited:
"Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam" the above is living proof.

So the fact that he doesn't mention radical islam at all somehow proves that democrats trivialize the threat from radical islam?? REALLY??? Are you sure about that?? LOL

WOW!



The ENTIRE premise of this thread is what is in Allie, and Uncensored, and now Wicked Jester's heads. That's it. They IMAGINE therefore it must be. Period. End of subject. They don't need no stinking proof.

Exactly, and I noticed how they edited your post and tookonly the first sentence out of the context of the whole. What else can you expect from a bunch of dishonest rightwing hacks who refuse to acknowledge the truth??
 
She's not going to do anything except further humiliate herself.

If she does post anything, it will be completely unrelated to her claim. Smith is already trying, by changing the challenge to proving "hypocrisy" instead of providing evidence of "lies". And the hypocrisy, rather than being untruthfulness or flip-flopping, is based on the fact that I ask for verification of the wilder statements made by the baboon troop. Yeah, that's certainly evidence of lying and flip flopping, lol.

Bod & Smith:

baboon0247.jpg
 
Let's look at Allie's posts in this thread....and how they contradict, lie and make false assumptions with no proof:

pgs 1-41:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481307-post613.html (your first post in this thread...saying that every country dominated by Muslims is a shithole)

How is that a lie, stupid fuck?


Where is the lie, stupid fuck?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481455-post626.html (saying that Islam embraces its monsters...)

It does, stupid fuck.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481650-post637.html (saying that terrorism IS symptomatic of Islam)

It is, stupid fuck.

No lies by Allie, but you're a desperate fool and a fucking liar.
 
Let's look at Allie's posts in this thread....and how they contradict, lie and make false assumptions with no proof:

pgs 1-41:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481307-post613.html (your first post in this thread...saying that every country dominated by Muslims is a shithole)

pgs 42 -84:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481375-post618.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481455-post626.html (saying that Islam embraces its monsters...)

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3481650-post637.html (saying that terrorism IS symptomatic of Islam)

Er...where are the lies?

And the flip flopping?

Like I said, I expected you to come back with a bunch of garbage. And that's what you've done. You've rounded up statements you don't agree with, and posted them as evidence of lying.

:clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
You were talking about berkely inviting them when it was dependent on the resolution which FAILED to pass which means they were NOT invited.

BTW according to your own source the TWO gitmo detainees in question, whose invitation was dependent on the resolution, were cleared so how were they radical muslims?? Do you have any proof of this claim or are you in the same boat with the other two hacks who are trying to argue that ALL muslims are radical??

Still waiting on you to prove that either of the TWO CLEARED gitmo detainees was actually invited to live in the berkeley community. Due to the fact that according to your own source
YouTube - Sean Hannity Fox News Berkeley Code Pink Wacko Wants Guantanamo Detainees Dating Her Cousin

the invite was dependent on the passage of the resolution and the resolution failed I don't see how you can prove that they were invited anyway.
They were not cleared.....That is a myth. as explained in the following:
BAY AREA / Berkeley does Guantanamo

Your source, hannity himself, stated that they were cleared so if your source is wrong about that what else are they wrong about and what do you have to substantiate your claims now?? LOL

And, the lil' code pinker did put out an invite, along with several other lib's in that bastion of idiocy. They are the ones who pushed it up for a vote, after putting out an invite!

Thanks for the OPINION now where is the proof?? repitition doesn't make it so. Can you PROVE your claim that these two were invited even though the resolution that the invite was dependent on was rejected??

I noticed that you failed to address my questions AGAIN so I have to ask another that you will be too scared to answer, what are you afraid of??
My source, the article I linked, clearly shows that they have not been cleared, X-ray boy.

No detainees have been "cleared"....Damn you would think that two stupid liberal idiots like Maran and Maio would have made sure they were actually CLEARED before making invites and putting the invites up for a vote.

Oh well, Liberals are fucking idiots so, it should come as no surprise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top