Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam

Phelps ran for office 5 times in the 90's and never got more than 15% of the vote. Democrats are smart,

Aren't YOU a democrat? (Kinda kills THAT theory..)

and know when a maniacal imposter comes sniffing around.

Cough-cough... Obama....

Unlike morAnic cons like you, I realize that there are a lot of ignorant Democrats that have always tried to run. And they usually lost. You, on the other hand, are willing to ignore the damage done by the brainwashed, er UNwashed clowns who have tried to tear down everything the founders intended.
 
The idea of the "cross" was an innovation that was introduced to the Christian community several hundred years later. :cool:

You're full of shit.

{Crucifixion was in use particularly among the Seleucids, Carthaginians, and Romans from about the 6th century BC to the 4th century AD. In the year 337, Emperor Constantine I abolished it in the Roman Empire, out of veneration for Jesus Christ, the most famous victim of crucifixion.[2][3] It was also used as a form of execution in Japan for criminals, inflicted also on some Christians.}

Crucifixion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You sure do rely on Wikipedia a lot for your information. And here I thought Wikipedia was just a leftist encyclopedia full of edited facts. At least that's what most righties claim.
He does't realize that I was a lay Preacher before converting to Islam.

So he has meet his match when it comes to debating the Bible. :eusa_angel:
 
UC only linked pages 1-18. If he had bothered to read the whole thing, in the last section, he would have seen this:

How many people do you think were in Germany, Maggie? More or less than 50?

ROFL

Math ain't your strong suit, is it? Actually, you don't have a strong suit.

(I hope you're good looking, cause everyone needs SOMETHING going for them...)

You're such an adolescent fratboy. Grow the fuck up.
 
The "original" New Testament was written in Greek; not Latin

And used the word "Tau," which is "cross."

What is your point?

Again, the word "cross" is not used in the original Bible.

Your claim is false.

Who the hell determined "tau" meant "cross"??

CROSS in the Bible Encyclopedia - ISBE (Bible History Online)
The name is not found in the Old Testament. It is derived from the Latin word crux. In the Greek language it is stauros, but sometimes we find the word skolops used as its Greek equivalent.
 
You mean there are double meanings to certain words in The Bible, interpreted by future "scholars" deemed appropriate for the time? Kinda like "17 virgins" in The Quran is merely someone's interpretation of something else? Imagine that...

You are a complete dumbass. (I know, and water is wet.)

It's 72 Houri, not 17 - and it comes from the Hadith al-Bukhari, not the Koran. Bukhari IS canon, though. (Not all Hadiths are.)

As far as the Houri being virgins, that DOES come from the Koran.

Surah 78:31
As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens and vineyards, and high- bosomed virgins for companions: a truly overflowing cup.
 
Because the left are anti-american socialist idiots that hate what this country was founded on. If they say different they are lying because they prove it all the time, like voting in obamaturd who is the worst president in history.

Awe, AmericanFirst has become a anti-American turd.
 
You're full of shit.

{Crucifixion was in use particularly among the Seleucids, Carthaginians, and Romans from about the 6th century BC to the 4th century AD. In the year 337, Emperor Constantine I abolished it in the Roman Empire, out of veneration for Jesus Christ, the most famous victim of crucifixion.[2][3] It was also used as a form of execution in Japan for criminals, inflicted also on some Christians.}

Crucifixion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You sure do rely on Wikipedia a lot for your information. And here I thought Wikipedia was just a leftist encyclopedia full of edited facts. At least that's what most righties claim.
He does't realize that I was a lay Preacher before converting to Islam.

So he has meet his match when it comes to debating the Bible. :eusa_angel:

Unfortunately, I think you're wasting your time trying to educate such a bigot. I know I am (sick of trying to educate him), and I'm no scholar of either religion. I'm just your basic avid reader of both sides of any issue, and my opinions are formed using plain ol' common sense.
 
Last edited:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVh5amMncD0]YouTube - Prison Recruitment to Radical Islam[/ame]
 
what exactly is the threat, really?
Remember 911? Clinton asked that same stupid question, but he was spineless also.

What a turd. President Bush was in office for nearly 8 months on 9-11-01. That was the question he asked the transition team when they informed him that the greatest threat comes from terrorist not rougue nations lobbing balistic missiles at us.

As we all now know, the Bush administration turned a deaf ear to the advice of the departing Clinton Administration.
 
You sure do rely on Wikipedia a lot for your information. And here I thought Wikipedia was just a leftist encyclopedia full of edited facts. At least that's what most righties claim.

I wrote a paper on Wiki and tested it against the Encyclopedia Britannica. Wikipedia had a higher rate of accuracy. There are a lot of eyes leading to a lot of fact checking. (Not that you know what a "fact" is...)
 
I live in America.

But I am sure that you think we all look alike. :doubt:

Yes, because a Muslim from Croatia is bound to look identical to a Muslim from Sudan, or Indonesia....

But but but aren't the dark-skinned Muslims integrating with white-skinned Commies? According to Glennie, they will soon form a partnership for a New World Order and we're all gonners. We won't know who the enemy is just by profiling anymore. :(
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMLJJEDDDGc]YouTube - Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West (1 of 10)[/ame]
 
How many times does the left have to denounce punishing rape victims, or public stonings to satify you?

Once would be a real good start - of course you MIGHT offend your allies, so you'll have to couch it in PC double-talk and apologetics. You don't want to offend CAIR or Al Qaeda.

Since you didn't use the comple quote from my post, leaving out the "Hmmm, give a number would you, then subtract 1 from it. Both practices should be abolished." I'll assume that you want to pretend that I didn't post it.

If it offend my allies, fuck'um. If you think(the bold part) is PC double talk, fuck you. In general principle, fuck you, Cair, and al Queda too.
 
Unlike morAnic cons like you, I realize that there are a lot of ignorant Democrats

What a coincidence; I'm conversing with one right now...

You, on the other hand, are willing to ignore the damage done by the brainwashed

Yep, I am the one ignoring the damage done...

wtc_9-11.jpg
 
You said Tea Partiers, not me. I was referring to the idiots in the pics you put in your post.

I know.

You would certainly never call Muslims "idiots," so it's obvious that you refer to the vile creature who DARES to oppose bailouts for Obama's massahs at Goldman Sachs.

obama_goldman_sachs_bumper_sticker-p128769938233805158trl0_400.jpg


You know, the idiot muslims you seem to think (or are lying about) I embrace.

My opinion on WHY you defend and support radical Islam is that you share a common enemy with them - Americans.

See what happens when you try to speak for others? You end up looking more the fool than you already look.

I'm beginning to feel sorry for you. You've obviously got some issues, emotional or mental...maybe both. And I say that in all concern.
 
[
He does't realize that I was a lay Preacher before converting to Islam.

That is irrelevant. What you claim is false. That is the pertinent point.

So he has meet his match when it comes to debating the Bible. :eusa_angel:

We aren't "debating" the Bible. You lied, I exposed - that's the long and short of it.
 
Yeah.....:lol::lol::lol: I can understand why you guys keep saying that. I'd be embarrassed to by such a reactionary group.

Fred Phelps is a registered democrat. The church ran a "get out the vote" campaign for Obama.

Oh, and here's a hint, it wasn't the right spitting on troops returning from Vietnam - who do you SERIOUSLY think is going to piss of the graves of our war dead? Yep, that would be the dims...

BRACE YOURSELVES: Democrat Fred Phelps and Westboro Hate Group announce plans to picket 9-year-old shooting victim Christina Greene’s funeral. A new low for Democrat hate groups. « HillBuzz.org

Phelps ran for office 5 times in the 90's and never got more than 15% of the vote. Democrats are smart, and know when a maniacal imposter comes sniffing around. It wouldn't matter what his political affiliation in the past has been. The creep is about as UnAmerican as they come.

That picture cracks me up....anyone who has seen Fred Phelps talk KNOW that's not him in the picture...yet it keeps getting passed around. Those who fall for it must be very stupid indeed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top