Why do RWs spend so much energy on demonizing democrats yet make no effort to defend republicans?

[P@triot]

Lol what a crock of shit. You posted an article citing Rush Limbaugh who cited a republican. How about you find a non partisan source and show what it was spent on?

This was directly from Senator Tom Coburn's (OK) website. Every year he tracked and published reports on government spending. He made a special one just for the Obama "stimulus package":

1. Forest Service to Replace Windows in Visitor Center Closed in 2007 (Amboy, WA) - $554,763
Despite having no plans to reopen a shuttered visitor center at Mount St. Helens in Washington State, the U.S. Forest Service is spending more than $554,000 to replace its windows.

2. “Dance Draw” - Interactive Dance Software Development (Charlotte, NC) - $762,372
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte received more than $760,000 in stimulus funds to help develop a computerized choreography program that its creators believe could lead to a YouTube-like “Dance Tube” online application.

3. North Shore Connector to Professional Sports Stadiums, Casino (Pittsburgh, PA) - $62 million
ederal money has covered the vast majority of costs, with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) agreeing to provide $348 million—nearly the full original cost—leaving state and local governments responsible for a small fraction.30 Even with that level of assistance, the Port Authority still threatened to shut down the project due to the enormous cost overruns. With an infusion of more than $62 million in stimulus money, the project was taken off life support.

4. FEMA Stalls Two Fire Stations More Than a Year, Increases Costs (San Antonio, TX) - $7.3 million
The City of San Antonio is hoping that there aren’t any fires for at least a year in the vicinity of two planned fire stations, thanks to “help” from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

5. Abandoned Train Station Converted Into Museum (Glassboro, NJ) - $1.2 million
Taxpayers may not be happy to learn that they are paying for one broken down train station twice. The Glassboro train station was built in 1860 and closed in 1971. Unused for nearly 40 years, it now sits boarded up and riddled with graffiti.

6. Ants Talk. Taxpayers Listen (San Francisco, CA) - $1.9 million
The California Academy of Sciences is receiving nearly $2 million to send researchers to the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands and east Africa, to capture, photograph, and analyze thousands of exotic ants.

7. Stimulus Project Threatens Pastor’s House (Newark, OH) - $1.8 million
An Ohio road project received $1.8 million in stimulus funds,56 despite the threat it poses to the residents of over two dozen homes next to it. Pastor Greg Sheets of Newark, Ohio’s Truth Tabernacle 57 has already lost his front yard to the project, and could lose his entire home.

8. Old Abandoned Iron Furnace Gets Facelift after Money Squandered on Same Project Years Before (Fitchburg, KY) – $357,710
Once considered ahead of its time, the Fitchburg Furnace in Kentucky was abandoned after just five years in service—it then sat unused for nearly 140 more. Now it is getting a $357,710 makeover to repair stonework on the old structure and allow historians to conduct research.

9. Power Plant Construction Won’t Start for at Least Two Years (Kern County, CA) - $308 million
BP may have found itself staring down huge financial losses over the past several months, but executives can take solace knowing that a stimulus windfall will help offset them. On September 28, 2009, Hydrogen Energy California, LLC (HECA), owned largely by BP, was awarded $308 million86 in stimulus funds to “generate more environmentally friendly electricity by capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.”

10. Town Replaces New Sidewalks With Newer Sidewalks That Lead to Ditch (Boynton, OK) - $89,298
People around Boynton, Oklahoma were left scratching their heads after the town was awarded nearly $90,00096 to replace a quarter-mile stretch of sidewalk that was replaced only five years ago. Another resident, Mike Lance, noted that “the best indication of the absurdity of the project is what the contractor did with a section of sidewalk at the north end of town – one that fronts no homes or businesses, and leads directly into a ditch.”

It goes up to 100 Billy000. Let me know if you want me to post the rest.

Would you agree 000 that none of this is even remotely helpful to the U.S?

Some Of it was wasted, sure. No doubt. Most did a lot.

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

 

[Billy000]

This was directly from Senator Tom Coburn's (OK) website. Every year he tracked and published reports on government spending. He made a special one just for the Obama "stimulus package":

1. Forest Service to Replace Windows in Visitor Center Closed in 2007 (Amboy, WA) - $554,763
Despite having no plans to reopen a shuttered visitor center at Mount St. Helens in Washington State, the U.S. Forest Service is spending more than $554,000 to replace its windows.

2. “Dance Draw” - Interactive Dance Software Development (Charlotte, NC) - $762,372
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte received more than $760,000 in stimulus funds to help develop a computerized choreography program that its creators believe could lead to a YouTube-like “Dance Tube” online application.

3. North Shore Connector to Professional Sports Stadiums, Casino (Pittsburgh, PA) - $62 million
ederal money has covered the vast majority of costs, with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) agreeing to provide $348 million—nearly the full original cost—leaving state and local governments responsible for a small fraction.30 Even with that level of assistance, the Port Authority still threatened to shut down the project due to the enormous cost overruns. With an infusion of more than $62 million in stimulus money, the project was taken off life support.

4. FEMA Stalls Two Fire Stations More Than a Year, Increases Costs (San Antonio, TX) - $7.3 million
The City of San Antonio is hoping that there aren’t any fires for at least a year in the vicinity of two planned fire stations, thanks to “help” from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

5. Abandoned Train Station Converted Into Museum (Glassboro, NJ) - $1.2 million
Taxpayers may not be happy to learn that they are paying for one broken down train station twice. The Glassboro train station was built in 1860 and closed in 1971. Unused for nearly 40 years, it now sits boarded up and riddled with graffiti.

6. Ants Talk. Taxpayers Listen (San Francisco, CA) - $1.9 million
The California Academy of Sciences is receiving nearly $2 million to send researchers to the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands and east Africa, to capture, photograph, and analyze thousands of exotic ants.

7. Stimulus Project Threatens Pastor’s House (Newark, OH) - $1.8 million
An Ohio road project received $1.8 million in stimulus funds,56 despite the threat it poses to the residents of over two dozen homes next to it. Pastor Greg Sheets of Newark, Ohio’s Truth Tabernacle 57 has already lost his front yard to the project, and could lose his entire home.

8. Old Abandoned Iron Furnace Gets Facelift after Money Squandered on Same Project Years Before (Fitchburg, KY) – $357,710
Once considered ahead of its time, the Fitchburg Furnace in Kentucky was abandoned after just five years in service—it then sat unused for nearly 140 more. Now it is getting a $357,710 makeover to repair stonework on the old structure and allow historians to conduct research.

9. Power Plant Construction Won’t Start for at Least Two Years (Kern County, CA) - $308 million
BP may have found itself staring down huge financial losses over the past several months, but executives can take solace knowing that a stimulus windfall will help offset them. On September 28, 2009, Hydrogen Energy California, LLC (HECA), owned largely by BP, was awarded $308 million86 in stimulus funds to “generate more environmentally friendly electricity by capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.”

10. Town Replaces New Sidewalks With Newer Sidewalks That Lead to Ditch (Boynton, OK) - $89,298
People around Boynton, Oklahoma were left scratching their heads after the town was awarded nearly $90,00096 to replace a quarter-mile stretch of sidewalk that was replaced only five years ago. Another resident, Mike Lance, noted that “the best indication of the absurdity of the project is what the contractor did with a section of sidewalk at the north end of town – one that fronts no homes or businesses, and leads directly into a ditch.”

It goes up to 100 Billy000. Let me know if you want me to post the rest.

Would you agree 000 that none of this is even remotely helpful to the U.S?

Some Of it was wasted, sure. No doubt. Most did a lot.

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Would you agree 000 that none of this is even remotely helpful to the U.S?

Some Of it was wasted, sure. No doubt. Most did a lot.

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

So what your saying is Obama stole Bush Jr plan and Bush tax cuts worked.....check.


Thanks for playing


.

 

[P@triot]

Would you agree 000 that none of this is even remotely helpful to the U.S?

Some Of it was wasted, sure. No doubt. Most did a lot.

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

Now you're just being a desperate hack. A "retarded Republican"? He was a U.S. Senator tracking government spending for his constituents. Ultimately you can provide a single example of where the money was spent properly but rather than just admit that you act like a 4th grader with the "retards Republican" nonsense.

 

[P@triot]

The key difference between repubs and dems is that dems actually push policies to help the country as a whole.

Here is $35 million of the American people's money once again being wasted by Democrats. Honeybees on cocaine? Jesus Christ's face on toast? Sexy goldfish? Are these Dumbocrat policies "helping the country as a whole"? You've been completely duped by the liberal ideology and you just can't bring yourself to accept it.

"What do honeybees on cocaine, drunken songbirds, and sexy goldfish have in common? Each was the subject of extensive, taxpayer-funded research and each features prominently in Sen. Jeff Flake’s most recent expose on government waste.

It did not, however, keep the NIH from spending part of its $32 billion budget to study the appearance of Jesus Christ’s face on toast, the musical preferences of monkeys, and the contagious nature of yawning.

Flake, who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health, argues that the funding would be better deployed to find “treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and viral infections such as Zika and Ebola.”

“When federal agencies don’t spend our limited research dollars wisely,” Flake said, “they’re not just wasting money, they’re missing opportunities, and we can’t afford either.”

NIH Spent $35 Million on ‘Head-Scratching’ Research

 

[kaz]

Treating gay couples the same as everyone else isn't treating them with "respect."

That was my point I made before. When a guy sticks his prick in another guy's ass, you're like OMG, we have to reward them for that, we have to give them party favors. We can't treat them like everyone else.

There's something seriously wrong with you that you think treating gays like everyone else isn't treating them with respect. Seriously. Think about it. But don't hurt yourself, I know you're not used to thinking

You are so fucking stupid. I said NOTHING about giving them more than straight people. Nada. No special rights. No priveleges.

Moron.

So you don't know that government marriage comes with perks? OMG, you seriously are S-T-U-P-I-D. My God man, it's sad

Yep. Same perks that straight people get it. This isn't hard to figure out.

I see, so you're arguing the position you disagree with other people on because you're such a retard that you can't grasp that I don't want to give straights any perks over gays either.

Fine, let's go there. Stop being a Christian zealot who thinks everyone who isn't a bible thumping intolerant bigot isn't going to heaven. I mean I know that's not your view. But according to you I'm responsible for views that I disagree with that someone else said. So fuck you, you own Pat Robertson.

Moron

Christ stop pretending you didn't say "fag" and "abomination" earlier and MEAN IT.

LOL, anything it takes for you to divert from that you want to discriminate between American citizens and I want government to treat us all the same, be they fag, dyke or normal

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

I mean sure they support certain candidates for some bizarre reason, but it doesn't take much scrutiny to realize republicans in office do not do jack shit for the middle class and poor. That's why as a party, RWs make no effort in their defense for voting for them. They know there's no justification for it. It's just easier to shit all over the democrats. In the end you have to wonder why RWs even vote at all.

You are partially correct Billy000, at least as far as this RW is concerned. I don't defend GOPers because I think they are horribly ineffective in advancing the conservative agenda. I am disgusted by the whole lot of the incumbents, from the leadership on down.

However you will have to explain to me why under Obama the wealth gap has exploded. The middle class has gotten smaller under this guy, the rich have gotten much richer. Yet it is the evil Republicans that don't care about the middle class? I am scratching my head.

Tell me, what specifically should Obama have done to close the wealth gap?

No, I won't tell you what he should have done to close the wealth gap. Not until you tell me why the wealth gap has grown under his presidency, like I asked you to in my first post.

Because there was no government intervention on the market it to keep it from widening. Now you tell me what he should have done.

"Because there was no government interventions on the market to keep it from widening". ok, if that's your answer, then I will say.....he should,have intervened to keep,it from widening. (I can't believe I am having this conversation with you, I know better.)

 

[kaz]

Right. The fight against gay rights such as marriage screams freedom! How do you explain the Patriot Act?

There is no "right" to government marriage, the only right you have is to be left alone. You have no right to demand anything from other people. Positive rights are an oxymoron. You're just a plain moron

So...the government has no place sanctioning heterosexual marriage then?

Well....the federal government. The people of each state get to decide whether or not they want to recognize gay marriage. Sorry...it's just a fact. The U.S. Constitution says so.

Lol no the constitution makes no mention of gay marriage. Nice try though.

I guess slavery is OK to. And women can vote, why?

They are in the Constitution, gay marriage isn't. What conclusion do you draw from that? LOL, don't worry, that was a rhetorical question. I know you're an idiot

 

[kaz]

I don't defend the Patriot Act at all. It was yet another liberty destroying policy by yet another liberal. You seem to think there are no liberals in the Republican party when in fact the overwhelming majority of the party is made up of liberals.

Also, there is no fight against "gay rights". At all. Every homosexual is allowed to carry a gun, vote, practice their own religion, etc.

Exactly. What Billy Zero wants is to provide gays with extra money to tell them that they're gay and it's OK

No I don't.

You just said you wanted to give gays tax breaks and perks for pairing up. Now you don't? Make up your mind. So you don't support gay government marriage?

I don't want to give them special privileges over straight couples which is what you were implying.

Just kill them. Isn't that what Republicans really want to do? Call it "states rights".

Ted Cruz admits sharing platform with 'kill the gays' hate preacher Kevin Swanson was 'a mistake'

Yes, when I said I think gays and straights should be treated equally, that's what I meant, to kill them.

You're off your meds again, aren't you? Are you going to end up taking off all your clothes and having a picnic in some rich guy's yard and ending up back in the State psych ward like last time?

 

[Billy000]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

I mean sure they support certain candidates for some bizarre reason, but it doesn't take much scrutiny to realize republicans in office do not do jack shit for the middle class and poor. That's why as a party, RWs make no effort in their defense for voting for them. They know there's no justification for it. It's just easier to shit all over the democrats. In the end you have to wonder why RWs even vote at all.

You are partially correct Billy000, at least as far as this RW is concerned. I don't defend GOPers because I think they are horribly ineffective in advancing the conservative agenda. I am disgusted by the whole lot of the incumbents, from the leadership on down.

However you will have to explain to me why under Obama the wealth gap has exploded. The middle class has gotten smaller under this guy, the rich have gotten much richer. Yet it is the evil Republicans that don't care about the middle class? I am scratching my head.

Tell me, what specifically should Obama have done to close the wealth gap?

No, I won't tell you what he should have done to close the wealth gap. Not until you tell me why the wealth gap has grown under his presidency, like I asked you to in my first post.

Because there was no government intervention on the market it to keep it from widening. Now you tell me what he should have done.

"Because there was no government interventions on the market to keep it from widening". ok, if that's your answer, then I will say.....he should,have intervened to keep,it from widening. (I can't believe I am having this conversation with you, I know better.)

Ok now you have to explain how he would have done it if he tried.

 

[Billy000]

Some Of it was wasted, sure. No doubt. Most did a lot.

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

So what your saying is Obama stole Bush Jr plan and Bush tax cuts worked.....check.


Thanks for playing


.

Nope. The true source of the job growth was through extending unemployment benefits for the poor. This increased consumer demand that created jobs.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Is it because they secretly know that republicans in office are useless and do not give a shit about them but are too immature to admit it?

I mean sure they support certain candidates for some bizarre reason, but it doesn't take much scrutiny to realize republicans in office do not do jack shit for the middle class and poor. That's why as a party, RWs make no effort in their defense for voting for them. They know there's no justification for it. It's just easier to shit all over the democrats. In the end you have to wonder why RWs even vote at all.

Because we're equally disgusted with both parties.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

So what your saying is Obama stole Bush Jr plan and Bush tax cuts worked.....check.


Thanks for playing


.

Nope. The true source of the job growth was through extending unemployment benefits for the poor. This increased consumer demand that created jobs.

That's the dumbest thing I've ever read.... if true, then why not insist everybody stop working and go on unemployment?

 

[Billy000]

Some Of it was wasted, sure. No doubt. Most did a lot.

Do you have anything to back up your claim that "most did a lot"? Because I really do have 90 more examples from Senator Tom Coburn's report. That indicates to me that most (dare I say the overwhelming majority?) was horribly wasted.

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

Now you're just being a desperate hack. A "retarded Republican"? He was a U.S. Senator tracking government spending for his constituents. Ultimately you can provide a single example of where the money was spent properly but rather than just admit that you act like a 4th grader with the "retards Republican" nonsense.

Here is an actual non partisan report on the stimulus. Way better than your republican bullshit. It breaks down what was spent and the economic boost the economy.

Was the Obama Stimulus a Success or a Failure? - Non Profit News For Nonprofit Organizations | Nonprofit Quarterly

 

[Billy000]

I did earlier. It created 3 million private jobs and I can easily explain how if you'd like.

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

So what your saying is Obama stole Bush Jr plan and Bush tax cuts worked.....check.


Thanks for playing


.

Nope. The true source of the job growth was through extending unemployment benefits for the poor. This increased consumer demand that created jobs.

That's the dumbest thing I've ever read.... if true, then why not insist everybody stop working and go on unemployment?

How dumb are you? This happened during the Great Recession. Obviously it was appropriate to do it.

 

[Billy000]

There is no "right" to government marriage, the only right you have is to be left alone. You have no right to demand anything from other people. Positive rights are an oxymoron. You're just a plain moron

So...the government has no place sanctioning heterosexual marriage then?

Well....the federal government. The people of each state get to decide whether or not they want to recognize gay marriage. Sorry...it's just a fact. The U.S. Constitution says so.

Lol no the constitution makes no mention of gay marriage. Nice try though.

I guess slavery is OK to. And women can vote, why?

They are in the Constitution, gay marriage isn't. What conclusion do you draw from that? LOL, don't worry, that was a rhetorical question. I know you're an idiot

You're such a fake piece of shit. You're an embarrassment to actual libertarian.

 

[kaz]

So...the government has no place sanctioning heterosexual marriage then?

Well....the federal government. The people of each state get to decide whether or not they want to recognize gay marriage. Sorry...it's just a fact. The U.S. Constitution says so.

Lol no the constitution makes no mention of gay marriage. Nice try though.

I guess slavery is OK to. And women can vote, why?

They are in the Constitution, gay marriage isn't. What conclusion do you draw from that? LOL, don't worry, that was a rhetorical question. I know you're an idiot

You're such a fake piece of shit. You're an embarrassment to actual libertarian.

You support discrimination, I oppose it. I want government to treat all it's citizens the same. And a leftist insulting my libertarianism, wow, filed under who gives a shit?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Well that's a generic statement. I'm talking about where the money was spent. I mean, in each of the examples I gave above, it created jobs. But even you admitted it wasn't helpful. Why do we need to illegally/unconstitutionally employ someone to study ants? It's just not helpful (and even if it were, it's still illegal).

You gave a bunch of examples from retarded republican. While I agree some of the funding was wasted, much of it went to good like a tax cut for the middle class and extending unemployment benefits during the Great Recession.

So what your saying is Obama stole Bush Jr plan and Bush tax cuts worked.....check.


Thanks for playing


.

Nope. The true source of the job growth was through extending unemployment benefits for the poor. This increased consumer demand that created jobs.

That's the dumbest thing I've ever read.... if true, then why not insist everybody stop working and go on unemployment?

How dumb are you? This happened during the Great Recession. Obviously it was appropriate to do it.

Oddly, your little rant does nothing to explain why then it wouldn't be great to just have everyone on unemployment.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

You are partially correct Billy000, at least as far as this RW is concerned. I don't defend GOPers because I think they are horribly ineffective in advancing the conservative agenda. I am disgusted by the whole lot of the incumbents, from the leadership on down.

However you will have to explain to me why under Obama the wealth gap has exploded. The middle class has gotten smaller under this guy, the rich have gotten much richer. Yet it is the evil Republicans that don't care about the middle class? I am scratching my head.

Tell me, what specifically should Obama have done to close the wealth gap?

No, I won't tell you what he should have done to close the wealth gap. Not until you tell me why the wealth gap has grown under his presidency, like I asked you to in my first post.

Because there was no government intervention on the market it to keep it from widening. Now you tell me what he should have done.

"Because there was no government interventions on the market to keep it from widening". ok, if that's your answer, then I will say.....he should,have intervened to keep,it from widening. (I can't believe I am having this conversation with you, I know better.)

Ok now you have to explain how he would have done it if he tried.

He couldn't do it, he has the wrong policies and political agenda. He is a socialist at heart, and doesn't comprehend capitalism.

 

[Billy000]

Tell me, what specifically should Obama have done to close the wealth gap?

No, I won't tell you what he should have done to close the wealth gap. Not until you tell me why the wealth gap has grown under his presidency, like I asked you to in my first post.

Because there was no government intervention on the market it to keep it from widening. Now you tell me what he should have done.

"Because there was no government interventions on the market to keep it from widening". ok, if that's your answer, then I will say.....he should,have intervened to keep,it from widening. (I can't believe I am having this conversation with you, I know better.)

Ok now you have to explain how he would have done it if he tried.

He couldn't do it, he has the wrong policies and political agenda. He is a socialist at heart, and doesn't comprehend capitalism.

Ok what policies would work to fix that problem then? Be specific.

See what you assclowns aren't getting is that the wealth gap has been widening for DECADES before Obama.