Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most gun owners own up to three gunsThe gun numbers: just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms
But America’s gun super-owners, have amassed huge collections. Just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms – half of America’s total gun stock. These owners have collections that range from eight to 140 guns, the 2015 study found. Their average collection: 17 guns each.
Leftist BS. If that were true, most of my friends and family would not own any firearms.
Gun ownership in the U.S. 1972-2018 | Statistic
The three percent super gun owners own half the guns in the US
It doesn't change the fact nearly half our population owns guns. But even if they didn't.......the reason you are safe in your home and perhaps on the street is because we do have the right to arm ourselves.
We had a debate in our local blog when they were considering a CCW program in our state. An adversary asked why I wanted the law to pass? I told him for one, my mother lives alone and never drove a car in her life. She's in her early 70's and walks everywhere she goes.
To that he asked that if the law passed, would my mother walk around armed when she goes to the store? I said no she wouldn't, but the criminal doesn't now that. Now they know she's not armed.
If you want to see what a disarmed society would look like, go to a sign store and have a huge sign made that says WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOUSE and hang that on your front porch. Get back to us in a few months (if you're still alive) and let us know how that worked out for you.
That's what a disarmed society would do.
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensMore drama from gun nutsAfter reading a multitude of silly posts from rightwinger, I tried to pick out the one most stupid. This is it:
I don't wish you the obvious scenario - when a criminal holds a gun to your child's head and you take a picture - but you clearly lead a very sheltered and bigoted life. You have my sympathy, and I hope all your posting and posing is helping ease your frustrations.Thé bad guys know they will not get away with it. A camera somewhere will capture them or their vehicle. Along with DNA....There is no perfect crime anymore
The bad guys do not fear your guns.....it is the cost of doing business
The camera is a bigger deterrent than your gun
It's also interesting that you believe there are no unsolved crimes, and that criminals think rationally. Try to land on earth and face reality.
When a criminal is holding a gun to your child’s head, it is too late to start a shoot out..
You watch too many movies
And when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensMore drama from gun nutsAfter reading a multitude of silly posts from rightwinger, I tried to pick out the one most stupid. This is it:
I don't wish you the obvious scenario - when a criminal holds a gun to your child's head and you take a picture - but you clearly lead a very sheltered and bigoted life. You have my sympathy, and I hope all your posting and posing is helping ease your frustrations.
It's also interesting that you believe there are no unsolved crimes, and that criminals think rationally. Try to land on earth and face reality.
When a criminal is holding a gun to your child’s head, it is too late to start a shoot out..
You watch too many movies
And when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensMore drama from gun nutsAfter reading a multitude of silly posts from rightwinger, I tried to pick out the one most stupid. This is it:
I don't wish you the obvious scenario - when a criminal holds a gun to your child's head and you take a picture - but you clearly lead a very sheltered and bigoted life. You have my sympathy, and I hope all your posting and posing is helping ease your frustrations.
It's also interesting that you believe there are no unsolved crimes, and that criminals think rationally. Try to land on earth and face reality.
When a criminal is holding a gun to your child’s head, it is too late to start a shoot out..
You watch too many movies
And when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Most gun owners own up to three gunsThe gun numbers: just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms
But America’s gun super-owners, have amassed huge collections. Just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms – half of America’s total gun stock. These owners have collections that range from eight to 140 guns, the 2015 study found. Their average collection: 17 guns each.
Leftist BS. If that were true, most of my friends and family would not own any firearms.
Gun ownership in the U.S. 1972-2018 | Statistic
The three percent super gun owners own half the guns in the US
It doesn't change the fact nearly half our population owns guns. But even if they didn't.......the reason you are safe in your home and perhaps on the street is because we do have the right to arm ourselves.
We had a debate in our local blog when they were considering a CCW program in our state. An adversary asked why I wanted the law to pass? I told him for one, my mother lives alone and never drove a car in her life. She's in her early 70's and walks everywhere she goes.
To that he asked that if the law passed, would my mother walk around armed when she goes to the store? I said no she wouldn't, but the criminal doesn't now that. Now they know she's not armed.
If you want to see what a disarmed society would look like, go to a sign store and have a huge sign made that says WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOUSE and hang that on your front porch. Get back to us in a few months (if you're still alive) and let us know how that worked out for you.
That's what a disarmed society would do.
I will gladly hang a sign that says I have no firearms in my house as long as long as you post a sign that says you do have firearms
I have nothing in my house of value to a criminal. A few TVs, some jewelry, appliances, crappy art work
You, on the other hand, have something of value to criminals.......firearms
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensMore drama from gun nuts
When a criminal is holding a gun to your child’s head, it is too late to start a shoot out..
You watch too many movies
And when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Is the idea to allow the crime to happen and then catch the criminal, or stop the criminal act? A camera doesn't stop anything. And what do you care if the person gets caught when you're dead?
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensMore drama from gun nuts
When a criminal is holding a gun to your child’s head, it is too late to start a shoot out..
You watch too many movies
And when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Is the idea to allow the crime to happen and then catch the criminal, or stop the criminal act? A camera doesn't stop anything. And what do you care if the person gets caught when you're dead?
Criminals prefer to break in to an unoccupied home.Most gun owners own up to three gunsThe gun numbers: just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms
But America’s gun super-owners, have amassed huge collections. Just 3% of American adults own a collective 133m firearms – half of America’s total gun stock. These owners have collections that range from eight to 140 guns, the 2015 study found. Their average collection: 17 guns each.
Leftist BS. If that were true, most of my friends and family would not own any firearms.
Gun ownership in the U.S. 1972-2018 | Statistic
The three percent super gun owners own half the guns in the US
It doesn't change the fact nearly half our population owns guns. But even if they didn't.......the reason you are safe in your home and perhaps on the street is because we do have the right to arm ourselves.
We had a debate in our local blog when they were considering a CCW program in our state. An adversary asked why I wanted the law to pass? I told him for one, my mother lives alone and never drove a car in her life. She's in her early 70's and walks everywhere she goes.
To that he asked that if the law passed, would my mother walk around armed when she goes to the store? I said no she wouldn't, but the criminal doesn't now that. Now they know she's not armed.
If you want to see what a disarmed society would look like, go to a sign store and have a huge sign made that says WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOUSE and hang that on your front porch. Get back to us in a few months (if you're still alive) and let us know how that worked out for you.
That's what a disarmed society would do.
I will gladly hang a sign that says I have no firearms in my house as long as long as you post a sign that says you do have firearms
I have nothing in my house of value to a criminal. A few TVs, some jewelry, appliances, crappy art work
You, on the other hand, have something of value to criminals.......firearms
But that's the beauty of having guns in our society; nobody knows if you are armed or not. If a person is going to break into your house, they will make sure as much as they can it will be unoccupied. Because if they break in while somebody is home, it's likely going to be a death sentence.
A criminal doesn't know if you are able to protect yourself of not just like a criminal doesn't know if you have valuables in your house or not.
More criminals are captured and sentenced because of video cameras than because an armed citizen captured or shot them
Criminals prefer to break in to an unoccupied home.Most gun owners own up to three gunsLeftist BS. If that were true, most of my friends and family would not own any firearms.
Gun ownership in the U.S. 1972-2018 | Statistic
The three percent super gun owners own half the guns in the US
It doesn't change the fact nearly half our population owns guns. But even if they didn't.......the reason you are safe in your home and perhaps on the street is because we do have the right to arm ourselves.
We had a debate in our local blog when they were considering a CCW program in our state. An adversary asked why I wanted the law to pass? I told him for one, my mother lives alone and never drove a car in her life. She's in her early 70's and walks everywhere she goes.
To that he asked that if the law passed, would my mother walk around armed when she goes to the store? I said no she wouldn't, but the criminal doesn't now that. Now they know she's not armed.
If you want to see what a disarmed society would look like, go to a sign store and have a huge sign made that says WE HAVE NO FIREARMS IN THIS HOUSE and hang that on your front porch. Get back to us in a few months (if you're still alive) and let us know how that worked out for you.
That's what a disarmed society would do.
I will gladly hang a sign that says I have no firearms in my house as long as long as you post a sign that says you do have firearms
I have nothing in my house of value to a criminal. A few TVs, some jewelry, appliances, crappy art work
You, on the other hand, have something of value to criminals.......firearms
But that's the beauty of having guns in our society; nobody knows if you are armed or not. If a person is going to break into your house, they will make sure as much as they can it will be unoccupied. Because if they break in while somebody is home, it's likely going to be a death sentence.
A criminal doesn't know if you are able to protect yourself of not just like a criminal doesn't know if you have valuables in your house or not.
Makes the job easier and it is a lesser crime
You posting you have guns makes you more of a target for theft. Hard to fence the crap they steal from my house. Your guns are easy to fence
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensAnd when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Is the idea to allow the crime to happen and then catch the criminal, or stop the criminal act? A camera doesn't stop anything. And what do you care if the person gets caught when you're dead?
Criminals knowing they have little chance of getting away with the crime stops the act
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensAnd when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Is the idea to allow the crime to happen and then catch the criminal, or stop the criminal act? A camera doesn't stop anything. And what do you care if the person gets caught when you're dead?
And don't you just love the oft-repeated "Armed citizens rarely stop a crime"?
More criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensAnd when cameras eliminate the crime, guns won't be needed. But cameras won't eliminate the crime.
Cameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Is the idea to allow the crime to happen and then catch the criminal, or stop the criminal act? A camera doesn't stop anything. And what do you care if the person gets caught when you're dead?
Criminals knowing they have little chance of getting away with the crime stops the act
Armed citizens sleepMore criminals are captured and sentenced because of video cameras than because an armed citizen captured or shot them
Most video cameras are in one place 24/7. Armed citizens are not.
Armed citizens sleepMore criminals are captured and sentenced because of video cameras than because an armed citizen captured or shot them
Most video cameras are in one place 24/7. Armed citizens are not.
Cameras dont
I think you better off living ina country where women are not assaulted as much. Cause 1 in 4 women or so get sexually harassed. Even the highest office is occupied by a pussy grabber and the highest court is occupied by a rapist.You are numb to violence....kids get slaughtered and it is just another day for ya. I understand that's the Norma you grow up in.With your guns you still have more rapes and more crimes and most importantly more deaths. Why?Maybe you can't follow the conversation. You said in other countries they have less crime than the US. While we may have more murders and deaths, these countries have other crime that's beyond ours because the people can't protect themselves against the bad guys. Europe has a lot of problems with criminals using knives to rob and assault people, and they have a considerable amount of rapes as well. Here, a female can use a gun just as effectively as a male, however she would be at a great disadvantage getting into knife fight with some guy.
It's not the object that does the killing, it's the person using the object. That's what you on the left just can't seem to comprehend. If somebody wants to kill you, they will kill you with any object that works for them I don't care what country you're from.
More than what? Some country you've arbitrarily chosen to compare us to, which has very little in common with our own? Or more than our own country would have if law-abiding citizens were unarmed and defenseless?
Guess which one of those comparisons actually matters to us.
Am I? You actually feel good about sitting there and asserting that about a person you don't know?
I've been a victim of a violent crime. How about YOU? Tell me about the criminal who assaulted YOU on a dark street, about testifying at his trial with him sitting there six feet away from you. Tell me about how YOU felt when the papers reported that the man who assaulted you was being tried for murder. Tell me what it was like when YOU watched him executed.
ONE of us is numb to violence, you pusillanimous bucket of snake vomit, but it isn't me. You can preach to me about your "moral superiority" in airily deciding that women like me are safer without guns right after Hell freezes over.
I live in this country and American women like me are safer when we're armed. I don't give a flying fuck what your tinpot country decides to do, and I sure as shit don't need your advice on what this one should do.
I saw a story on the news onceMore criminals are caught because of cameras than armed citizensCameras deter crime and catch criminals. When criminals find few of their associates getting away with it, they find other adventures.
Most crimes today have videos on the news within hours.
Armed citizens rarely stop a crime.
That's a pipe dream. No nation has ever successfully prevented violent crime, so there will always be a need for defense. And your last point has been refuted many times.
Is the idea to allow the crime to happen and then catch the criminal, or stop the criminal act? A camera doesn't stop anything. And what do you care if the person gets caught when you're dead?
Criminals knowing they have little chance of getting away with the crime stops the act
Oh please. Anybody can put on a hoodie or face hat. You can take out the lens of a camera with a simple high powered BB gun. Sure, cameras help, but cameras don't stop the crime. That's why we have footage all the time of people getting assaulted or shot. They know the cameras are there, but simply don't care.
Blame also those who screwed the blacks from slavery, segregation to what we see now.Guns makes it easy to commit a tragedy...is proven by statistics that those that own guns are more likely to die from them.Those females or males will shoot their partners while asleep when they catch them cheating, some of those guys will shoot their boss when he fires them....that's why the US has 30000 deaths per year.....instead of fists people use guns.I think you live in fantasy world.
A few years ago a friend of mine called me to go shooting at the range. I haven't been to the range in many years, so I accepted.
Several years earlier the range was a different place. They have about a dozen booths, and perhaps four or five were being occupied on any given part of the day. The females would sit out in the store behind the window either having a BS conversation with other wives and girlfriends, or reading a book as their men had fun.
When I went back, the place was standing room only. It took us nearly two hours to get a booth. Behind the glass on the range were the guys, but just as many gals as well. Just like couples who go out to dinner together or perhaps bowling, the couples now are enjoying putting holes in targets.
If that's not surprising enough, the range we normally go to was the only one in town. Now several more opened up and from what I understand, they too are packed every minute they're open.
So your hope is the exact opposite. More and more Americans are enjoying firearms than ever before, and it's catching like wildfire.
Right, because if somebody wants to kill their spouse or employer, the only way to do that is with a gun. Otherwise they will just punch them.
I have no idea where this leftist mentality came from that an inanimate object has the ability to control a human being. Can a fire hydrant make you piss on it like a dog? Does an electrical outlet make you want to stick your tongue in it?
I guess the reason it's so confusing to normal people is because I've never once had an object control my fate yet alone the rest of my natural life. For some reason, you on the left have this belief. But then again, you think man controls the climate as well, and not God.
23 years in a gun free country: 0 mass shootings, 0 deaths at schools, unheared of killings in work places like here.
Robberies are committed by bats or knives, worse case scenario if you donr hand the robbers the money you will end up with stitches, if they had guns you can say goodbye to the world.
Again you are numb to gun violence, you grew up in this environment you didnt live in a less violent environment.
I lived and grew up in very non-violent areas. Then the blacks moved in and everything changed. So what do you want me to do about that? Thank your Democrat politicians and HUD for it.
I lived in a big city , and we had some super rough neighborhoods, drugs and all....people get stabbed but hardly ever get killed...now if they had access to guns we would be just like any other US city.
