Why does the left believe a corporate tax break "steals" money from the taxpayers?

[Toddsterpatriot]

So lower taxes on a corporation allows them to buy more capital equipment and materials, to give more raises to existing employees, to hire more employees, to keep from outsourcing to foreign countries, and to keep the price of their product affordable.

That's a win-win situation.

BULLSHIT. Tax saving for corporations ALWAYS go in the pocket of corporations.

Where is that corporation pocket located?

See the 1%.

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

 

[OnePercenter]

BULLSHIT. Tax saving for corporations ALWAYS go in the pocket of corporations.

Where is that corporation pocket located?

See the 1%.

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Where is that corporation pocket located?

See the 1%.

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

 

[Brain357]

See the 1%.

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

 

[OnePercenter]

See the 1%.

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure it would, but how would you get employers past the market price of fish?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

Booting illegal aliens won't raise the wages of workers? Why not?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Census Bureau says that 41.5% of American households brought in between $35,000 and $100,000 in 2015.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

Excellent!!

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure it would, but how would you get employers past the market price of fish?

Sure it would

Has your account been hacked?
I worry when you get something right.

 

[Brain357]

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income. According to the Tax Policy Center, they earned 17 percent of expanded cash income in 2014. (Some studies have given higher estimates for this group's share of income depending on their different definitions of income.)

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

Booting illegal aliens won't raise the wages of workers? Why not?

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock. There will be no noticeable change in wages. Immigrants are just the new scapegoat. It used to be Unions, now that they are gone it is immigrants. Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were and how good it would be without them? Where is that prosperity? The rich get richer, inequality grows, and the economy slows. We need a strong middle class again, not more inequality.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

While the top 1 percent pay a larger share of taxes, they also earn an outsized share of income.

Yes, that's why they pay more.

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

Booting illegal aliens won't raise the wages of workers? Why not?

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock. There will be no noticeable change in wages. Immigrants are just the new scapegoat. It used to be Unions, now that they are gone it is immigrants. Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were and how good it would be without them? Where is that prosperity? The rich get richer, inequality grows, and the economy slows. We need a strong middle class again, not more inequality.

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock.

Nope, I'm trying to raise the wages of Americans.

Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were

Yes, unions suck. Big time.

and how good it would be without them?

Yes, now if we could only outlaw public worker unions......

 

[Brain357]

Sounds like the American worker needs a pay raise.

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

Booting illegal aliens won't raise the wages of workers? Why not?

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock. There will be no noticeable change in wages. Immigrants are just the new scapegoat. It used to be Unions, now that they are gone it is immigrants. Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were and how good it would be without them? Where is that prosperity? The rich get richer, inequality grows, and the economy slows. We need a strong middle class again, not more inequality.

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock.

Nope, I'm trying to raise the wages of Americans.

Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were

Yes, unions suck. Big time.

and how good it would be without them?

Yes, now if we could only outlaw public worker unions......

Well there is no money with the immigrants to raise wages. They make about nothing.

So there is no prosperity with the Unions pretty much gone. Go figure. And wages are stagnant...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

Booting illegal aliens won't raise the wages of workers? Why not?

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock. There will be no noticeable change in wages. Immigrants are just the new scapegoat. It used to be Unions, now that they are gone it is immigrants. Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were and how good it would be without them? Where is that prosperity? The rich get richer, inequality grows, and the economy slows. We need a strong middle class again, not more inequality.

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock.

Nope, I'm trying to raise the wages of Americans.

Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were

Yes, unions suck. Big time.

and how good it would be without them?

Yes, now if we could only outlaw public worker unions......

Well there is no money with the immigrants to raise wages. They make about nothing.

So there is no prosperity with the Unions pretty much gone. Go figure. And wages are stagnant...

Well there is no money with the immigrants to raise wages.

No money with the immigrants? Can you translate that into English?

They make about nothing.

It's true, they drag down the wages of Americans they compete with.

So there is no prosperity with the Unions pretty much gone.

Americans are making more than ever.

 

[thereisnospoon]

End the drug war, right wingers. don't be socialists on a national basis; y'all have a majority in Congress, now.

Non sequitur...Dismissed

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

/----/ Libtards have a second issue as well. They can't grasp the notion that corporations treat taxes as overhead that gets passed on to the consumer. In effect, corporate taxes are taxes on the consumer.

So lower taxes on a corporation allows them to buy more capital equipment and materials, to give more raises to existing employees, to hire more employees, to keep from outsourcing to foreign countries, and to keep the price of their product affordable.

That's a win-win situation.

No..it isn't. Businesses are run by evil capitalists and must be destroyed,.
Power to the people!

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

Every dollar a corporation doesn't pay in taxes has to be paid by someone else,

all else being equal.

The zero sum game.
It does not exist.
Every dollar paid by a business, gets passed along to the end user.
Every dollar not recovered by a business is removed from the bottom line. Meaning. one less dollar to add to the labor budget. One less dollar to the equipment budget, etc.
Taxation removes money from the economy.

 

[thereisnospoon]

If you boot a couple million of their illegal alien competitors, they'll get one.
You know, supply and demand.....well, you don't know, but most other people do.

Sure, just like getting rid of Unions was going to be great for workers...

Booting illegal aliens won't raise the wages of workers? Why not?

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock. There will be no noticeable change in wages. Immigrants are just the new scapegoat. It used to be Unions, now that they are gone it is immigrants. Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were and how good it would be without them? Where is that prosperity? The rich get richer, inequality grows, and the economy slows. We need a strong middle class again, not more inequality.

You are booting the people who make the very least, trying to get water from a rock.

Nope, I'm trying to raise the wages of Americans.

Remember when Republicans talked about how bad Unions were

Yes, unions suck. Big time.

and how good it would be without them?

Yes, now if we could only outlaw public worker unions......

Well there is no money with the immigrants to raise wages. They make about nothing.

So there is no prosperity with the Unions pretty much gone. Go figure. And wages are stagnant...

Would it be possible for you to translate that into English?

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

Every dollar a corporation doesn't pay in taxes has to be paid by someone else,

all else being equal.

Notice how the dipshit, talks about taxes in, but never reduction of the FAILED government agencies? I just showed a video of illegal anchors scamming billions from US tax payers ( #5 ), but hey, those evil corps need to pay more. Why? So those future illegal Democrat voters will vote Democrat. Just cant get more stupid than a liberal.

The topic is taxes, retard.

And the issue of taxes was addressed by the OP.....Shut up. You know nothing

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

Every dollar a corporation doesn't pay in taxes has to be paid by someone else,

all else being equal.

/----/ Not true. Letting people keep more of their hard earned money costs nothing.

We have 20 trillion in debt proving that is wrong.

Obama's debt

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

Every dollar a corporation doesn't pay in taxes has to be paid by someone else,

all else being equal.

/----/ Not true. Letting people keep more of their hard earned money costs nothing.

We have 20 trillion in debt proving that is wrong.

Half of that being Obama's doing. If you remember the national debt was only something like $9 Trillion when GW left office.

And where did that $10 Trillion dollars Obama ran up go to?

Obama had little to do with it.

There is no discussing serious issues with an irrational person

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

Every dollar a corporation doesn't pay in taxes has to be paid by someone else,

all else being equal.

I've never heard of a case where the government increased the taxpayer's tax rate, because some corporation got a tax break.

Please point that out to me if you can.

You can't be this retarded, can you?

Maybe you'd like to answer the question then:

Show me a single instance where the government increased the taxpayer's tax rate, because some corporation got a tax break.

And that answers my question.

It must be free computer access day at the group home today.

You did not provide that which was asked of you. Why not?

 

[thereisnospoon]

How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?

Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.

That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.

/----/ Libtards have a second issue as well. They can't grasp the notion that corporations treat taxes as overhead that gets passed on to the consumer. In effect, corporate taxes are taxes on the consumer.

So lower taxes on a corporation allows them to buy more capital equipment and materials, to give more raises to existing employees, to hire more employees, to keep from outsourcing to foreign countries, and to keep the price of their product affordable.

That's a win-win situation.

Don't complain about the Debt, right wingers.

Wait a minute WHAT?.......
Ya...ok. Obama didn't do nuthin....No wonder why your party is imploding. No wonder why your ideology is rejected by so many