danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
Lowering taxes during alleged times of war; should be considered a "high crime and misdemeanor".To pay for Shrub's two wars of choice (off the books), unfunded Medicare drug benefit, and bankster bailout?/----/ Not true. Letting people keep more of their hard earned money costs nothing.How many times have you heard "Corporate tax breaks are being subsidized by the tax-paying public" or "The tax payers are having to foot the bill for a private company"?
Those are ignorant statements. A tax break given to a corporation isn't existing money the government has already collected from taxpayers, it's some of the money those corporations have earned on their own. Money which they don't have to pay to the government. They earned it, and they own it.
That would be equivalent to saying that the general public has some right to a corporation's earnings which anyone can tell you, is socialism.
Every dollar a corporation doesn't pay in taxes has to be paid by someone else,
all else being equal.
We have 20 trillion in debt proving that is wrong.
Half of that being Obama's doing. If you remember the national debt was only something like $9 Trillion when GW left office.
And where did that $10 Trillion dollars Obama ran up go to?
In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against the nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.