Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Carbon dating is based off of a faulty scientific premise. it has been used to disprove itself on more than one occasion. the Christian bible also is not opposed to pre adamic animal life. scratch the Dino argument and carry on.
Radiocarbon dating has nothing to do with dinosaurs and their lack of mention in the literary collection of writings known as the Bible. The reason they are not mention is because the men who wrote the various books of the bible simply had no knowledge of the vast history of life on this planet.
You do realize that 95% or better of animal life found on this planet was not mentioned in the Bible, not just the dinosaurs. I always find it amusing when atheists try to drag out the dinosaurs as some kind of 'gotchya' when discussing the Bible. Clearly shows their lack of logical thinking and their desperation.
I don't have any religion; what religion do you think I have? I think you might worship at the altar of the Strawman...
CMM:
An argument can be made that the health and welfare of all citizens is good for each individual...
That's your religion, and you're willing to force that belief via government control on those in society that don't agree with you. Using that little comment, there's nothing that you can't force on the individual for 'their own good'. Far more dangerous than any religion I know of.
You are living in a constitutional republic with mostly democratic practices, so guess what, bright eyes? You are in the minority of that election cycle. Your problem, no one else.
No! My thanks for educating me, I had no idea!! A constitutional republic?? Really?
This should be good... what minority is that Jake?
You are sounding stupidly again, nothing new.
ACA is the legitimate law of the land. You don't like it? Who cares.
WTF are you talking about Jakey? Who said anything about the ACA, are you losing it?
Carbon dating is based off of a faulty scientific premise. it has been used to disprove itself on more than one occasion. the Christian bible also is not opposed to pre adamic animal life. scratch the Dino argument and carry on.
Radiocarbon dating has nothing to do with dinosaurs and their lack of mention in the literary collection of writings known as the Bible. The reason they are not mention is because the men who wrote the various books of the bible simply had no knowledge of the vast history of life on this planet.
You do realize that 95% or better of animal life found on this planet was not mentioned in the Bible, not just the dinosaurs. I always find it amusing when atheists try to drag out the dinosaurs as some kind of 'gotchya' when discussing the Bible. Clearly shows their lack of logical thinking and their desperation.
Why do you think I mentioned the several major extinction events not mentioned by the men who wrote that book? Carbon 14 dating is only accurate till about 14 thousand years ago. It is useless when tying to establish dates for when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.
CMM:
An argument can be made that the health and welfare of all citizens is good for each individual...
That's your religion, and you're willing to force that belief via government control on those in society that don't agree with you. Using that little comment, there's nothing that you can't force on the individual for 'their own good'. Far more dangerous than any religion I know of.
You are living in a constitutional republic with mostly democratic practices, so guess what, bright eyes? You are in the minority of that election cycle. Your problem, no one else.
No! My thanks for educating me, I had no idea!! A constitutional republic?? Really?
This should be good... what minority is that Jake?
You are sounding stupidly again, nothing new.
ACA is the legitimate law of the land. You don't like it? Who cares.
WTF are you talking about Jakey? Who said anything about the ACA, are you losing it?
i am responding to your attack on the bolded above. Get over it.
Blinds argument is predicated upon a theory that the earth is believed to be 6000 years old. very few Christians hold to that theory seeing as the creation story in genesis reveals the water being parted and the land already existing. also the Hebrew language used when God promised not to flood the earth again alludes to the earth being flooded more than once which could have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs. that argument aside it is foolish to assume that carbon dating which dates rock formations as older than the trees they are on top of is some kind of valid means of dating.
that being said Christianity is hated for the same reason that all governments and religions are hated, rules go against wants. in a society that upholds freedom and democracy the odds are in favor of the public freely choosing societal suicide by the removal of moral laws and social norms. both of which are subject to interpretation for the short term and more favorably interpreted with foreknowledge evaluating historical trends and future possibilities. Christianity hinders the want and in a society that rewards the wanters Christianity will be put to the wayside.
Blinds argument is predicated upon a theory that the earth is believed to be 6000 years old. very few Christians hold to that theory seeing as the creation story in genesis reveals the water being parted and the land already existing. also the Hebrew language used when God promised not to flood the earth again alludes to the earth being flooded more than once which could have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs. that argument aside it is foolish to assume that carbon dating which dates rock formations as older than the trees they are on top of is some kind of valid means of dating.
that being said Christianity is hated for the same reason that all governments and religions are hated, rules go against wants. in a society that upholds freedom and democracy the odds are in favor of the public freely choosing societal suicide by the removal of moral laws and social norms. both of which are subject to interpretation for the short term and more favorably interpreted with foreknowledge evaluating historical trends and future possibilities. Christianity hinders the want and in a society that rewards the wanters Christianity will be put to the wayside.
Radiocarbon dating only dates the remains of living creatures, not rocks. Furthermore, my mentioning of the various authors of the books of the Bible ignoring the fossil record is because they were ignorant of the fossil record when they wrote the books. It really had nothing to do with the silly notion that the Earth is mere 6000 years old.
Don't mix Christ up with "let him die" and "feed the poor and they will breed". Republican's religion and the true Christian religion have nothing in common.Before Christ there was Rome with its absence of family, whore houses on every corner, and blood sport Coliseum. After Christ there was the 10 commandments and the marital vow to love, honor, obey, and cherish your family.
Indeed, Christ created civilization on earth and is still the source of civilization but sadly a liberal will lack the IQ to understand and so fear Christianity more than Islam even when Islam has vowed to cut our heads off while we are still alive.
The dark ages would more accurately be called the Age of Christianity. It was the time when the Christian church, at that time the Catholic church, was all powerful It's the time when "witches" were burned at the stake. Cats were slaughtered, thinking they had something to do with Satan, which led to an over-population of mice and rats, which led to the plague. The ancient greeks knew the earth was round, the Christians didn't because it wasn't in the bible.[QUOTE="EdwardBaiamonte, post: 10133084, member: 34008"... Christ created civilization on earth and is still the source of civilization ...
Blinds argument is predicated upon a theory that the earth is believed to be 6000 years old. very few Christians hold to that theory seeing as the creation story in genesis reveals the water being parted and the land already existing. also the Hebrew language used when God promised not to flood the earth again alludes to the earth being flooded more than once which could have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs. that argument aside it is foolish to assume that carbon dating which dates rock formations as older than the trees they are on top of is some kind of valid means of dating.
that being said Christianity is hated for the same reason that all governments and religions are hated, rules go against wants. in a society that upholds freedom and democracy the odds are in favor of the public freely choosing societal suicide by the removal of moral laws and social norms. both of which are subject to interpretation for the short term and more favorably interpreted with foreknowledge evaluating historical trends and future possibilities. Christianity hinders the want and in a society that rewards the wanters Christianity will be put to the wayside.
Radiocarbon dating only dates the remains of living creatures, not rocks. Furthermore, my mentioning of the various authors of the books of the Bible ignoring the fossil record is because they were ignorant of the fossil record when they wrote the books. It really had nothing to do with the silly notion that the Earth is mere 6000 years old.
The only people that I've seen with the 'silly notion' that the Earth is only 6,000 years old are atheists such as yourself.
Carbon dating is based off of a faulty scientific premise. it has been used to disprove itself on more than one occasion. the Christian bible also is not opposed to pre adamic animal life. scratch the Dino argument and carry on.
Radiocarbon dating has nothing to do with dinosaurs and their lack of mention in the literary collection of writings known as the Bible. The reason they are not mention is because the men who wrote the various books of the bible simply had no knowledge of the vast history of life on this planet.
You do realize that 95% or better of animal life found on this planet was not mentioned in the Bible, not just the dinosaurs. I always find it amusing when atheists try to drag out the dinosaurs as some kind of 'gotchya' when discussing the Bible. Clearly shows their lack of logical thinking and their desperation.
Why do you think I mentioned the several major extinction events not mentioned by the men who wrote that book? Carbon 14 dating is only accurate till about 14 thousand years ago. It is useless when tying to establish dates for when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.
But that's not what I was referring to either. Most animals in existence at that time are not mentioned in the Bible, so why would you expect them to all be mentioned? Your comments make no sense.
Fickleness?Carbon dating is based off of a faulty scientific premise. it has been used to disprove itself on more than one occasion. the Christian bible also is not opposed to pre adamic animal life. scratch the Dino argument and carry on.
Radiocarbon dating has nothing to do with dinosaurs and their lack of mention in the literary collection of writings known as the Bible. The reason they are not mention is because the men who wrote the various books of the bible simply had no knowledge of the vast history of life on this planet.
You do realize that 95% or better of animal life found on this planet was not mentioned in the Bible, not just the dinosaurs. I always find it amusing when atheists try to drag out the dinosaurs as some kind of 'gotchya' when discussing the Bible. Clearly shows their lack of logical thinking and their desperation.
Why do you think I mentioned the several major extinction events not mentioned by the men who wrote that book? Carbon 14 dating is only accurate till about 14 thousand years ago. It is useless when tying to establish dates for when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.
But that's not what I was referring to either. Most animals in existence at that time are not mentioned in the Bible, so why would you expect them to all be mentioned? Your comments make no sense.
I'll take that as you do not know why God doesn't explain why it allowed the dinosaurs to live on Earth for millions of years and then it killed them off?
Blinds argument is predicated upon a theory that the earth is believed to be 6000 years old. very few Christians hold to that theory seeing as the creation story in genesis reveals the water being parted and the land already existing. also the Hebrew language used when God promised not to flood the earth again alludes to the earth being flooded more than once which could have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs. that argument aside it is foolish to assume that carbon dating which dates rock formations as older than the trees they are on top of is some kind of valid means of dating.
that being said Christianity is hated for the same reason that all governments and religions are hated, rules go against wants. in a society that upholds freedom and democracy the odds are in favor of the public freely choosing societal suicide by the removal of moral laws and social norms. both of which are subject to interpretation for the short term and more favorably interpreted with foreknowledge evaluating historical trends and future possibilities. Christianity hinders the want and in a society that rewards the wanters Christianity will be put to the wayside.
Radiocarbon dating only dates the remains of living creatures, not rocks. Furthermore, my mentioning of the various authors of the books of the Bible ignoring the fossil record is because they were ignorant of the fossil record when they wrote the books. It really had nothing to do with the silly notion that the Earth is mere 6000 years old.
The only people that I've seen with the 'silly notion' that the Earth is only 6,000 years old are atheists such as yourself.
Blinds argument is predicated upon a theory that the earth is believed to be 6000 years old. very few Christians hold to that theory seeing as the creation story in genesis reveals the water being parted and the land already existing. also the Hebrew language used when God promised not to flood the earth again alludes to the earth being flooded more than once which could have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs. that argument aside it is foolish to assume that carbon dating which dates rock formations as older than the trees they are on top of is some kind of valid means of dating.
that being said Christianity is hated for the same reason that all governments and religions are hated, rules go against wants. in a society that upholds freedom and democracy the odds are in favor of the public freely choosing societal suicide by the removal of moral laws and social norms. both of which are subject to interpretation for the short term and more favorably interpreted with foreknowledge evaluating historical trends and future possibilities. Christianity hinders the want and in a society that rewards the wanters Christianity will be put to the wayside.
Radiocarbon dating only dates the remains of living creatures, not rocks. Furthermore, my mentioning of the various authors of the books of the Bible ignoring the fossil record is because they were ignorant of the fossil record when they wrote the books. It really had nothing to do with the silly notion that the Earth is mere 6000 years old.
The only people that I've seen with the 'silly notion' that the Earth is only 6,000 years old are atheists such as yourself.
Gallup Poll 58 of Republicans Are Young Earth Creationists - Little Green Footballs
fool
Carbon dating is based off of a faulty scientific premise. it has been used to disprove itself on more than one occasion. the Christian bible also is not opposed to pre adamic animal life. scratch the Dino argument and carry on.
Radiocarbon dating has nothing to do with dinosaurs and their lack of mention in the literary collection of writings known as the Bible. The reason they are not mention is because the men who wrote the various books of the bible simply had no knowledge of the vast history of life on this planet.
You do realize that 95% or better of animal life found on this planet was not mentioned in the Bible, not just the dinosaurs. I always find it amusing when atheists try to drag out the dinosaurs as some kind of 'gotchya' when discussing the Bible. Clearly shows their lack of logical thinking and their desperation.
Why do you think I mentioned the several major extinction events not mentioned by the men who wrote that book? Carbon 14 dating is only accurate till about 14 thousand years ago. It is useless when tying to establish dates for when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.
But that's not what I was referring to either. Most animals in existence at that time are not mentioned in the Bible, so why would you expect them to all be mentioned? Your comments make no sense.
I'll take that as you do not know why God doesn't explain why it allowed the dinosaurs to live on Earth for millions of years and then it killed them off?
Blinds argument is predicated upon a theory that the earth is believed to be 6000 years old. very few Christians hold to that theory seeing as the creation story in genesis reveals the water being parted and the land already existing. also the Hebrew language used when God promised not to flood the earth again alludes to the earth being flooded more than once which could have accounted for the extinction of the dinosaurs. that argument aside it is foolish to assume that carbon dating which dates rock formations as older than the trees they are on top of is some kind of valid means of dating.
that being said Christianity is hated for the same reason that all governments and religions are hated, rules go against wants. in a society that upholds freedom and democracy the odds are in favor of the public freely choosing societal suicide by the removal of moral laws and social norms. both of which are subject to interpretation for the short term and more favorably interpreted with foreknowledge evaluating historical trends and future possibilities. Christianity hinders the want and in a society that rewards the wanters Christianity will be put to the wayside.
Radiocarbon dating only dates the remains of living creatures, not rocks. Furthermore, my mentioning of the various authors of the books of the Bible ignoring the fossil record is because they were ignorant of the fossil record when they wrote the books. It really had nothing to do with the silly notion that the Earth is mere 6000 years old.
The only people that I've seen with the 'silly notion' that the Earth is only 6,000 years old are atheists such as yourself.
Sure Newby, except you're the one who mention it here.
