Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm with youI'm on the left and I don't want the civil war monuments and flags removed...I want them moved.
Put them all in a museum in the poorest of the former slave states. That state will get revenue and we will have a place to go like the Holocaust Museum.
Why do the progressives have an issue with historical memorials?
*****SMILE*****
I'm with youI'm on the left and I don't want the civil war monuments and flags removed...I want them moved.
Put them all in a museum in the poorest of the former slave states. That state will get revenue and we will have a place to go like the Holocaust Museum.
Why are those monuments in the most prominanat point in every southern city?
In over 200 years of history, why was their proudest moment when they seceded from the U.S. in order to maintain slavery?
Say OP, I see you've congratulated yourself on a job well done. Add some merit to your opinion, and explain why it doesn't apply to the following POUS. According to your narrative, we should probably start with George Washington. As a matter of fact, Washington DC best change their name, because it's named for a guy who participated in slavery.
Per liberal narrative the following must be demolished. http://www.onecolumbiasc.com/wp-con...c.com/images/public_art/4906/12.2-300x400.jpg
List of Presidents of the United States who owned slaves - Wikipedia
You're going to have to remove all monuments for Ulysses S. Grant as well. He owned slaves. That's irony.
You'll find that g compliments himself regularly. He truly thinks he is the smartest kid in the sand box.
Exactly G to a "T"
.
Why do the progressives have an issue with historical memorials?
*****SMILE*****
Progressive and Americans don't have a problem with anything memorializes great men/women in American history.
Traitors and those who fought to preserve slavery are not heroes or "great" Americans. Not worthy of a statue in public. They can be in a museum, behind glass, where we can remember them as examples of Americas ugliest and shameful days.
Are there Memorials to Hitler all around Germany?
[Q
Look at you, redefining slavery, snowflake.
You are confused Moon Bat.
Taking the fruits of my labor by government force and giving it to away to somebody that didn't earn it is pretty much the historical definition of slavery. However, if calling your filthy ass welfare state a slave state offends you so much then you can even call it thievery if you want.
I think that would be a fitting monumentStart with the New York Triangle fire.I'm all for tearing down the heroic statues of those Democrats and replacing them with sites which educate Americans about the atrocities the Democrats committed.Those racist Democrats were fighting for slavery. And after those loser Democrats got their asses kicked by America, they started the KKK. This very important knowledge is regularly passed onto us by the pseudocons of this forum ad infinitum!I wouldnt be opposed to a plaque giving that sort of historical context at all, though It was up to the Union government at the time to label those generals as traitors. They were fighting for the wrong cause but they were fighting in uniform for their own confederate government. If anything I think the statues make a good reminder of how we were once divided. I'm not pro Confederate at all by the way, I've lived in California my entire life, I would just like to be fair about this, is all. I do also know that the ACLU will defend an artists right to put up paintings or sculptures mocking God or Christ even though it may offend millions of Christians and they protest it. That may be a double standard there.
So why is the Right standing up for a statue of one of those bad racist Democrat Christian terrorists? It makes no sense!
Why are you so insistent upon erasing what those democrats did?
You know, like Auschwitz instead of Hitler statues.
Wherever there is a Democrat statue, replace it with an atrocity memorial.
Have a memorial to the children who died in the northern mills and sweatshops. There you go, good old yankee atrocities.
But why would we erect a monument to those who trapped those women in the building?
Who cares?I'm with youI'm on the left and I don't want the civil war monuments and flags removed...I want them moved.
Put them all in a museum in the poorest of the former slave states. That state will get revenue and we will have a place to go like the Holocaust Museum.
Why are those monuments in the most prominanat point in every southern city?
In over 200 years of history, why was their proudest moment when they seceded from the U.S. in order to maintain slavery?
At least the South don't have a monument to an imaginary character like the North has..you do know Rocky Balboa was not a real person right?
View attachment 143507
.
I think that would be a fitting monumentStart with the New York Triangle fire.I'm all for tearing down the heroic statues of those Democrats and replacing them with sites which educate Americans about the atrocities the Democrats committed.Those racist Democrats were fighting for slavery. And after those loser Democrats got their asses kicked by America, they started the KKK. This very important knowledge is regularly passed onto us by the pseudocons of this forum ad infinitum!
So why is the Right standing up for a statue of one of those bad racist Democrat Christian terrorists? It makes no sense!
Why are you so insistent upon erasing what those democrats did?
You know, like Auschwitz instead of Hitler statues.
Wherever there is a Democrat statue, replace it with an atrocity memorial.
Have a memorial to the children who died in the northern mills and sweatshops. There you go, good old yankee atrocities.
But why would we erect a monument to those who trapped those women in the building?
It's an atrocity memorial for the north. What were the atrocities of the south? Django Unchained doesn't count.
I mean, at least twice a month, the pseudocons on this forum start topics to tell us that Confederates were racist Democrats and bad, bad, bad people.
So why is the Right defending those statues of evil Democrats? Hmmmm? Why were they sending out of state protesters to Virginia? Hmmmm?
Oftentimes, two pseudocons will start the same kind of topic on the same day. It's almost as if someone is telling all the tards this shit on a Tard Network.
So why is the Right defending a Democrat statue? Why?
Progressives being the second most intolerant people on the planet... factI mean, at least twice a month, the pseudocons on this forum start topics to tell us that Confederates were racist Democrats and bad, bad, bad people.
So why is the Right defending those statues of evil Democrats? Hmmmm? Why were they sending out of state protesters to Virginia? Hmmmm?
Oftentimes, two pseudocons will start the same kind of topic on the same day. It's almost as if someone is telling all the tards this shit on a Tard Network.
So why is the Right defending a Democrat statue? Why?
Because it is history is why I don't want them removed. History removed from view is history that will be repeated again. Why is it that progressives ALWAYS want to hide history?
Progressives being the second most intolerant people on the planet... factI mean, at least twice a month, the pseudocons on this forum start topics to tell us that Confederates were racist Democrats and bad, bad, bad people.
So why is the Right defending those statues of evil Democrats? Hmmmm? Why were they sending out of state protesters to Virginia? Hmmmm?
Oftentimes, two pseudocons will start the same kind of topic on the same day. It's almost as if someone is telling all the tards this shit on a Tard Network.
So why is the Right defending a Democrat statue? Why?
Because it is history is why I don't want them removed. History removed from view is history that will be repeated again. Why is it that progressives ALWAYS want to hide history?
Democrats want these various statues and monuments taken down, because they stand as an embarrassing reminder that the Democratic Party—in spite of all its efforts to falsely smear its opposition with this charge—is now, has always been, and will always be the party of overt racism and bigotry.
[Q
Look at you, redefining slavery, snowflake.
You are confused Moon Bat.
Taking the fruits of my labor by government force and giving it to away to somebody that didn't earn it is pretty much the historical definition of slavery. However, if calling your filthy ass welfare state a slave state offends you so much then you can even call it thievery if you want.
Yeah, that's not the historical definition of slavery. You're an idiot. But, hey, if you want to live your life as a victim controlled by 'welfare queens' with their 'obama phones' then be my guest.
[Q
Look at you, redefining slavery, snowflake.
You are confused Moon Bat.
Taking the fruits of my labor by government force and giving it to away to somebody that didn't earn it is pretty much the historical definition of slavery. However, if calling your filthy ass welfare state a slave state offends you so much then you can even call it thievery if you want.
Yeah, that's not the historical definition of slavery. You're an idiot. But, hey, if you want to live your life as a victim controlled by 'welfare queens' with their 'obama phones' then be my guest.
We are all fucking victims of a combined government that robs us of 40% of the GDP for the cost of government.
That robs us of our income, wealth and potential. Being $20 trillion in debt at the Federal level and almost that much again on the State and local level robs our children of their future. It takes money out of the productive economy and puts it in the hands of sorry ass bureaucrats, whose bosses are corrupt politicians elected by special interest groups.
This enormous bloated Federal government has cost us in the last eight years with increased poverty, decreased family income, greater income disparity, tremendous debt and dismal economic growth.
You may like the idea of the filthy ass government taking your money by force and giving it to the welfare queens, illegals and Muslim refugees along with Solyndras, Planned Parenthood and GM but not all Americans are fat, supid and dumb like you.
Democrats want these various statues and monuments taken down, because they stand as an embarrassing reminder that the Democratic Party—in spite of all its efforts to falsely smear its opposition with this charge—is now, has always been, and will always be the party of overt racism and bigotry.
What is embarrassing is the Republicans embracing slavery
We are all f•••ing victims of a combined government that robs us of 40% of the GDP for the cost of government.
That robs us of our income, wealth and potential. Being $20 trillion in debt at the Federal level and almost that much again on the State and local level robs our children of their future. It takes money out of the productive economy and puts it in the hands of sorry ass bureaucrats, whose bosses are corrupt politicians elected by special interest groups.
This enormous bloated Federal government has cost us in the last eight years with increased poverty, decreased family income, greater income disparity, tremendous debt and dismal economic growth.
You may like the idea of the filthy ass government taking your money by force and giving it to the welfare queens, illegals and Muslim refugees along with Solyndras, Planned Parenthood and GM but not all Americans are fat, supid [sic] and dumb like you.
