JoeB131
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 171,463
- 32,785
Yes, these women have no rights because they are brown skinned and born into the wrong culture.
Have you ever considered supporting liberalism instead of its antithesis?
Never said I was a liberal, buddy.
I'm a pragmatist.
Pragmatically, we aren't going to change their culture, which predates our by a thousand years or so. Nor is it really our place to, no matter how many pictures of self-hating Muslims Mac puts up.
You see, ironically, the Shah of Iran tried to outlaw the Chador (the Iranian version of the Hijab), and it was one of the motivating factors for the revolution against him in 1979.
The Russians tried to ban their culture in Afghanistan, and they fought a 10 year war to drive them out. (Of course, it didn't help that we were arming the crazies.)
Now, PRAGMATICALLY, 40 years ago, our problem in the middle east was not "Jihadism". Our problem was secular leaders like Nassir, Assad, Saddam, Khadafy, Arafat who were pro-Soviet, pan-Arab nationalists who figured out that they could use oil to wage economic war on us AND fund a lot of bad people we didn't like.
And we (Which is to say the Jews and the Oil Companies) thought this was so horrible, that we threw in with people like Bin Laden and the Saudis, who were the religious nuts of the region because they were OUR kind of religious nuts.
And then we scratched our big monkey heads when we realized that Communism wasn't the only western philosophy they weren't keen on.
Just make sure you keep a scorecard of who we are arming now to fight ISIS and Al Qaeda, because they'll be our next enemy in 20 years. and you STILL won't get it.
Now we could do the rational pragmatic thing, of not getting involved in their fights (this includes not supporting the Zionist Entity) and take some of the 700 BILLION we spend every year playing hall monitor in the Middle East and spend it on energy independence.
You know, like we should have done 40 years ago, the first time they tried this nonsense.