Why exactly does America need the Republican Party?

[Doc1]

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

 

[francoHFW]

80% tax rates !!!!!!!!!

For the "common good" !!!!!!!

For income over 40 million or something... Poor things...

Off the backs of the proletariat no less !!!
They be Owed....... lmfao

Dems do nothing but ask for higher taxes on the bloated, lightly taxed rich to pay for a desperately needed infrastructure jobs bill and increased services and cheaper loans and training, as well as tax cuts for the rest. You dupes don't even know it. Our media gabfests for ratings and lack of news and journalism are a disgrace. As for your RW bs/hate propaganda machine- off the charts. Thank god Murdoch Sr and Rush are going to retire soon. They've been a catastrophe for the country, along with you angry ignorant white dupes...

 

[francoHFW]

80% tax rates !!!!!!!!!

For the "common good" !!!!!!!

For income over 40 million or something... Poor things...

Off the backs of the proletariat no less !!!
They be Owed....... lmfao

BS,read something.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 60 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 35 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = http://www.businessinsider.com/15-c...lity-in-america-2010-4?slop=1#slideshow-start

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

 

[francoHFW]

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

 

[Doc1]

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

If you had a brain you'd want to go back to our Constitutionally prescribed Republic where the Gov runs as it's supposed to.

 

[Doc1]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Meaning of course you just want to make up your own figures.

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

 

[Doc1]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

 

[francoHFW]

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

If you had a brain you'd want to go back to our Constitutionally prescribed Republic where the Gov runs as it's supposed to.

I think I'l go with our Supreme Court and Justice system rather than HS grad bought off ex-cokehead DJ pundits and RWNJs, thanks.

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Meaning of course you just want to make up your own figures.

The only people making up figures are your bought off heroes. DUHHHH...

 

[Doc1]

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

Tell me. What good has it done for this country? Tax cuts have been proven to cause more harm than good. That has always seemed to be their biggest selling point. Guess what? It wasn't tax cuts that created economic growth during Reagan's years. If it was, we would have seen massive job growth during Bush Jr.'s years. We didn't. Job growth was pitiful until Obama came into office. In fact, we wouldn't have had the economic collapse in 2008 in the first place if republican policies worked. 2.5x more private sector jobs were created in Obama's 5 years than in Bush's 8. Guess what saved the economy, Pubs? DEMAND side economics. That was Obama's stimulus package. It has proven to be much more successful than supply side. The obvious reason why the unemployment rate is higher under Obama is because the economic collapse happened 4 month before Obama was sworn in! Obviously the several millions of jobs we lost would translate into a higher unemployment rate in his years. Whether you cons want to admit it or not, Obama inherited a steaming mess. Luckily Obama's stimulus turned the free fall into growth. Unfortunately, we still have a way to go. Obama himself has admitted that. Slow is better than nothing.

Why Extended Federal Unemployment Benefits Boost the Economy

(Explains why tax cuts do more harm than good and why Obama's demand side economics were such a success).

Obama?s Numbers, October Update

More Jobs Created Under Obama Than Bush, Non-Partisan Report Finds | Politics And Regulation | Minyanville's Wall Street

Come on. This is the party that convinced their base that tax cuts pay for themselves. Knuckle dragging logic. I don't pretend that democrats are the heroes, but there is no denying that democratic economic policies have worked.

So tell me repubs. What do you have to show for yourselves? Reagan? Please. That was decades ago. Nowadays you got nothing. There is no evidence republicanism has done this country any good. Bush jr. drove this country into the ground.

Tell me what would Romney have accomplished? Government spending would have continued under his reign. Private sector job growth was already happening under Obama. And healthcare? RomneyCare? Tell me, what exactly made Romney/Heritage's healthcare system any better than Obama's? Answer: nothing. Why? Because it is the same damn plan!

Oh, and the massive income disparity in this country? The massive gap between the middle class and the wealthy? We can easily blame that on republicanism. Since 2009, 95% of income gains have gone to the wealthiest Americans despite the massive productivity that the lower classes have accomplished.

95% Of Income Gains Since 2009 Went To The Top 1% — Here's What That Really Means

The Nation doesn't need either party. We need to take the of out o the handoff Professional Politicians and restore the Constitution to it's rightful place of supremacy.

If you knew the facts, you'd realize the Dems are the answer- all you dupes get is BS and character assassination from your propaganda service and your bought off pols. The GOP has blocked everything important except ACA (partially blocked and sabotaged) since LBJ. The Dems need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything.

If you had a brain you'd want to go back to our Constitutionally prescribed Republic where the Gov runs as it's supposed to.

I think I'l go with our Supreme Court and Justice system rather than HS grad bought off ex-cokehead DJ pundits and RWNJs, thanks.

If you had an education you'd know that there are supposed to be 3 branches with the Executive Branch being the most powerful. You don't have one though so that ship has sailed.

 

[Doc1]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I wouldn't mind living in France half the time (Franco stands for Francophile) but after a year or so I start to miss a-holes like you- not their dumbass politics tho...

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

What a gd idiot. They did make a lot of progress in the 8 years before Bush wrecked the world. Almost eliminated illiteracy, homelessness; halved poverty. Maduro is no Hugo- you do realize the still powerful oligarchs do a lot of sabotage- sort of like the GOP/cronies and ACA...

 

[Doc1]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I wouldn't mind living in France half the time (Franco stands for Francophile) but after a year or so I start to miss a-holes like you- not their dumbass politics tho...

When one has no defense, one deflects.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Democrats ran the worst, most corrupt, most incompeten criiminal candidate in US history while cheating, engaging in election fraud, violence, and trying to strip Americans of their Freedom of speech...called for military coups, threatened Electoral College voters in an illegal attempt to overturn the legal election, and called for the assassination of the newly elected President...

...and Snowflakes ask why America needs Republicans....

BWUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

you somehow left out that since nov 22nd 1963 when our last great president was in office,that every president since then has been worse and more evil and corrupt than the previous one.I hope trump reverses that trend.

some people like this easy nut is in denial just how corrupt our government really is and afraid of the truth and can only post a smiley in defeat.lol

 

[francoHFW]

....to keep you communist freeloaders from destroying the USA?

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

Of course you do. Hey we're still the greatest, even pandering to the greedy idiot rich, and great people, except those running the RW propaganda bs/hate propaganda machine. Even the dupes have their limits, except for about 20% alt right (TOTALLY duped haters)...

 

[Doc1]

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

What a gd idiot. They did make a lot of progress in the 8 years before Bush wrecked the world. Almost eliminated illiteracy, homelessness; halved poverty. Maduro is no Hugo- you do realize the still powerful oligarchs do a lot of sabotage- sort of like the GOP/cronies and ACA...

Typical shit from people like you. BUSH DID IT. You're dismissed lil fella.