Why exactly does America need the Republican Party?

[Doc1]

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

Of course you do. Hey we're still the greatest, even pandering to the greedy idiot rich, and great people, except those running the RW propaganda bs/hate propaganda machine. Even the dupes have their limits, except for about 20% alt right (TOTALLY duped haters)...

Nope, I use losers like you for Sport. I have nothing to bitch about.

 

[francoHFW]

There is no difference between the number of white freeloaders in the 2 parties. The discriminated against blacks and other minorities scew the figures.

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I wouldn't mind living in France half the time (Franco stands for Francophile) but after a year or so I start to miss a-holes like you- not their dumbass politics tho...

When one has no defense, one deflects.

France is much better a comparison than poor old, 3rd world Venezuela. Still, not the good old, poor old (Thanks New BS GOP) USA. You know, having good infrastructure, health care, and good pay, parental leave, and vacations doesn't mean you have to give up your crusty, gadabout eccentricity....just our slowly decrepiting non rich class...

 

[Doc1]

So much bullshit from such a small man.

 

[francoHFW]

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

What a gd idiot. They did make a lot of progress in the 8 years before Bush wrecked the world. Almost eliminated illiteracy, homelessness; halved poverty. Maduro is no Hugo- you do realize the still powerful oligarchs do a lot of sabotage- sort of like the GOP/cronies and ACA...

Typical shit from people like you. BUSH DID IT. You're dismissed lil fella.

Of course he, Cheney, and the Boooshies and their pals in Wall St etc did it. Just like 1928 and 1989. Duhhhh. Boosh and Trump may be idiots, but the rest weren't.

 

[francoHFW]

So much bullshit from such a small man.

6'4" Masters in History, writer, enjoys many beers and whiskeys with my friends the dupes- district went 73% Trump- they believed all the character assassination of Dems and believe blacks are stupid, lazy, and violent- county is 0.29% black (Very like Brexit vote- the less the voter knew immigrants, the more they voted against them- 2nd worst RW in the modern world. No politics please. I am a Buddhist Catholic Quaker Muslim Episcopalian. I may go to India Nepal to study Hinduism. I don't get it. I think you'll find you're the smaller man as long as you make silly personal insults. Cut the crap.

 

[francoHFW]

Democrats ran the worst, most corrupt, most incompeten criiminal candidate in US history while cheating, engaging in election fraud, violence, and trying to strip Americans of their Freedom of speech...called for military coups, threatened Electoral College voters in an illegal attempt to overturn the legal election, and called for the assassination of the newly elected President...

...and Snowflakes ask why America needs Republicans....

BWUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

you somehow left out that since nov 22nd 1963 when our last great president was in office,that every president since then has been worse and more evil and corrupt than the previous one.I hope trump reverses that trend.

some people like this easy nut is in denial just how corrupt our government really is and afraid of the truth and can only post a smiley in defeat.lol

Republican Gov't, yes, dupe. All about steeringmoney to cronies and the greedy idiot GOP rich.

 

[The Derp]

Tell me. What good has it done for this country?

The Republican Party and Conservative Movement practice fiscal terrorism; they deliberately manufacture deficits and debt with their tax cuts, then use those deficits and debts as an excuse to cut spending they are ideologically opposed to, but lack the courage and/or support to repeal through legislation. Then, when spending is cut, the cuts are almost always operational which causes the programs to fail. Then Conservatives point to the failing programs as an excuse to sell them off to private interests who profit at the expense of taxpayers without producing any improved outcomes (see: private prisons, charter schools).

Wash, rinse, repeat over the last 37 years.

 

[francoHFW]

Communism? LOL, dupe. That's a dictatorship that runs and owns all industry and business. Doesn't exist anywhere but N. Korea, certainly not here. SOCIALISM is defined since WWII at least as always democratic, well regulated capitalism with a good safety net. Except in ignorant dupe world, of course- the world's laughingstock and horror. Change the channel half the time fer chrissake...

Move to Venezuela Komrade.

Why would I do that, nutter? Plus, you CAN'T unless you're richer than me. Idiot ignoramuses. Stop wrecking the country, brainwashed functional moron.

I'm not the one bitching and moaning about everything child, you are. Venezuela is your Socialist Utopia, go.

Of course you do. Hey we're still the greatest, even pandering to the greedy idiot rich, and great people, except those running the RW propaganda bs/hate propaganda machine. Even the dupes have their limits, except for about 20% alt right (TOTALLY duped haters)...

Nope, I use losers like you for Sport. I have nothing to bitch about.

You certainly bitch about those who know more than you...Dems to be exact. Maybe you should look past your nose and whatever small %age of facts you get.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

80% tax rates !!!!!!!!!

For the "common good" !!!!!!!

For income over 40 million or something... Poor things...

Off the backs of the proletariat no less !!!
They be Owed....... lmfao

BS,read something.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 60 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 35 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Those workers must be magic!
Do they produce more all by themselves?
Or is there any company equipment involved?


A 13% drop since 1980

You don't think workers can get more than 100% of a company's earnings, forever, do you?

I mean, I know you're a liberal, and therefore clueless about business and economics, but that's some seriously bad math you're pushing for.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Anyone who would advocate a single party system, anyone who would suggest the dissolution of one party over another, is a fool.

/--- No they would be a Communist. Cuba has one party rule. Nice place to live?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[francoHFW]

80% tax rates !!!!!!!!!

For the "common good" !!!!!!!

For income over 40 million or something... Poor things...

Off the backs of the proletariat no less !!!
They be Owed....... lmfao

BS,read something.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 60 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 35 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Those workers must be magic!
Do they produce more all by themselves?
Or is there any company equipment involved?


A 13% drop since 1980

You don't think workers can get more than 100% of a company's earnings, forever, do you?

I mean, I know you're a liberal, and therefore clueless about business and economics, but that's some seriously bad math you're pushing for.

In the fifties, CEOS made 23x the average workers pay, 40 times when Reagan started, now over 300x, with other officers same deal, dupe.

If the amount workers can save goes from 10% to -1%, I'd call that a disaster for everyone. And your comment idiotic.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
Great job!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

80% tax rates !!!!!!!!!

For the "common good" !!!!!!!

For income over 40 million or something... Poor things...

Off the backs of the proletariat no less !!!
They be Owed....... lmfao

BS,read something.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 60 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 35 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Those workers must be magic!
Do they produce more all by themselves?
Or is there any company equipment involved?


A 13% drop since 1980

You don't think workers can get more than 100% of a company's earnings, forever, do you?

I mean, I know you're a liberal, and therefore clueless about business and economics, but that's some seriously bad math you're pushing for.

In the fifties, CEOS made 23x the average workers pay, 40 times when Reagan started, now over 300x, with other officers same deal, dupe.

If the amount workers can save goes from 10% to -1%, I'd call that a disaster for everyone. And your comment idiotic.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
Great job!

In the fifties, CEOS made 23x the average workers pay

So what?

now over 300x,

You're wrong. You're either lying, or stupid. Probably both.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Yes folks........the likes of Bills wife, Pelosi, Reid, Gore, Sanders, Warren, Stein, Brown, DeBlasio, and Waters are what America "needs"............lol

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Because we were not the Democrats?

You know the guys that brought us the KKK, the Jim Crow Laws? Those guys?

Why does it matter what democrats did decades ago?

Because they are still doing the same thing now.

 

[francoHFW]

For income over 40 million or something... Poor things...

Off the backs of the proletariat no less !!!
They be Owed....... lmfao

BS,read something.

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 60 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 35 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
4 = Federated Prudent Bear Fund (A): Overview
4 = The Fed - Financial Accounts of the United States - Z.1 - Current Release
5/6 = 15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Those workers must be magic!
Do they produce more all by themselves?
Or is there any company equipment involved?


A 13% drop since 1980

You don't think workers can get more than 100% of a company's earnings, forever, do you?

I mean, I know you're a liberal, and therefore clueless about business and economics, but that's some seriously bad math you're pushing for.

In the fifties, CEOS made 23x the average workers pay, 40 times when Reagan started, now over 300x, with other officers same deal, dupe.

If the amount workers can save goes from 10% to -1%, I'd call that a disaster for everyone. And your comment idiotic.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
Great job!

In the fifties, CEOS made 23x the average workers pay

So what?

now over 300x,

You're wrong. You're either lying, or stupid. Probably both.

Speak for yourself, superdupe.
Top CEOs make more than 300 times the average worker | Fortune.com
fortune.com/2015/06/22/ceo-vs-worker-pay/
Jun 22, 2015 - With these increases in mind, it should come as no surprise that the ratio between averageAmerican CEO pay and worker pay is now 303-to-1.
CEO pay is 300 times greater than their employees - Jun. 22, 2015
money.cnn.com/2015/06/22/news/companies/ceo-pay/index.html
Jun 22, 2015 - The average total compensation of CEOs at the 350 largest firms, including stock options and other bonuses, came to $16.3 million in 2014, according to EPI. That compares to just over $50,000 inpay for their workers.
Top CEOs Make 300 Times More than Typical Workers: Pay Growth ...
www.epi.org/.../top-ceos-make-300-times-more-than-workers-pay-growth-surpasses-...
Jun 21, 2015 - The CEO-to-worker compensation ratio, 20-to-1 in 1965, peaked at .... Average worker paysaw relatively strong growth over that period ...
Why corporate CEO pay is so high, and going higher - CNBC.com
www.cnbc.com/2015/05/.../why-corporate-ceo-pay-is-so-high-and-going-higher.html
May 18, 2015 - The average corporate CEO makes 373 times the average worker. ... The shift toward cashnow may reflect higher stock prices, according to the ...


And you're an INTERESTED GOPer...

 

[francoHFW]

Because we were not the Democrats?

You know the guys that brought us the KKK, the Jim Crow Laws? Those guys?

Why does it matter what democrats did decades ago?

Because they are still doing the same thing now.

The hel they are, dupe. You really believe the Dems are the racists? LOL? So what % of convention goers are minorities in each party do you think?

 

[francoHFW]

Yes folks........the likes of Bills wife, Pelosi, Reid, Gore, Sanders, Warren, Stein, Brown, DeBlasio, and Waters are what America "needs"............lol

Damn straight, dupe. After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!! Not to mention W's 9/11, stupidest wars ever, AND a world depression....HELLOOO?!?

 

[LogikAndReazon]

CEO compensation exploded under Bill Clinton....(D)
This is a well documented fact.
Thanks for playing.......

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Caps on income are needed !!!!!!

For the people Comrades !!!

 

[Doc1]

So much bullshit from such a small man.

6'4" Masters in History, writer, enjoys many beers and whiskeys with my friends the dupes- district went 73% Trump- they believed all the character assassination of Dems and believe blacks are stupid, lazy, and violent- county is 0.29% black (Very like Brexit vote- the less the voter knew immigrants, the more they voted against them- 2nd worst RW in the modern world. No politics please. I am a Buddhist Catholic Quaker Muslim Episcopalian. I may go to India Nepal to study Hinduism. I don't get it. I think you'll find you're the smaller man as long as you make silly personal insults. Cut the crap.

So you keep telling everyone, here's a little factoid for you. The more you have to tell everyone how big and how educated you are actually means that in direct proportion the opposite is true. You're a little man hiding behind a computer acting like a bully and a badass. I'll tell you what derp, dupe, pussy, YOU quit throwing around the insults and I'll leave you alone. Until then you'll be my bitch. Fact lil man, the Country is in the toilet because the system you adore is all a lie.