Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so uh, like the biggest state wouldnt make sense?
The Electoral Vote is not one person, one vote.We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic.Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.America is 80% Christian.
If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.
Not Iowa.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.
"A religious group"?
NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
Only Propositions are Democratic and they are written by committee.
so uh, like the biggest state wouldnt make sense?
Why? THe biggest State already has the most representatives in Congress.
You sure it needs more impact?
That woman has a KNIFE. Clearly, Iowans need all the entertainment they can find. And direct tv cuts out in blizzards.Iowa has four times more hogs than humans, and Jodi Ernst has touched every one of their testicles.
Jealous?
so uh, like the biggest state wouldnt make sense?
Why? THe biggest State already has the most representatives in Congress.
You sure it needs more impact?
Why not? They have more people which is a better representation.
If all you got for every answer is "Why not?" I think we're done here.
Caucuses based on Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage sound bites are idiotic and have proven, thankfully, to be failures.The Electoral Vote is not one person, one vote.We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic.Strawman...allowing a religious group to determine legislation is dangerous at best.
Wait until we have a significant Islamic population and you'll shit in your pants.
"A religious group"?
NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
Only Propositions are Democratic and they are written by committee.
That would be very relevant if I was claiming that we had Direct Democracy or Pure Democracy.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
Scarier than Muslims!Mooslims are scary.
Caucuses based on Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage sound bites are idiotic and have proven, thankfully, to be failures.The Electoral Vote is not one person, one vote.We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic."A religious group"?
NOt sure what you mean. That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in any form of democracy.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
Only Propositions are Democratic and they are written by committee.
That would be very relevant if I was claiming that we had Direct Democracy or Pure Democracy.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
We are suffering through nothing more than a media circus.
No Trump, no Sanders, no ratings.
Are you talking biggest by population or land mass?If you don't like Iowa being first which state would you have be first and why?
The biggest state would make more sense.
Are you talking biggest by population or land mass?If you don't like Iowa being first which state would you have be first and why?
The biggest state would make more sense.
So if you do that aren't you eliminating a lot of the lesser known candidates right off the bat because of how much more it would cost to campaign in those states? I can't see Barak Obama winning the 2008 Democratic nomination if he had to go and campaign in say California and Texas right at the start.Are you talking biggest by population or land mass?If you don't like Iowa being first which state would you have be first and why?
The biggest state would make more sense.
Population because land cant vote
============No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.Why the Iowa hate?
America is 80% Christian.
If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.
Not Iowa.
Oligarchy.Caucuses based on Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage sound bites are idiotic and have proven, thankfully, to be failures.The Electoral Vote is not one person, one vote.We don't have a Democracy, we have a correct Representative Republic.
With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
Only Propositions are Democratic and they are written by committee.
That would be very relevant if I was claiming that we had Direct Democracy or Pure Democracy.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
We are suffering through nothing more than a media circus.
No Trump, no Sanders, no ratings.
Yes. Despite the fact that the nation is over 80% Christian, Christian positions have not been the basis of our laws on two divisive social issues.
It seems you have your wish. We are not a democracy.
What do you call it when a small group of people rule against the democratically enacted wishes of a population?
So if you do that aren't you eliminating a lot of the lesser known candidates right off the bat because of how much more it would cost to campaign in those states? I can't see Barak Obama winning the 2008 Democratic nomination if he had to go and campaign in say California and Texas right at the start.Are you talking biggest by population or land mass?If you don't like Iowa being first which state would you have be first and why?
The biggest state would make more sense.
Population because land cant vote
============No hate; just tired of hearing that sucking up to a religious group is essential in a nation of religious freedom.Why the Iowa hate?
America is 80% Christian.
If you don't like the idea that Christians get input in the political process your problem is that you live in a democratic nation and you don't like democracy.
Not Iowa.
In reality, only 16% of Americans report attending church on a weekly basis.
...d.
Doesnt it seem weird that a state like Iowa is determined as being so damn important?
Oligarchy.Caucuses based on Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage sound bites are idiotic and have proven, thankfully, to be failures.The Electoral Vote is not one person, one vote.With many democratic features including democratic election of all our legislators and Presidents.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
Only Propositions are Democratic and they are written by committee.
That would be very relevant if I was claiming that we had Direct Democracy or Pure Democracy.
YOur evasive semantics are very revealing.
That vast majority of the American population is Christian.
You can't avoid "allowing a religious group" to determine legislation if you believe in our form of democratic Representative Republic.
And yes. We should consider the effect of a Islamic Immigration on future legislation before we allow it.
HOw much would you be willing to see women's liberation turned back as we become more diverse?
We are suffering through nothing more than a media circus.
No Trump, no Sanders, no ratings.
Yes. Despite the fact that the nation is over 80% Christian, Christian positions have not been the basis of our laws on two divisive social issues.
It seems you have your wish. We are not a democracy.
What do you call it when a small group of people rule against the democratically enacted wishes of a population?
I didn't claim they did but the reality is it takes less money to campaign in Iowa than it does a large state. The larger the state you need more offices more staff more air time more everything which will mean you need more money to start something a lot of potential candidates won't have which will limit your field to those with the highest name recognition and bank accounts.So if you do that aren't you eliminating a lot of the lesser known candidates right off the bat because of how much more it would cost to campaign in those states? I can't see Barak Obama winning the 2008 Democratic nomination if he had to go and campaign in say California and Texas right at the start.Are you talking biggest by population or land mass?If you don't like Iowa being first which state would you have be first and why?
The biggest state would make more sense.
Population because land cant vote
They didnt pick Iowa first to save campaign money.