Why is Biden too old but Trump is not?

[Faun]

Please tell us why there is such a double standard. Why didn’t Hillary Clinton get into trouble for deleting over 33,000 E Mails. ? That’s just for STARTERS. Biden didn’t get into any trouble for having classified documents in his GARAGE BEFORE he was President?? That’s for starters . Love these Libs with their Hypocrisy

There's no proof Hillary deliberately deleted classified documents. And who said Biden isn't in trouble? He's still under investigation but still can't be indicted until he's out of office.

 

[BothWings]

Biden is not aging well. He cannot field questions, falls all the time, forgets what he's saying and gets lost even trying to leave a stage. Biden is presiding over the highest inflation in decades, highest gas prices and a war all of which he caused by his lack of coherence.

Trump is sharp, can field questions, was successful in creating a great American economy, had no wars during his time as POTUS and lowest gas prices as well as lowest interest rates.

It's not chronological age, idiot.

The war was started by his former boss back in 2014. Obummer already had his two tenures in office. Now they are depending on puppet Biden to continue "Operation: Infiltrate-Ukraine-And-Turn-It-Against-Russia" but Biden is just not capable or coherent enough to see it through.

 

[Faun]

Link?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2023/06/trump-indictment.pdf

Loading…

www.politico.com

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000187-4dd5-dfdf-af9f-4dfda6e80000

 

[jbander]

Biden is so incompetent and senile its a real joke that isnt that funny anymore

and Trump is as bad or worse along with being a pile of shit as a human, being a criminal and a traitor to this country, I'll take Biden any day of the week. You won't find Biden being a traitor or try to bring down our democracy. The comparison is like comparing gold to shit. Trump is total scum.

 

[jbander]

Trump is too old too. We need someone under 55. They might actually try to save Social Security since they are the ones about to lose it if the GOP has its way.

You vote for the hate party and you are voting to bring down SS, medicare, education , destroy the care of vets and joining a party of traitors.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

 

[krichton]

Why is Biden too old but Trump is not? They are basically the same age - old. So why is there only concern over Biden being old.

There is a difference between being old and being old and frail. Biden has the energy level of someone who has one foot in the grave. It's why his legal name is Sleepy Joe. Whereas Trump has retard energy, because his brain doesn't draw away any energy from the rest of his body.

 

[BackAgain]

It’s a given that you have no clue.

It is a given that you’d be babbling.

 

[BackAgain]

The 71 felonies he’s indicted for of course.

Indictments are mere charges. Not convictions. But Fakey is too fucking fully stupid to handle these easy and obvious concepts.

 

[Arlette]

Indictments are mere charges. Not convictions. But Fakey is too fucking fully stupid to handle these easy and obvious concepts.

Why sure. Who among us doesn't have 70 felony indictments under our belt? I worked hard all my life and didn't manage to get a single one.

 

[Faun]

Indictments are mere charges. Not convictions. But Fakey is too fucking fully stupid to handle these easy and obvious concepts.

True, but indictments result in convictions some 98% of the time the defendant opts to fight it in court.

 

[Arlette]

Why sure. Who among us doesn't have 70 felony indictments under our belt? I worked hard all my life and didn't manage to get a single one.

That man is a walking crime spree

 

[BackAgain]

Why sure. Who among us doesn't have 70 felony indictments under our belt? I worked hard all my life and didn't manage to get a single one.

2 indictments. Multiple counts. In NY, they are basically all the same and all based on a ridiculous legal theory.

Similarly, most of the Federal charges relate to the very same alleged criminal acts.

You libturds are easily misled and willingly gullible.

 

[Arlette]

2 indictments. Multiple counte. In NY, they are basically all the same and all based on a ridiculous legal theory.

Similarly, most of the Federal charges relate to the very same alleged criminal acts.

You libturds are easily and willingly gullible.

The jury will render a verdict on each and every count. That's how we roll

 

[BackAgain]

The jury will render a verdict on each and every count. That's how we roll

Yes. And until then, he’s not guilty of a thing. Now THAT is how we roll.

 

[Arlette]

Yes. And until then, he’s not guilty of a thing. Now THAT is how we roll.

The presumption of innocence is a legal concept. The public at large is not held to such standards. Besides, there is just no way he will be innocent of all counts. We peppered him with so many that something will stick.

 

[bripat9643]

LMAO, your damn avatar indicates you are a dumbass. One's intelligence is not measured by how much one knows, it is measured by how much one knows they don't know. Trump thinks he knows everything, which means he is a total dumbass.

Every word of your post is wrong, dumbass.

 

[BackAgain]

The presumption of innocence is a legal concept.

So far so good. Let’s see where this latest brain fart takes you …

The public at large is not held to such standards.

Also true. You’re allowed to presume guilt if you wish to be so skewed and shallow minded.

Besides, there is just no way he will be innocent of all counts.

He is innocent of all counts. What you apparently intended to grunt out was that you find it unlikely that he will be fully acquitted. You may be right. You may be wrong.

We peppered him with so many that something will stick.

“We”?

You didn’t pepper him with anything. You’re just some random dufus.

And it’s not the number of counts (in either indictment) which controls. It’s whether or not the evidence proves the charge(s) beyond a reasonable doubt to all trial jurors. (It is also whether the legal foundation is valid in the first place.)

 

[Arlette]

So far so good. Let’s see where this latest brain fart takes you …

Also true. You’re allowed to presume guilt if you wish to be so skewed and shallow minded.

He is innocent of all counts. What you apparently intended to grunt out was that you find it unlikely that he will be fully acquitted. You may be right. You may be wrong.

“We”?

You didn’t pepper him with anything. You’re just some random dufus.

And it’s not the number of counts (in either indictment) which controls. It’s whether or not the evidence proves the charge(s) beyond a reasonable doubt to all trial jurors. (It is also whether the legal foundation is valid in the first place.)

Trust me. He gets nailed on some.

Arguing the legal foundation is for the appeal

 

[Faun]

Yes. And until then, he’s not guilty of a thing. Now THAT is how we roll.

There was a time Alex Murdaugh was not guilty of a thing.