Why is Building the Wall Wrong?

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nope. The most they did was write a letter around Christmas time if that. You mean we had no way to send money overseas back in the 60's and 70's?

Really?

Because I grew up in a town that was 30% Polish and 60% Italian. The Poles were essentially cut off from their homeland but the Italians were not. Their connection to Sicily and Naples was strong. And it included bringing over relatives and sending money back to help family back "home"

That didn't happen with most Europeans. People back then didn't have the money to send back home even if they wanted to. Many Europeans didn't believe in credit. If they didn't have money to pay for it, they figured they didn't have to have it. So what they saved they saved for themselves.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You DO see Republicans constantly defending employers who are the CAUSE of this problem. No jobs...no illegals

If they are defending the employers, why have I not seen one?

Your ENTIRE immigration policy...if it can be called that...centers on punishing illegals...

Newsflash. Punish them as much as you want...all it will do is give you a warm fuzzy (how disgusting is it that punishing people gives you a tingle?) . It won't solve the problem

Giving them drivers licenses, allowing them to work, sending their kids to our schools certainly won't solve the problem. At least we are trying to get a wall built, but guess who is stopping us?

A strong enough deterrent works every time it's tried.

 

[Lesh]

They kept as close as the infrastructure and technology allowed them to. You just pull shit like that out of your ass and try to polish it into gold?

That didn't happen with most Europeans. People back then didn't have the money to send back home even if they wanted to. Many Europeans didn't believe in credit. If they didn't have money to pay for it, they figured they didn't have to have it. So what they saved they saved for themselves.

You just agreed with me...dumfuk

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They kept as close as the infrastructure and technology allowed them to. You just pull shit like that out of your ass and try to polish it into gold?

That didn't happen with most Europeans. People back then didn't have the money to send back home even if they wanted to. Many Europeans didn't believe in credit. If they didn't have money to pay for it, they figured they didn't have to have it. So what they saved they saved for themselves.

You just agreed with me...dumfuk

Learn how to read dumbfuck.

 

[Lesh]

If they are defending the employers, why have I not seen one?

Look at every.....single....thread where immigration is brought up and you will see "leftists" pointing out employers as the problem and Trumpers either defending employers or ignoring that aspect completely.
'
And in the press?

Not a WORD about employers

Republican politicians?

Not a word

You "see" what you want to see...and what you want to see are dark skinned immigrants punished...because it makes you feel good.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What we need to do is tax remittances. A heavy tax. Reducing the amount of money sent back home would discourage many. The tax would also pay fot the wall.

 

[Esmeralda]

It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALL

A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.

 

[BrokeLoser]

If they are defending the employers, why have I not seen one?

Look at every.....single....thread where immigration is brought up and you will see "leftists" pointing out employers as the problem and Trumpers either defending employers or ignoring that aspect completely.
'
And in the press?

Not a WORD about employers

Republican politicians?

Not a word

You "see" what you want to see...and what you want to see are dark skinned immigrants punished...because it makes you feel good.

Your argument is one often used by desperate fools. In the real world when you have a problem you track it to its root / origin. The problem with illegals is at the border and not In the strawberry field.
Further, the reality is, the majority of wetbacks work for other wetbacks off the books...that’s certainly the case in the wetback capital of the world, south Mexifornia. The demand for their services leaves when they leave. You see, the wetback slave trade is mostly utilized by wetbacks. It’s a self serving, black market, underground economy within a legitimate economy.
That’s right, Rodrigos Tires, Gustavo’s Auto Body, Guadalupes House Cleaning, Manuel’s Landscape Service and Alejandro’s Carniceria employ the bulk of the cockroaches in south Mexifornia.

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALL

A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.

That’s weird...Esmeralda, a Spaniard is against good Americans keeping wetbacks out....FUCKING WEIRD!

 

[danielpalos]

What we need to do is tax remittances. A heavy tax. Reducing the amount of money sent back home would discourage many. The tax would also pay fot the wall.

They have Home Depot in Mexico now.

 

[danielpalos]

It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALL

A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.

the right wing is for Trade Barriers not Free Trade.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALL

A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.

The only reason you on the left are afraid of a wall is because you know it would work. It would greatly reduce the amount of illegals coming to this country and the illegal narcotics to boot. This isn't 1944. We have technology today that could detect people building tunnels under a wall. Furthermore the estimated cost for the wall is about 30 billion dollars. That's about half of what we spend in just one year on food stamps.

 

[Oddball]

A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux

1) Because it could be used to keep us in.

2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

If they are defending the employers, why have I not seen one?

Look at every.....single....thread where immigration is brought up and you will see "leftists" pointing out employers as the problem and Trumpers either defending employers or ignoring that aspect completely.
'
And in the press?

Not a WORD about employers

Republican politicians?

Not a word

You "see" what you want to see...and what you want to see are dark skinned immigrants punished...because it makes you feel good.

That's different than saying Republicans are for employers using illegals. We know that's a small part of the problem, but people come here for more than just work. Over half of the immigrants in the US today are on some sort of welfare program.

Look at who was complaining when Trump said the 14th amendment needs to be looked at. It certainly wasn't Republicans. Democrats want anchor babies because they know that attracts the adults to the country illegally.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALL

A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.

Derp!

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .

More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .

None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALL

A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.

The only reason you on the left are afraid of a wall is because you know it would work. It would greatly reduce the amount of illegals coming to this country and the illegal narcotics to boot. This isn't 1944. We have technology today that could detect people building tunnels under a wall. Furthermore the estimated cost for the wall is about 30 billion dollars. That's about half of what we spend in just one year on food stamps.

I find it quite fascinating that Loons Lesh are so quick to blame employers for incentivizing wetbacks yet they’ll never once suggest that .gov and sanctuary states stop incentivizing them....Why is that?
When is the last time you heard a LefTard suggest that we refuse to educate them and treat them in our medical facilities?
Would Democrats really vote to remove all incentives for illegals?

 

[Nova78]

 

[BrokeLoser]

A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above

The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes

You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours

There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.

-Geaux

1) Because it could be used to keep us in.

2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.

Haha...another “walls don’t work” dumbass.

 

[Oddball]

1) Because it could be used to keep us in.

2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.

Haha...another “walls don’t work” dumbass.

I said there are more cost effective ways to get the result, dumbass.

Reading for comprehension will really build up you communication skills.

 

[BrokeLoser]

1) Because it could be used to keep us in.

2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.

Haha...another “walls don’t work” dumbass.

I said there are more cost effective ways to get the result, dumbass.

Reading for comprehension will really build up you communication skills.[/QUOTE]

Okay cool wack...you must be waiting for someone to play along...I’ll play. What are those “more cost effective ways”?