Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said there are more cost effective ways to get the result, dumbass.Oddball said:1) Because it could be used to keep us in.
2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.
Haha...another “walls don’t work” dumbass.
Reading for comprehension will really build up you communication skills.
You're a loudmouthed idiot. Of COURSE drugs and the corruption that goes with them is why Honduras is a "shithole"bullshit. Drug dealers aren't responsible for making countries like Honduras into shit holes.
I'm against all subsidies and always in favor of cost effectiveness.....You have NFI who you're talking to, do you?Now it's about cost. It wasn't about cost to give subsides to people to buy electric cars. It wasn't about cost when DumBama expanded the food stamp program. It wasn't about cost to send money to Planned Parenthood. But now? Now it's about cost.
The next Obama can't make a wall disappear with the stroke of a pen. He can't also fail to staff it without it being obvious. In the first place, Dims refuse to fund your "intensive measures," and the next Obama will make them disappear.Why not some of both? No walls in some places just make it more labor intensive to catch the border jumpers. All your ideas are excellent, but giving Donald his Wall, in strategic places, is not a bad idea. We can afford it. Don't let them fool you.It’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .
More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .
I'm against all subsidies and always in favor of cost effectiveness.....You have NFI who you're talking to, do you?Now it's about cost. It wasn't about cost to give subsides to people to buy electric cars. It wasn't about cost when DumBama expanded the food stamp program. It wasn't about cost to send money to Planned Parenthood. But now? Now it's about cost.
I'll score the answer to my question a big "YES"...AMF.I'm against all subsidies and always in favor of cost effectiveness.....You have NFI who you're talking to, do you?Now it's about cost. It wasn't about cost to give subsides to people to buy electric cars. It wasn't about cost when DumBama expanded the food stamp program. It wasn't about cost to send money to Planned Parenthood. But now? Now it's about cost.
No I don't. Is this you Barack?
I said there are more cost effective ways to get the result, dumbass.Oddball said:1) Because it could be used to keep us in.
2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.
Haha...another “walls don’t work” dumbass.
Reading for comprehension will really build up you communication skills.
Now it's about cost. It wasn't about cost to give subsides to people to buy electric cars. It wasn't about cost when DumBama expanded the food stamp program. It wasn't about cost to send money to Planned Parenthood. But now? Now it's about cost.
I'm against all subsidies and always in favor of cost effectiveness.....You have NFI who you're talking to, do you?Now it's about cost. It wasn't about cost to give subsides to people to buy electric cars. It wasn't about cost when DumBama expanded the food stamp program. It wasn't about cost to send money to Planned Parenthood. But now? Now it's about cost.
Ships and planes are easy to police. Everyone on a plane or a ship has to go through immigration. Your belief that it's easy to get in that way is pure idiocy. Digging under the wall or climbing over it have also been demonstrated to be easily thwarted. All it takes is some listening devices and some guards watching for people trying to climb over. You must assume that ICE is staffed by congenital morons. I have news for you: They aren't as stupid as you are.A wall does not prohibit someone from walking in. They can arrive by air or sea, for example. They can go to Canada and then walk over the border. They can dig under the wall or climb over it. Use your brain. The wall Trump and his minions want is a SYMBOL and a symbol only. A symbol of him looking like he is doing something. A symbol that will cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars and essentially do nothing.None of the things you listed prohibits someone from walking into OUR NATION. You know what does? A WALLIt’s a waste of money . If the goal is to address illegal immigration, then that money is better spent in other ways .
More ins agents , more immigrantion courts , more judges . More enforcement vs companies who hire illegals . That’s a better use if the money .
No there aren't more cost effective ways.1) Because it could be used to keep us in.A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above
The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes
You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours
There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.
-Geaux
2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.
Whenever Dims start whining about the cost of something, you know they are full of shit.I said there are more cost effective ways to get the result, dumbass.Oddball said:1) Because it could be used to keep us in.
2) There are better and far more cost effective ways to do the job.
Haha...another “walls don’t work” dumbass.
Reading for comprehension will really build up you communication skills.
Now it's about cost. It wasn't about cost to give subsides to people to buy electric cars. It wasn't about cost when DumBama expanded the food stamp program. It wasn't about cost to send money to Planned Parenthood. But now? Now it's about cost.
Dude, you know I'm not a demoncrat....Knock it off with that shit.Whenever Dims start whining about the cost of something, you know they are full of shit.
You know the welfare moocher state is never going to be abolished. Getting the wall funded would be 1000 times easier.Um, yeah there are...Abolishing the expansive welfare moocher state is one.No there aren't more cost effective ways.
So certain are you.We have much more serious things to worry about if anyone contemplates preventing Americans from leaving.
I'm always against The State, while you lick its boots when the polish is flavored just right.You’re squirmy as fuck....you’re all over the place...you don’t know what you stand for.
Um, yeah there are...Abolishing the expansive welfare moocher state is one.
The only way to keep illegals out is first to stop international flights coming or going, build wall on Northern border, southern and along the shores of pacific, gulf of mexico and atlantic and hope no one can dig under one of the walls. Otherwise one fucking wall on the southern border means nothing. In other words seal off the U.S. and the citizens from anything or anyone from the outside world. Only then can the wacko's have peace.
