Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
A- Cost prohibitive
B- Won't work
C- It's racist
D- It would reduce those successfully crossing the border
E- None of the Above
The machine benefits by not having a wall. Business (Republicans) get their cheap labor and (Democrats) get the votes
You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours
There is no excuse for the Republicans not funding the wall.
-Geaux
1. The vast majority of illegal immigrants arrive here by jet, so at best it would be ineffective.
2. The wall would have to be an engineering miracle to cover the entire U.S. - Mexico border. It's costs would be astronomical.
3. It probably would not stop much illegal immigration at the U.S. - Mexico border. They'd just find a way to climb over it or tunnel under it. No matter how deep you make the walls foundation, they can always dig deeper.
4. The wall would provide a sense of false confidence that would result in the reduction of border patrols and we'd end up with MORE illegal immigrants crossing the U.S. - Mexican border than there are now.
5. The wall is simply an idiotic idea.
Hungary would debate you on every point, and unlike you, they have evidence to sustain their claim.
Hungary credits razor wire border fence for almost 100 percent drop in illegal migration
That's because nobody really wants to go to Hungary all that much anyway.
Sure. They built a wall because nobody wanted to go there.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com