Why Is Lt. Col. Vindman a War Hero but General Flynn a Traitor?

[The Purge]

The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a “bombshell” and “damning” was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda. Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor. As Newsbusters noted:


After a report on the California wildfires, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt told viewers “[t]here was dramatic testimony in the House impeachment investigation by a decorated war hero who works on the National Security Council and was among those who heard that phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart.”


Except that others on the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President, including those who were charged with producing transcript, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does. Certainly both participants on the call both said there was no pressure for Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden. As for the quid pro quo, we now know the Ukrainians didn’t learn until August military aid had been delayed. The phone call was in July. It’s hard to have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman’s problem with the call?


In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he “did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen.” Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump’s more powerful position in the world. As Fox News reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

 

[WillPower]

Spy/cutout/assassin...perfect and exactly the pecking order we know is being employed. The joker in the deck is Bolton, in my opinion the mastermind behind the plot. Schitt ain't smart enough to have dreamed this up...he's the punk Bolton or Brennan put the move on to carry out his plan to get Trump injured enough to lose in 2020.....They need to sniff out Bolton/Brennan and hang them from a mesquite branch. BTW, I believe Flynn is in the clear.

 

[Hossfly]

LTG. Michael Flynn was forced into early retirement because he disagreed with Holy Leader Obama's policies. He was one of the patriots Obama shit canned for saying they wouldn't fire on Americans IMO, LTC. Vindman is just another leftwinger who hears things that are not said and swears to it.

 

[WillPower]

LTG. Michael Flynn was forced into early retirement because he disagreed with Holy Leader Obama's policies. He was one of the patriots Obama shit canned for saying they wouldn't fire on Americans IMO, LTC. Vindman is just another leftwinger who hears things that are not said and swears to it.

I believe he's lobbying for his brothers in Ukraine. Funny how they've gotten their revenge on us not protecting them from the Ivans after we promised them we would to give up their nukes. Who will ever trust us again after that?

 

[Syriusly]

The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a “bombshell” and “damning” was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda. Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor. As Newsbusters noted:


After a report on the California wildfires, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt told viewers “[t]here was dramatic testimony in the House impeachment investigation by a decorated war hero who works on the National Security Council and was among those who heard that phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart.”


Except that others on the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President, including those who were charged with producing transcript, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does. Certainly both participants on the call both said there was no pressure for Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden. As for the quid pro quo, we now know the Ukrainians didn’t learn until August military aid had been delayed. The phone call was in July. It’s hard to have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman’s problem with the call?


In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he “did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen.” Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump’s more powerful position in the world. As Fox News reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Why do you think that Flynn is a traitor?

He is a highly decorated officer who confessed to his crimes.

 

[Syriusly]

LTG. Michael Flynn was forced into early retirement because he disagreed with Holy Leader Obama's policies. He was one of the patriots Obama shit canned for saying they wouldn't fire on Americans IMO, LTC. Vindman is just another leftwinger who hears things that are not said and swears to it.

And you base this all on........well you just pulled this out of your ass.

 

[Jitss617]

The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a “bombshell” and “damning” was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda. Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor. As Newsbusters noted:


After a report on the California wildfires, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt told viewers “[t]here was dramatic testimony in the House impeachment investigation by a decorated war hero who works on the National Security Council and was among those who heard that phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart.”


Except that others on the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President, including those who were charged with producing transcript, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does. Certainly both participants on the call both said there was no pressure for Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden. As for the quid pro quo, we now know the Ukrainians didn’t learn until August military aid had been delayed. The phone call was in July. It’s hard to have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman’s problem with the call?


In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he “did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen.” Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump’s more powerful position in the world. As Fox News reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Why do you think that Flynn is a traitor?

He is a highly decorated officer who confessed to his crimes.

What was the crime

 

[bodecea]

The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a “bombshell” and “damning” was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda. Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor. As Newsbusters noted:


After a report on the California wildfires, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt told viewers “[t]here was dramatic testimony in the House impeachment investigation by a decorated war hero who works on the National Security Council and was among those who heard that phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart.”


Except that others on the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President, including those who were charged with producing transcript, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does. Certainly both participants on the call both said there was no pressure for Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden. As for the quid pro quo, we now know the Ukrainians didn’t learn until August military aid had been delayed. The phone call was in July. It’s hard to have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman’s problem with the call?


In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he “did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen.” Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump’s more powerful position in the world. As Fox News reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Which one broke the law?

 

[Syriusly]

The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a “bombshell” and “damning” was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda. Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor. As Newsbusters noted:


After a report on the California wildfires, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt told viewers “[t]here was dramatic testimony in the House impeachment investigation by a decorated war hero who works on the National Security Council and was among those who heard that phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart.”


Except that others on the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President, including those who were charged with producing transcript, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does. Certainly both participants on the call both said there was no pressure for Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden. As for the quid pro quo, we now know the Ukrainians didn’t learn until August military aid had been delayed. The phone call was in July. It’s hard to have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman’s problem with the call?


In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he “did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen.” Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump’s more powerful position in the world. As Fox News reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Why do you think that Flynn is a traitor?

He is a highly decorated officer who confessed to his crimes.

What was the crime

Its publicly available- I think even Faux News reported it- go look it up.

 

[WillPower]

Which one broke the law?

Who threatened Flynn's kid with charges to coerce a "confession" out of the General? Got any idea what kind of prosecutors do that?....oh yeah, Kameltoe Harris...no wonder you dream of her at night.

 

[Jitss617]

The network coverage of the testimony of National Security Council staffer Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman as a “bombshell” and “damning” was laughable and dishonest, implying that his service to his country wearing its uniform made him credible and unbiased witness without a political agenda. Particularly egregious were the comments of NBC News anchor Lester Holt, who equated wartime courage with peacetime candor. As Newsbusters noted:


After a report on the California wildfires, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt told viewers “[t]here was dramatic testimony in the House impeachment investigation by a decorated war hero who works on the National Security Council and was among those who heard that phone call between President Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart.”


Except that others on the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President, including those who were charged with producing transcript, don’t quite remember the call the way Vindman does. Certainly both participants on the call both said there was no pressure for Ukraine to “dig up dirt” on former Vice President Joe Biden. As for the quid pro quo, we now know the Ukrainians didn’t learn until August military aid had been delayed. The phone call was in July. It’s hard to have a quid pro quo when the party being extorted is not told about the alleged quo. So just what was Vindman’s problem with the call?


In his opening statement, Vindman says he came forward because he “did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen.” Yet when pressed to explain where in the phone call transcript any demand was made, he lapsed into psychobabble about President Zelensky inferring a demand because of Trump’s more powerful position in the world. As Fox News reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Why do you think that Flynn is a traitor?

He is a highly decorated officer who confessed to his crimes.

What was the crime

Its publicly available- I think even Faux News reported it- go look it up.

I did, I can’t find it.. can you tell us right now in your worlds? Lol hehe
Yes it’s going to sound unsane that’s why you need to write it in your words lol

 

[Ridgerunner]

LTG. Michael Flynn should have his likeness carved in a mountain somewhere...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The clown wore full dress to hearings...and never did in daily life.

Lol

 

[bodecea]

Which one broke the law?

Who threatened Flynn's kid with charges to coerce a "confession" out of the General? Got any idea what kind of prosecutors do that?....oh yeah, Kameltoe Harris...no wonder you dream of her at night.

I don't know....who did? Would that be the same one threatening via a foreign quid pro quo Joe Biden's kid?

 

[bodecea]

The clown wore full dress to hearings...and never did in daily life.

Lol

Tell us more about what the military does, Threaty McThreat. His dress uniform IS his best clothes for formal occasions. Testifying to Congress is a very important, formal occasion. But as someone who never served, I'm sure you know ALL about it, right?

 

[WillPower]

The clown wore full dress to hearings...and never did in daily life.

Lol

And to a civilian event...even if he is still "active duty" (wink, nod), that was for the Rat press rodents..Notice they've been surrounding their "witnesses" with law officers coming to the Capitol...as if anybody gives a shit about harming them. Letting them testify "orange man bad" helps our cause, not the Rats...who gives a shit what their opinion of Trump's foreign policy is?

 

[bodecea]

LTG. Michael Flynn should have his likeness carved in a mountain somewhere...

Turkey.

 

[bodecea]

The clown wore full dress to hearings...and never did in daily life.

Lol

And to a civilian event...even if he is still "active duty" (wink, nod), that was for the Rat press rodents..Notice they've been surrounding their "witnesses" with law officers coming to the Capitol...as if anybody gives a shit about harming them. Letting them testify "orange man bad" helps our cause, not the Rats...who gives a shit what their opinion of Trump's foreign policy is?

Look...another CRC 'splaining when active duty military members should wear their uniform.

Tell us, when did you serve and which branch?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Flynn lied UNDER OATH after failing to register as a foreign agent when he should have.

Fin.

 

[Hossfly]

LTG. Michael Flynn was forced into early retirement because he disagreed with Holy Leader Obama's policies. He was one of the patriots Obama shit canned for saying they wouldn't fire on Americans IMO, LTC. Vindman is just another leftwinger who hears things that are not said and swears to it.

And you base this all on........well you just pulled this out of your ass.

Just so happens I know people who know the guy.