Why is Obama So Invested in 'Global Warming?

[PoliticalChic]

Students of geo-political history know why.
Here, the prologue to this story:


1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic.

The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government.
The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’
Which actually advances the greater good?


a. "Collectivization (1929-33) was the opening and defining phase of Stalin's untrammelled power: it was the first thing he did the moment his hands were free. As a crime against humanity it eclipses the Great Terror,...During Collectivization Stalin is reckoned to have killed about 4 million children. For the man himself, though, and for the man's psychology, the most salient feature of Collectivization was the abysmal depth, and gigantic reach, of its failure.....
Martin Amis, "Koba, The Dread"

b. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)



2. When the Soviet Union fell, many fellow travelers migrated to the environmental movement. So much so, that the movement is often referred to as the ‘Watermelon Movement:" green on the outside, red on the inside.

a. It is no accident that April 22, Earth Day, is also the birth date of Vladimir Lenin, an acolyte of Karl Marx, the lunatic who invented communism as an alternative to capitalism. Earth Day is naked communism. To begin, it substitutes a worship of the Earth, Gaia, for the worship of God, creator of the universe and the instructor of moral behavior for mankind. The Earth does not demand a moral code of personal behavior. While America was established to ensure “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, environmentalism exists to exert more and more control over our lives by limiting our choices, our liberty.
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day
http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2010/04/naked-communism-of-earth-day.html



3. Communism is international socialism. And so is the United Nations: it was the brain-child of Joseph Stalin. He used his influence over Franklin Roosevelt, and his spy, Alger Hiss to set it in motion.

"A young American diplomat wasthe leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminaryplanning for the U.N.was done.

He wasRoosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn(Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later).

At Yalta it was agreed that theSoviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one.At Yalta much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, andStalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N.for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.

All of this seemed well and good until three years later.Alger Hisswas exposed as a communist spy...."
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know



And the force behind Global Warming today? The United Nations.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Guilty for winning that Nobel Prize despite not actually doing anything. Trying to actually earn it now.

 

[Wildman]

The United Nations.

is controlled by commies and run by the most insignificant countries on this Earth. and the U.S.A. pays the bills and gives and gives and gives.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Guilty for winning that Nobel Prize despite not actually doing anything. Trying to actually earn it now.

One can get so very much more out of post then by simply reading a title.
Have you heard that before?

 

[Rozman]

Big time Democrat donors invested in green energy tech....
So Obama needs to keep pushing the we are killing the planet theme......

As is often said....
Follow the money..

 

[Redfish]

Big time Democrat donors invested in green energy tech....
So Obama needs to keep pushing the we are killing the planet theme......

As is often said....
Follow the money..

true, its also a way for liberals to control behavior that they don't like. Like keeping your thermostat at 72 rather than 78 as they dictate. Remember, liberals think they know how you should live better than you do.

 

[Oldstyle]

Guilty for winning that Nobel Prize despite not actually doing anything. Trying to actually earn it now.

Ah, he won a Nobel Peace Prize...how does global warming fit into that category?

Barack Obama is doing climate change because he's awful at growing the economy, his foreign policy is a disaster and he's created more black vs. white conflict than any President in modern history. What else is left?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Big time Democrat donors invested in green energy tech....
So Obama needs to keep pushing the we are killing the planet theme......

As is often said....
Follow the money..

Well....since 'green energy technology' is rife with bankruptcy, failure, and high costs for energy, I'll stick with the idea that Obama's pretense is merely a kick-back scheme to have the donors given taxpayer funds.

Global warming is the extension of Karl Marx's plans for global dominance.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Students of geo-political history know why.
Here, the prologue to this story:


1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic.

The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government.
The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’
Which actually advances the greater good?


a. "Collectivization (1929-33) was the opening and defining phase of Stalin's untrammelled power: it was the first thing he did the moment his hands were free. As a crime against humanity it eclipses the Great Terror,...During Collectivization Stalin is reckoned to have killed about 4 million children. For the man himself, though, and for the man's psychology, the most salient feature of Collectivization was the abysmal depth, and gigantic reach, of its failure.....
Martin Amis, "Koba, The Dread"

b. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)



2. When the Soviet Union fell, many fellow travelers migrated to the environmental movement. So much so, that the movement is often referred to as the ‘Watermelon Movement:" green on the outside, red on the inside.

a. It is no accident that April 22, Earth Day, is also the birth date of Vladimir Lenin, an acolyte of Karl Marx, the lunatic who invented communism as an alternative to capitalism. Earth Day is naked communism. To begin, it substitutes a worship of the Earth, Gaia, for the worship of God, creator of the universe and the instructor of moral behavior for mankind. The Earth does not demand a moral code of personal behavior. While America was established to ensure “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, environmentalism exists to exert more and more control over our lives by limiting our choices, our liberty.
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day



3. Communism is international socialism. And so is the United Nations: it was the brain-child of Joseph Stalin. He used his influence over Franklin Roosevelt, and his spy, Alger Hiss to set it in motion.

"A young American diplomat wasthe leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminaryplanning for the U.N.was done.

He wasRoosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn(Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later).

At Yalta it was agreed that theSoviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one.At Yalta much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, andStalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N.for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.

All of this seemed well and good until three years later.Alger Hisswas exposed as a communist spy...."
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know



And the force behind Global Warming today? The United Nations.

Actually, the people behind the creation of the United Nations were working for the Jesuit General and fulfilling his plan, just as the Jesuit General chose and planted the people who were behind the formation of the League of Nations, P.C. . In fact, the man behind the League of Nations (a Jesuit - not a priest - 92% of them aren't) impressed the Queen so much that she said he was the most brilliant of men she had ever met (not exact words - but along those lines). Of course he was brilliant. He was a Jesuit, just like this pope that speaks so vaguely you could drive a mac truck through most of what he says is- it's done intentionally.

This same Jesuit who was the mastermind behind the first U.N. (League of Nations) wrote a book entitled, "The Holy Roman Empire." As is usually the case, his arrogance and pride could not be contained and by writing such a book it becomes very clear who he was working for with the failed U.N. (League of Nations). In fact, the nations that joined - dropped out because they saw the writing on the wall - sanctions, etc. and feared they had too much power. As is always the case with the Vatican, what they fail at once they will try again for. So although they didn't achieve their One World Order through Hitler (that was the plan - Hitler was a Catholic working for their dream, not his) or their League Nations (League of Nations came before WWII - the UN came after - they did try and try again until they accomplished their goal through the UN which is their own personal front organization. Who would ever have guessed? And this is why you see Pope Francis pushing their agendas (Climate Change), disarming America (UN agenda), a One World religion (with him at the helm) and Shimone Perez (a Jesuit Jew Israeli) suggesting that Pope Francis is the man who should be appointed as the head and decision maker over all religions - with unquestionable authority. Of course. Why shouldn't he be the head when the UN belonged to the Jesuit General from day one and was his own invention?

Anyone in the Roman Catholic church should realize that behind the wars, on both sides, the results of wars - such as refugees flooding Syria - is the UN and behind the UN is the Black Pope - Jesuit General - and his Jesuit Army and the White Pope - playing the good guy role. It's the ultimate evil. If any desire to get to heaven and are in the RCC? They need to get out immediately. There is no salvation in the Roman Catholic Institution. It's a Crime Syndicate and Satan is their Boss.

Jesuit mastermind behind League of Nations - The First United Nations that failed -
Lord Bryce:

Photo of Lord Bryce - Jesuit Mastermind of UN (1st and 2nd)
Agent of Jesuit General and Roman Vatican
Author of Holy Roman Empire
Master deceiver, genius mind, Servant of Satan
Deceived entire nations and world leaders- at the behest of the Vatican.

James Bryce, 1st Viscount Bryce - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ambassador to the United States[edit]

Bryce (left) with Andrew Carnegie
However, even this time, Bryce's cabinet post was held only for a brief period because as soon as February 1907, he was appointedBritish Ambassador to the United States of America.[11] He kept this diplomatic office until 1913 and was very efficient in strengthening the Anglo-American friendship. Bryce made many personal friends in American politics such as US President Theodore Roosevelt.[citation needed] The German ambassador in Washington, Graf Heinrich von Bernstorff, later admitted how relieved he felt that Bryce was not his competitor for American sympathies during the World War period even though Bernstorff managed to keep the US from declaring war until 1917.[citation needed]


Robert Baden-Powell, William Taft and James Bryce at the White House in 1912
As an author, Bryce quickly became well known in America for his 1888 work, The American Commonwealth. The book thoroughly examined the institutions of the United States from the point of view of a historian and constitutional lawyer and at once became a classic. In developing material for his book, Bryce painstakingly reproduced the travels of Alexis de Tocqueville, who wrote Democracy in America(1835–40). Although Tocqueville emphasized the egalitarian nature of early-19th-century America, Bryce was dismayed to find vast inequality: "Sixty years ago, there were no great fortunes in America, few large fortunes, no poverty. Now there is some poverty... and a greater number of gigantic fortunes than in any other country of the world"[12] and "As respects education... the profusion of…elementary schools tends to raise the mass to a higher point than in Europe... [but] there is an increasing class that has studied at the best universities. It appears that equality has diminished [in this regard] and will diminish further."[13] The work was heavily used in academia as a result of Bryce's close friendships with men such as President James B. Angell of the University of Michigan and successively Charles W. Eliot and Abbott Lawrence Lowell at Harvard.[14] Against the backdrop of the New Immigration of the late nineteenth century, the work also became a key medium for popularising the view of American history as distinctly Anglo-Saxon, comparable with similarly exceptionalist "Whig" histories written in late Victorian Britain.[15]
__________________
It is very difficult for the average person to believe the truth that is right in front of them because when Satan uses religion and concerns such as environment, the good of the people, altruism......when he comes as an "angel of light" (Pope, Vatican, Catholicism) the people are blinded to the truth. RCC is the Church of Satan which is why Rome Vatican is identified as his headquarters in Book of Revelation.

The truth is the truth and by the time some believe it - it will be too late. Interesting that the Jesuit General sent in a "Diplomat" to the USA the second time - again. I guess they figured what worked the first time would work the second. The truth is the mastermind Jesuit working for Rome today is Henry Kissinger. He's been working for them all along. Just as Shimone Perez has.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

.....It is no accident that April 22, Earth Day, is also the birth date of Vladimir Lenin,...

Interesting, I didn't know that part of the theory yet

 

[imawhosure]

Big time Democrat donors invested in green energy tech....
So Obama needs to keep pushing the we are killing the planet theme......

As is often said....
Follow the money..

Well....since 'green energy technology' is rife with bankruptcy, failure, and high costs for energy, I'll stick with the idea that Obama's pretense is merely a kick-back scheme to have the donors given taxpayer funds.

Global warming is the extension of Karl Marx's plans for global dominance.

PC, your thread starter on the "watermelon movement" was excellent. We need more ties between radical enviros and Communists. Find more of these little gems like Hiss, and we will have enviros running for the exits for sure-)

 

[Freewill]

Obama is all over GW because it is easy. No real proof needed. No tangible evidence that everyone can see. Nothing but the word of those who have a vested interested promoting GW hysteria. It is not like Obama gives a crap if American's lose their jobs, he'll just import more to replace them????

 

[konradv]

Students of geo-political history know why. Here, the prologue to this story:
1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic. The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government. The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’ Which actually advances the greater good?

IMO, your analysis falls flat on this first point. The SU only cared about breakneck development, NOT the environment. They were one of the world's worst offenders, when it came to environmental pollution. Russia and the other states of the former SU are still cleaning up that legacy.

 

[Theowl32]

Students of geo-political history know why.
Here, the prologue to this story:


1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic.

The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government.
The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’
Which actually advances the greater good?


a. "Collectivization (1929-33) was the opening and defining phase of Stalin's untrammelled power: it was the first thing he did the moment his hands were free. As a crime against humanity it eclipses the Great Terror,...During Collectivization Stalin is reckoned to have killed about 4 million children. For the man himself, though, and for the man's psychology, the most salient feature of Collectivization was the abysmal depth, and gigantic reach, of its failure.....
Martin Amis, "Koba, The Dread"

b. "...the State 'has the supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State... for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.'" Author/historian William Shirer, quoting Georg Hegel in his The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (1959, page 144)



2. When the Soviet Union fell, many fellow travelers migrated to the environmental movement. So much so, that the movement is often referred to as the ‘Watermelon Movement:" green on the outside, red on the inside.

a. It is no accident that April 22, Earth Day, is also the birth date of Vladimir Lenin, an acolyte of Karl Marx, the lunatic who invented communism as an alternative to capitalism. Earth Day is naked communism. To begin, it substitutes a worship of the Earth, Gaia, for the worship of God, creator of the universe and the instructor of moral behavior for mankind. The Earth does not demand a moral code of personal behavior. While America was established to ensure “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, environmentalism exists to exert more and more control over our lives by limiting our choices, our liberty.
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day



3. Communism is international socialism. And so is the United Nations: it was the brain-child of Joseph Stalin. He used his influence over Franklin Roosevelt, and his spy, Alger Hiss to set it in motion.

"A young American diplomat wasthe leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminaryplanning for the U.N.was done.

He wasRoosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn(Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later).

At Yalta it was agreed that theSoviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one.At Yalta much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, andStalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N.for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.

All of this seemed well and good until three years later.Alger Hisswas exposed as a communist spy...."
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know
What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know



And the force behind Global Warming today? The United Nations.

It is a world movement. Yes, the first red flag was the world community awarding this sack of brown shit in the white house the nobel peace prize before ever taking office.

It is about pushing the world into ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT which is the goal. The liars call it socialism. The morons who follow it call it utopia. It is all the same caste system that dominated the world for many many centuries.

Rich class, and everyone else. Everyone else, being the poor class. No more middle class. No opportunity for the poor to ever get out of their situation.

The only chance for any poor person to get out of their situation is opportunity. With out that, there is not possibility. Want me to list the number of poor people who benefited from those opportunities that the free market provided for them? I will be happy to provide that list. Including Oprah, who typically now is against the free market that provided her with the opportunity that she was given.

Boy, that America must be racist and sexist. What, is oprah a white man?

Oh never mind. They will fall back on all of the cliches of the world community. Climate scams, racial division, gender division all for class division. That, is the movement we are all witnessing. The world leaders want to destroy the free market cause they despise the middle class and they hate the notion that a poor person can reach their status in life.

 

[imawhosure]

Students of geo-political history know why. Here, the prologue to this story:
1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic. The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government. The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’ Which actually advances the greater good?

IMO, your analysis falls flat on this first point. The SU only cared about breakneck development, NOT the environment. They were one of the world's worst offenders, when it came to environmental pollution. Russia and the other states of the former SU are still cleaning up that legacy.

So out of all of that, you came up with that one complaint. We can accept that!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Students of geo-political history know why. Here, the prologue to this story:
1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic. The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government. The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’ Which actually advances the greater good?

IMO, your analysis falls flat on this first point. The SU only cared about breakneck development, NOT the environment. They were one of the world's worst offenders, when it came to environmental pollution. Russia and the other states of the former SU are still cleaning up that legacy.

Are you serious???

You actually read my posts and imagine that I was saying that the communists were about saving the environment??????

Are you that stupid?


They were about revolution to abolish capitalism.
That's all.
Power.
And death to any who stand in their way.

 

[konradv]

Big time Democrat donors invested in green energy tech. So Obama needs to keep pushing the we are killing the planet theme. As is often said. Follow the money.

It's funny how the denialists will invoke "follow the money" when they're talking about scientists working on relatively paltry government grants, but completely ignore the lavish amounts of money spent by opponents of AGW. Real scientists actually have to do experiments and publish papers. Denialist flacks only have to cast aspersions on those who do, for many times the money.

 

[konradv]

So out of all of that, you came up with that one complaint. We can accept that!

It was the first point. A fish stinks from the head.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Students of geo-political history know why. Here, the prologue to this story:
1. In the Iron Curtain countries, where there were no constitutional democracies and no private property rights, the central planning ethic could be fully realized; the results have been shown to be catastrophic. The principles of the American republic produced prosperity based on private property and individualism, and constitutional restrictions on the power of the government. The principles behind both environmentalism, and of the former Soviet Union are based on ending private property rights, and making the collective all powerful, what Robespierre would call ‘the general will.’ Which actually advances the greater good?

IMO, your analysis falls flat on this first point. The SU only cared about breakneck development, NOT the environment. They were one of the world's worst offenders, when it came to environmental pollution. Russia and the other states of the former SU are still cleaning up that legacy.

You didn't understand it, she's didn't say the USSR were environmentalists, they were wanted total control and with ObamaCare and AGWCult they'll get total control over the US economy and people

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Big time Democrat donors invested in green energy tech. So Obama needs to keep pushing the we are killing the planet theme. As is often said. Follow the money.

It's funny how the denialists will invoke "follow the money" when they're talking about scientists working on relatively paltry government grants, but completely ignore the lavish amounts of money spent by opponents of AGW. Real scientists actually have to do experiments and publish papers. Denialist flacks only have to cast aspersions on those who do, for many times the money.

Denier is a cult word, it's the secret handshake word used to identify members of the AGWCult, no real scientist ever uses it