Why is the far left so upset that a 17 year old Patriot shoot arsonists and looters?

[progressive hunter]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

still no link,,,,

 

[Dagosa]

It is a misdemeanor to carrying a rifle as a minor unless you are huntin

A misdemeanor is not a capital offense, but it’s still a crime. In the commission of a crime, you are immediately illegal.
For example, speeding more then 30 mph over the limit in many states is a misdemeanor too. If you are then involved in an incident while doing it that results in someone’s death, your ass is grass.
so don’t think misdemeanors are not crimes.

so is running a stop sign,,,but none of it means he cant defend himself when being attacked,,,

If running the stop sign contributes to you‘re being involved in an incedent where you kill someone, you’re in big trouble. You are not reading the law. He has contributed to the situation.

 

[progressive hunter]

It is a misdemeanor to carrying a rifle as a minor unless you are huntin

A misdemeanor is not a capital offense, but it’s still a crime. In the commission of a crime, you are immediately illegal.
For example, speeding more then 30 mph over the limit in many states is a misdemeanor too. If you are then involved in an incident while doing it that results in someone’s death, your ass is grass.
so don’t think misdemeanors are not crimes.

so is running a stop sign,,,but none of it means he cant defend himself when being attacked,,,

If running the stop sign contributes to you‘re being involved in an incedent where you kill someone, you’re in big trouble. You are not reading the law. He has contributed to the situation.

still no link,,,,

 

[Dagosa]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

still no link,,,,

And none by you.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is an eye witness to the events. A reporter named Ritchie McGinnis who made his own video. His account differs substantially from the fabrications of communist internet posters. What does he know?

This case is going to go away.

 

[Jitss617]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

that has yet to be determined and doesnt take away the fact he was defending himself against many attackers,,
so lucky for him he was armed or he would be dead,,,

Nope. He and/or his buddies initiated the incident before he was personally attacked. He was seen running away after shots were fired by group he was with. He was there illegally carrying an illegal weapon. Everything he did, contributed to the ultimate homicide. It’s no different then a group going after some else in the process of committing a crime. Are you going to say it’s ok for a convicted felon who was seen firing his weapon, to then shoot to defend himself when he tried to escape ?

How did he initiate the attack lol

 

[Dagosa]

He has to be the worst white supremacist of all time. He only shot white people and he offered medical aid to black protestors during the rioting.

Ahhhhhh

The narrative

He’s an idiot First and likely to do anything stupid, most white supremest are to begin with.

 

[progressive hunter]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

still no link,,,,

And none by you.

its been well posted,,,

 

[Jitss617]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

Yes he was involved in a shooting where he got tired of running and having objects thrown at him and guns shot in the air. That’s called self defense

 

[Dagosa]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

that has yet to be determined and doesnt take away the fact he was defending himself against many attackers,,
so lucky for him he was armed or he would be dead,,,

Nope. He and/or his buddies initiated the incident before he was personally attacked. He was seen running away after shots were fired by group he was with. He was there illegally carrying an illegal weapon. Everything he did, contributed to the ultimate homicide. It’s no different then a group going after some else in the process of committing a crime. Are you going to say it’s ok for a convicted felon who was seen firing his weapon, to then shoot to defend himself when he tried to escape ?

How did he initiate the attack lol

If he had obeyed the law. THIS would never have happened .

 

[Dagosa]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

still no link,,,,

And none by you.

its been well posted,,,

In other words, you have NO LINK.

 

[progressive hunter]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

that has yet to be determined and doesnt take away the fact he was defending himself against many attackers,,
so lucky for him he was armed or he would be dead,,,

Nope. He and/or his buddies initiated the incident before he was personally attacked. He was seen running away after shots were fired by group he was with. He was there illegally carrying an illegal weapon. Everything he did, contributed to the ultimate homicide. It’s no different then a group going after some else in the process of committing a crime. Are you going to say it’s ok for a convicted felon who was seen firing his weapon, to then shoot to defend himself when he tried to escape ?

How did he initiate the attack lol

If he had obeyed the law. THIS would never have happened .

the 2nd amendment doesnt have an age limit,,,

 

[Jitss617]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

that has yet to be determined and doesnt take away the fact he was defending himself against many attackers,,
so lucky for him he was armed or he would be dead,,,

Nope. He and/or his buddies initiated the incident before he was personally attacked. He was seen running away after shots were fired by group he was with. He was there illegally carrying an illegal weapon. Everything he did, contributed to the ultimate homicide. It’s no different then a group going after some else in the process of committing a crime. Are you going to say it’s ok for a convicted felon who was seen firing his weapon, to then shoot to defend himself when he tried to escape ?

How did he initiate the attack lol

If he had obeyed the law. THIS would never have happened .

And if democrats protected businesses and citizens from mob violence he wouldn’t have been named patriot of the century

 

[progressive hunter]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

still no link,,,,

And none by you.

its been well posted,,,

In other words, you have NO LINK.

I posted one this morning,,
you should educate yourself before opening your mouth

 

[Theowl32]

He has to be the worst white supremacist of all time. He only shot white people and he offered medical aid to black protestors during the rioting.

Ahhhhhh

The narrative

He’s an idiot First and likely to do anything stupid, most white supremest are to begin with.

Illiterate person calling someone stupid. Love it.

 

[Slade3200]

The Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha and Guardian of Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, will be acquitted by a Jury of his Peers, the townsfolk of Kenosha who have suffered immense harm by the hands of Rioters, Rapists, Arsonists, Looters and Thugs.

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

We’re the people that he killed looting and rioting? I haven’t heard. What exactly were they doing?

Setting fire to businesses. Specifically a car dealership.

The case against this kid is falling apart. He did nothing wrong. It's amazing the amount of tripe that's being made up about him.

You’re saying that two guys where setting fire to car dealerships and the kid shot them?

 

[Dagosa]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

Yes he was involved in a shooting where he got tired of running and having objects thrown at him and guns shot in the air. That’s called self defense

Pretty poor defense when you have already admitted he was in the act of committing a crime.

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

that has yet to be determined and doesnt take away the fact he was defending himself against many attackers,,
so lucky for him he was armed or he would be dead,,,

Nope. He and/or his buddies initiated the incident before he was personally attacked. He was seen running away after shots were fired by group he was with. He was there illegally carrying an illegal weapon. Everything he did, contributed to the ultimate homicide. It’s no different then a group going after some else in the process of committing a crime. Are you going to say it’s ok for a convicted felon who was seen firing his weapon, to then shoot to defend himself when he tried to escape ?

How did he initiate the attack lol

If he had obeyed the law. THIS would never have happened .

the 2nd amendment doesnt have an age limit,,,

You don’t know much about the constitution do you. That proves proves it.
The two A doesn’t say anything about convicted felons being unqualified either. So, your argument means the 2a allows ANYONE the right to Carry a firearm...5 year olds, murderers, terriorist, lunatics. It doesn’t

 

[progressive hunter]

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

There was nothing threatening at all how he handled the rifle he handled it the proper way he held it down until it was necessary to hold up. And he has a statutory right of common law of self-defense there’s nothing you can do about that all the video shows him being chased by a mob being attacked being hit with a skateboard having a gun pulled on him at point-blank range.. he’s going to be released and he’s going to be a billionaire after he sues everybody.. lol

Wrong, he was running away because he ir the group he was in, had already fired a weapon and shot at some one ALREADY. He was being chased because he was an illegal gun carrier involved in a shooting .
Now quibble about his self defense rights.

Yes he was involved in a shooting where he got tired of running and having objects thrown at him and guns shot in the air. That’s called self defense

Pretty poor defense when you have already admitted he was in the act of committing a crime.

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

This is from the police report
In the first case, a man had allegedly pursued him, thrown an object at him, and attempted to seize his weapon. In the second case, several people had allegedly chased him; one had allegedly struck him with a skateboard; and another had allegedly approached him with a firearm.
First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm he was prohibited from carrying. Weren’t backing in self defense when they tried to disarm him.

He has common law statutory right to self-defense

First, you’re going to have answer the argument that why an illegal gun carrier underaged kid who threatened others with a firearm, is legal to kill two,people who acted in self defense when they tried to disarm him. he was open carrying an assault weapon and threatening

This kid is going to be so rich

He’s going to need it too, along with a pardon from Trump the idiot.

Why what did he do wrong

He’s underaged.

Oh it’s a misdemeanor lol

He is probably a murderer.

I don’t think murder one is in the books. Maybe manslaughter.

I'm sorry, you sound a little lost. My post was in reply to simply "why the far left would be upset with a 17yr old kid for shooting looters and arsonists".

It ridiculous to put it that simply. No, you don’t allow under age kids to shoot people in their judgement are looters.

he shot them because they were attacking him not because they were looters,,,

do try and keep up with the facts,,,

Try to keep up with the real facts. This 17 year old was in the process of committing a crime. He was the criminal.

that has yet to be determined and doesnt take away the fact he was defending himself against many attackers,,
so lucky for him he was armed or he would be dead,,,

Nope. He and/or his buddies initiated the incident before he was personally attacked. He was seen running away after shots were fired by group he was with. He was there illegally carrying an illegal weapon. Everything he did, contributed to the ultimate homicide. It’s no different then a group going after some else in the process of committing a crime. Are you going to say it’s ok for a convicted felon who was seen firing his weapon, to then shoot to defend himself when he tried to escape ?

How did he initiate the attack lol

If he had obeyed the law. THIS would never have happened .

the 2nd amendment doesnt have an age limit,,,

you don’t know much do you. That pist proves it.

wheres your link???
I posted mine,,,

 

[BothWings]

We should see what happens with the case. Many times the legal system backs people up who defend themselves like this. The left likes to hang out in media rooms, virtual or real, shaming anyone who does so. They put people in the position of hesitation to defend their own rights and as a result they are wronged or hurt by it. The best thing to deal with the extreme left is to simply not become concerned about what they think. That's what their constant diarrhea of random outrage is all about.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha and Guardian of Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, will be acquitted by a Jury of his Peers, the townsfolk of Kenosha who have suffered immense harm by the hands of Rioters, Rapists, Arsonists, Looters and Thugs.

Two nights ago, the Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha, and Guardian of the Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, suppressed an unlawful riot in Kenosha where countless businesses have been burnt down, looted and forced out of business.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The police were no where to be found, unable to act and carry out their function of maintaining Law and Order.

So the citizens of the area took up arms, exercising their Second Amendment right to suppress violent riot, arson and looting and to suppress a communist insurrection.

It's almost as if the far left wants to take our Second Amendment rights so they can abolish the police and then rain chaos upon our communities (problem, reaction...solution?), and then institute their new police force under the flag of communism to restore civilization.

We’re the people that he killed looting and rioting? I haven’t heard. What exactly were they doing?

Setting fire to businesses. Specifically a car dealership.

The case against this kid is falling apart. He did nothing wrong. It's amazing the amount of tripe that's being made up about him.

You’re saying that two guys where setting fire to car dealerships and the kid shot them?

Three guys were setting fire to car dealerships when they saw Rittenhouse and decided to attack him. Likely as an identifying witness. The kid was asked by the dealership owner to go to the dealership and see what was going on.

If you have seen videos of the shooting there is a man seen taking off his tshirt to use on the injured arsonist. That man is reporter Ritchie McGinnis who saw the entire thing from beginning to end and has his own films. He's been telling his story everywhere.