Why is the government covering up the poor building of the collapsed condo in Florida? The part left standing was the evidence

[SavannahMann]

And the part left standing without the right reinforcements was just detonated and destroyed even before the bodies were all recovered. So a coverup is clear and the government is responsible in some way. So why was the evidence just destroyed? Who is the government protecting? Can these Florida condos be destroyed by lighting sparklers at the base? Worse than this no one in the media or lawyer is asking this question.

Rusted reinforced concrete did it. Florida has salty air, hmm.

90 percent of the population of the world lives near the coast. Nothing like this collapse has ever happened before, unless explosives were involved. So even if you were correct which you are not the standing part of the building should have been studied even if only to better building standards, yet the building was detonated on top of not yet recovered bodies. So again what is the government covering up

Alcatraz. Game. Set Match.

 

[Dusty]

And the part left standing without the right reinforcements was just detonated and destroyed even before the bodies were all recovered. So a coverup is clear and the government is responsible in some way. So why was the evidence just destroyed? Who is the government protecting? Can these Florida condos be destroyed by lighting sparklers at the base? Worse than this no one in the media or lawyer is asking this question.

Rusted reinforced concrete did it. Florida has salty air, hmm.

90 percent of the population of the world lives near the coast. Nothing like this collapse has ever happened before, unless explosives were involved. So even if you were correct which you are not the standing part of the building should have been studied even if only to better building standards, yet the building was detonated on top of not yet recovered bodies. So again what is the government covering up

That's what the Florida Engineer said. Ancient Romans made concrete set hard under saltwater.

Ancient Roman concrete is much different and more durable than modern concrete.

Exposure to seawater just made it even stronger over the years.

But the same seawater weakens modern concrete. LOL eat your bacon jihad

 

[Muhammed]

And the part left standing without the right reinforcements was just detonated and destroyed even before the bodies were all recovered. So a coverup is clear and the government is responsible in some way. So why was the evidence just destroyed? Who is the government protecting? Can these Florida condos be destroyed by lighting sparklers at the base? Worse than this no one in the media or lawyer is asking this question.

Rusted reinforced concrete did it. Florida has salty air, hmm.

90 percent of the population of the world lives near the coast. Nothing like this collapse has ever happened before, unless explosives were involved. So even if you were correct which you are not the standing part of the building should have been studied even if only to better building standards, yet the building was detonated on top of not yet recovered bodies. So again what is the government covering up

That's what the Florida Engineer said. Ancient Romans made concrete set hard under saltwater.

Ancient Roman concrete is much different and more durable than modern concrete.

Exposure to seawater just made it even stronger over the years.

But the same seawater weakens modern concrete.

Yes, it deteriorates it. I'm in the concrete business. I've studied this stuff for decades and have a very deep understanding of the science involved.

But you don't have to be a concrete expert like me to know that seawater deteriorates modern concrete, all you need is common sense, which you lack.

Ancient Roman concrete seawalls have lasted over 2000 years, while modern concrete seawalls only last mere decades.