Why is Trump such a Coward?

[Wyatt earp]

What does this have to do with your thread?


.

I was obviously responding to a poster since you pussies couldn't address the op..
Besides YOU derailed it talking about Paris. You're not very good at this are you. You need a new hobby.

The entire topic was about Paris accord you fucking idiot..
..

Ignoramus can't read. It's about Tramp's personal views on GW.
As Reagan use to say before he became senile like you.. " There you go again." Making a damn fool of yourself..

I never saw a poster act like such a bitch...you don't have a clue what the Paris accord was about do you?
.

My bitch is back looking for more abuse. You a masochist?

It's obvious now you are a triggly puff.

 

[tycho1572]

It's been since 2015 Trump has publicly stated his opinion on global warming.
" It's a hoax."
Since he became president he's petrified to state his view on this subject.
Why is he such a coward?
Scott Pruitt was on the George Stephanopoulos show this morning and he asked Pruitt what's the president's view on GW is. "Does he still think it's a hoax?"
Pruitt dodged the question 4 times.
4 times.
He's supposed to serve the people and won't tell us what the POTUS' view on global warming is. He works for US and won't answer important questions.
We know what Pruit's view is... he also think it's a hoax and sued the EPA 19 times over clean air and clean water.
And Trump hired this guy.
That's like putting Al Capone in charge of law enforcement.

EPA head Scott Pruitt defends Paris exit

Everything will be ok, snowflake.

 

[Wyatt earp]

another example of Tramp being a coward.
Talked forever about Mexico paying for the wall and when he went to Mexico and stood beside the Mexican president, pissed his pants and choked by not mentioning it.
Ha.

This thread has nothing to do with Mexico..


Nothing to do with
Paris


Everything to do with you can't get more money..from the government


Correct?

Tramp is a coward and I proved that too, bitch..

I never met a real life triggly puff can I get your autograph?


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

2. By a more than 5 to 1 margin, voters say the U.S. should participate in the Paris Agreement.
In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement, compared with only 13% who say the U.S. should not. Majorities of Democrats (86%) and Independents (61%), and half of Republicans (51%) say the U.S. should participate (including 73% of moderate/liberal Republicans). Only conservative Republicans are split, with marginally more saying the U.S. should participate (40%) than saying we should not participate (34%).

We didn't frighten you away did we triggly puff?

 

[PredFan]

It's been since 2015 Trump has publicly stated his opinion on global warming.
" It's a hoax."
Since he became president he's petrified to state his view on this subject.
Why is he such a coward?
Scott Pruitt was on the George Stephanopoulos show this morning and he asked Pruitt what's the president's view on GW is. "Does he still think it's a hoax?"
Pruitt dodged the question 4 times.
4 times.
He's supposed to serve the people and won't tell us what the POTUS' view on global warming is. He works for US and won't answer important questions.
We know what Pruit's view is... he also think it's a hoax and sued the EPA 19 times over clean air and clean water.
And Trump hired this guy.
That's like putting Al Capone in charge of law enforcement.

EPA head Scott Pruitt defends Paris exit

He isn't a coward, you are an idiot and a liar, end of thread.

 

[Reasonable]

It's been since 2015 Trump has publicly stated his opinion on global warming.
" It's a hoax."
Since he became president he's petrified to state his view on this subject.
Why is he such a coward?
Scott Pruitt was on the George Stephanopoulos show this morning and he asked Pruitt what's the president's view on GW is. "Does he still think it's a hoax?"
Pruitt dodged the question 4 times.
4 times.
He's supposed to serve the people and won't tell us what the POTUS' view on global warming is. He works for US and won't answer important questions.
We know what Pruit's view is... he also think it's a hoax and sued the EPA 19 times over clean air and clean water.
And Trump hired this guy.
That's like putting Al Capone in charge of law enforcement.

EPA head Scott Pruitt defends Paris exit

Everything will be ok, snowflake.

Not for YOUR serial sex offender. This week will be his week from hell.

 

[Reasonable]

It's been since 2015 Trump has publicly stated his opinion on global warming.
" It's a hoax."
Since he became president he's petrified to state his view on this subject.
Why is he such a coward?
Scott Pruitt was on the George Stephanopoulos show this morning and he asked Pruitt what's the president's view on GW is. "Does he still think it's a hoax?"
Pruitt dodged the question 4 times.
4 times.
He's supposed to serve the people and won't tell us what the POTUS' view on global warming is. He works for US and won't answer important questions.
We know what Pruit's view is... he also think it's a hoax and sued the EPA 19 times over clean air and clean water.
And Trump hired this guy.
That's like putting Al Capone in charge of law enforcement.

EPA head Scott Pruitt defends Paris exit

He isn't a coward, you are an idiot and a liar, end of thread.

Why didn't the coward tell the Mexican president he's paying for the wall?
He's a coward..

 

[Reasonable]

While Trump Slams London Mayor, Other World Leaders Send Support | HuffPost

And looks like a idiot on the world stage..

 

[Iceweasel]

Depolorables to planet earth:,FUCK YOU.

All because they need to follow the pathological liar..

I don't follow Obama, sorry.

 

[Iceweasel]

While Trump Slams London Mayor, Other World Leaders Send Support | HuffPost

And looks like a idiot on the world stage..

I'm not visiting the trash site but if you are talking about Europe they are having massive problems. They can offer each other condolences. I'd rather do something like get the travel ban going.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

2. By a more than 5 to 1 margin, voters say the U.S. should participate in the Paris Agreement.
In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement, compared with only 13% who say the U.S. should not. Majorities of Democrats (86%) and Independents (61%), and half of Republicans (51%) say the U.S. should participate (including 73% of moderate/liberal Republicans). Only conservative Republicans are split, with marginally more saying the U.S. should participate (40%) than saying we should not participate (34%).

In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement,

Obama should have sent such a popular agreement to the Senate to be ratified.
Why didn't he?

 

[Reasonable]

2. By a more than 5 to 1 margin, voters say the U.S. should participate in the Paris Agreement.
In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement, compared with only 13% who say the U.S. should not. Majorities of Democrats (86%) and Independents (61%), and half of Republicans (51%) say the U.S. should participate (including 73% of moderate/liberal Republicans). Only conservative Republicans are split, with marginally more saying the U.S. should participate (40%) than saying we should not participate (34%).

In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement,

Obama should have sent such a popular agreement to the Senate to be ratified.
Why didn't he?

The global warming denying GOP senate? Surely you jest.

 

[JonKoch]

His views om climate change are evolving.

I'll give you a hint.

To Obama, climate was the most pressing issue facing humanity, except for these two years 2010-2012


obama silence climate 2010 2012 - Google Search


WHAT was the REAL REASON that caused O to stay silent for TWO YEARS???

Was it an FBI FRAUD case against the "warmers?"


?????????????


Is that part of the reason why the Left is so obsessed with impeachment over nothing immediately???

LMFAO!!!

March 2009 meeting at the Old Executive Office Building, the White House informed the leading environmental groups that it had decided climate change was not a winning message. The blunt headline:

Revealed: the day Obama chose a strategy of silence on climate change
Betsy Taylor, president of Breakthrough Strategies and Solutions, was at the meeting:

“What was communicated in the presentation was: ‘This is what you talk about, and don’t talk about climate change’.” Taylor said. “I took away an absolutely clear understanding that we should focus on clean energy jobs and the potential of a clean energy economy rather than the threat of climate change.”The message stuck. Subsequent campaigns from the Obama administration and some environmental groups relegated climate change to a second-tier concern.


Most (but not all) environmental groups either agreed with the conclusion or felt they were not in a position to do go against the White House strategy:

“When the White House invites you to a meeting and says: ‘here is how we are going to talk about these things’, it sends a very clear message,” said Erich Pica, president of the US Friends of the Earth Action, who was also at the meeting.Now with Obama fighting for re-election, and the climate agenda stalled and under constant attack from Republicans and industry, environmental groups acknowledge the go-softly strategy was a mistake.


The Sounds Of Silence: Team Obama Launched The Inane Strategy Of Downplaying Climate Change Back In March 2009

 

[JonKoch]

2. By a more than 5 to 1 margin, voters say the U.S. should participate in the Paris Agreement.
In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement, compared with only 13% who say the U.S. should not. Majorities of Democrats (86%) and Independents (61%), and half of Republicans (51%) say the U.S. should participate (including 73% of moderate/liberal Republicans). Only conservative Republicans are split, with marginally more saying the U.S. should participate (40%) than saying we should not participate (34%).

In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement,

Obama should have sent such a popular agreement to the Senate to be ratified.
Why didn't he?

COP21 agreement NOT A TREATY


In the Paris Agreement, each country determines, plans and regularly reports its own contribution it should make in order to mitigate global warming. There is no mechanism to force a country to set a specific target by a specific date, but each target should go beyond previously set targets.

The Paris Agreement "provides no consequences if countries do not meet their commitments
Paris Agreement - Wikipedia

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

2. By a more than 5 to 1 margin, voters say the U.S. should participate in the Paris Agreement.
In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement, compared with only 13% who say the U.S. should not. Majorities of Democrats (86%) and Independents (61%), and half of Republicans (51%) say the U.S. should participate (including 73% of moderate/liberal Republicans). Only conservative Republicans are split, with marginally more saying the U.S. should participate (40%) than saying we should not participate (34%).

In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement,

Obama should have sent such a popular agreement to the Senate to be ratified.
Why didn't he?

The global warming denying GOP senate? Surely you jest.

No ratification, no treaty. Simple.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

2. By a more than 5 to 1 margin, voters say the U.S. should participate in the Paris Agreement.
In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement, compared with only 13% who say the U.S. should not. Majorities of Democrats (86%) and Independents (61%), and half of Republicans (51%) say the U.S. should participate (including 73% of moderate/liberal Republicans). Only conservative Republicans are split, with marginally more saying the U.S. should participate (40%) than saying we should not participate (34%).

In a nationally representative survey conducted after the election, we found that seven in ten registered voters (69%) say the U.S. should participate in the COP21 agreement,

Obama should have sent such a popular agreement to the Senate to be ratified.
Why didn't he?

COP21 agreement NOT A TREATY


In the Paris Agreement, each country determines, plans and regularly reports its own contribution it should make in order to mitigate global warming. There is no mechanism to force a country to set a specific target by a specific date, but each target should go beyond previously set targets.

The Paris Agreement "provides no consequences if countries do not meet their commitments
Paris Agreement - Wikipedia

Excellent! No mechanism, no force, no big deal now that we're out.

 

[jc456]

for the speds : Why won't Tramp tell the country what his views are on global warming?

Why is he a coward?

Run away.

trump explained it very clearly. he stated that paying trillions into a green fund won't do anything accept move the wealth. You want his answer on climate, then provide something that is climate related.

 

[mamooth]

No ratification, no treaty. Simple.

But there was ratification.

Ooh, sucks to be you. Now you have to admit there was a treaty, and that the terms of it have to be followed.

What, your cult told you there wasn't? You need to take that up with your cult. Why did they lie to you? Do you care?

If you need a little help, know that the treaty wasn't ratified under Obama.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No ratification, no treaty. Simple.

But there was ratification.

Ooh, sucks to be you. Now you have to admit there was a treaty, and that the terms of it have to be followed.

What, your cult told you there wasn't? You need to take that up with your cult. Why did they lie to you? Do you care?

If you need a little help, know that the treaty wasn't ratified under Obama.

But there was ratification.

Cool. How many votes did it get? Link?

 

[mamooth]

Cool. How many votes did it get? Link?

Treaty Document 102-38 - UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

Not sure how many votes. I can't find that anywhere. Had to have been at least two-thirds. And then H.W. Bush signed the treaty.