Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,454
- 83,076
- 2,635
LOLOLSemantic lying idiot.LOLOLGo back and read post #96.danielpalos didn’t say the decision was narrow, you did.Yes, but the vote was 7-2 in favor, so the decision wasn't narrowIt was narrow in the sense that it applied to a narrow range of cases, in fact to that one specific case as there was explicit misbehavior by the government that showed a strong bias against the baker and his religion, as I recall.
Had to put the weasel words in there so that no one accuses me of lying if I am wrong, lolol.
It still doesn't say it was a narrow "decision." Only you said that.
You poor thing, bless your heart. That still doesn't make anyone here but you saying it was a narrow decision.
![mm :mm: :mm:](/styles/smilies/mm.gif)