Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Lemme guess. You never worked for a company. Amiright?"
Yes I did. Then I started my own.
And when the companies send all the jobs to China to avoid paying a living wage to employees? What then?"Lemme guess. You never worked for a company. Amiright?"
Yes I did. Then I started my own.
Couldn't keep a job.
Good companies cultivate employees, knowing that new hires are expensive and uncertain. Of course employees top out in their skills at some point. A machinist can only be so productive, etc.
But libs look on businesses as some kind of charity and hiring as some kind of hand out. The truth is it is a 2 way street, the employee trading his time and labor for wages and benefits. If it doesnt work for either party, then the relationship should end.
I have no problem with unions and unionism.
1. Covered by freedom of assembly in the Constitution
2. They serve as part of the checks and balances necessary in a market economy
3. If any object to public employee unions, take it up with the corrupt politicians who sign away the public fisc.
And when the companies send all the jobs to China to avoid paying a living wage to employees? What then?"Lemme guess. You never worked for a company. Amiright?"
Yes I did. Then I started my own.
Couldn't keep a job.
Good companies cultivate employees, knowing that new hires are expensive and uncertain. Of course employees top out in their skills at some point. A machinist can only be so productive, etc.
But libs look on businesses as some kind of charity and hiring as some kind of hand out. The truth is it is a 2 way street, the employee trading his time and labor for wages and benefits. If it doesnt work for either party, then the relationship should end.
I have no problem with unions and unionism.
1. Covered by freedom of assembly in the Constitution
2. They serve as part of the checks and balances necessary in a market economy
3. If any object to public employee unions, take it up with the corrupt politicians who sign away the public fisc.
Private sector unions are fine if the workers want them. Public sector unions should be illegal.
_________________________________My dear Mr. Steward:
As I am unable to accept your kind invitation to be present on the occasion of the Twentieth Jubilee Convention of the National Federation of Federal Employees, I am taking this method of sending greetings and a message.
Reading your letter of July 14, 1937, I was especially interested in the timeliness of your remark that the manner in which the activities of your organization have been carried on during the past two decades "has been in complete consonance with the best traditions of public employee relationships." Organizations of Government employees have a logical place in Government affairs.
The desire of Government employees for fair and adequate pay, reasonable hours of work, safe and suitable working conditions, development of opportunities for advancement, facilities for fair and impartial consideration and review of grievances, and other objectives of a proper employee relations policy, is basically no different from that of employees in private industry. Organization on their part to present their views on such matters is both natural and logical, but meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the Government.
All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress. Accordingly, administrative officials and employees alike are governed and guided, and in many instances restricted, by laws which establish policies, procedures, or rules in personnel matters.
Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of Government employees. Upon employees in the Federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people, whose interests and welfare require orderliness and continuity in the conduct of Government activities. This obligation is paramount. Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable. It is, therefore, with a feeling of gratification that I have noted in the constitution of the National Federation of Federal Employees the provision that "under no circumstances shall this Federation engage in or support strikes against the United States Government."
Are you one of these people that thinks companies exist just to dole out jobs?And when the companies send all the jobs to China to avoid paying a living wage to employees? What then?"Lemme guess. You never worked for a company. Amiright?"
Yes I did. Then I started my own.
Couldn't keep a job.
Good companies cultivate employees, knowing that new hires are expensive and uncertain. Of course employees top out in their skills at some point. A machinist can only be so productive, etc.
But libs look on businesses as some kind of charity and hiring as some kind of hand out. The truth is it is a 2 way street, the employee trading his time and labor for wages and benefits. If it doesnt work for either party, then the relationship should end.
Liberals believe companies exist for them and should be told what they are allowed to do or not do. The company isn't some privately owned entity operating in the public space, it is only allowed to exist if it does what they want.
The person or people that own that company are supposed obey the orders of their liberal handlers. Nevermind it is their money and their life on the line with success or failure of the company, liberals want in some of the action just like with unions.
If companies keep raising wages periodically for their workers, the workers increase production. It most always works out this way. You work as hard you are paid for. Higher wages most always equals higher production.
The things that the unions fought for in the past are now required by law. Unions today serve no purpose but to collect money for the democrat party.
Capitalism is founded upon the struggle of management versus those that they have hired. Management has won a huge battle now that unions are becoming a thing of the past. It is now up to the worker to constantly strive to find better employment. Workers have no other options than to get up and walk away as soon as they can.
If companies keep raising wages periodically for their workers, the workers increase production. It most always works out this way. You work as hard you are paid for. Higher wages most always equals higher production.
