Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?

[Pop23]

Why does that matter? You Catholic?

It matters to Biology, in which the vast majority of sex has nothing to do with making babies, and was never meant to.

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

ROFL ^ dumb ass thinks you have to be married to have kids.

Except that appears nowhere in the noted post.

Yes or no, pop, gays can have kids. You can't have it both ways. You can't say one group and one group only is necessary for our species to survive then say you didn't mean gays can't have kids and we'd all be dead if everyone was gay. Make up your mind, either all groups can have kids or not.

Gays CAN have children, but only when coupling with the opposite gender.

Sorry dude, that's an absolute truth.

 

[Pop23]

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

Gays marrying doesn't take anything away from heteros marrying, therefore your argument is ridiculous that the species is going to die out if gay marriage is legalized.

And btw, unmarried parents get virtually every government benefit related to children that married couples do.

Ridiculous is the idea that we don't SEPERATE groups or individuals based on ability.

When was the last time a females best time in the 100 meter dash would have qualified for the men's olympic event?

Anyone need any more proof that gay rights have won?

WTF does that post mean?

Do you know that blind people can't get drivers licenses?

Is that discrimination?

Is the denial of the license based on ability?

Driving is a privilege in this country not a right. The courts have ruled marriage to be a right on numerous occasions. Maybe if you shout at the rain some more it will change the weather but I doubt it.

That doesn't address what YOU would consider discrimination and what I consider sound public policy.

 

[Pop23]

It matters to Biology, in which the vast majority of sex has nothing to do with making babies, and was never meant to.

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

Gays marrying doesn't take anything away from heteros marrying, therefore your argument is ridiculous that the species is going to die out if gay marriage is legalized.

And btw, unmarried parents get virtually every government benefit related to children that married couples do.

Ridiculous is the idea that we don't SEPERATE groups or individuals based on ability.

When was the last time a females best time in the 100 meter dash would have qualified for the men's olympic event?

Anyone need any more proof that gay rights have won?

WTF does that post mean?

It means Pop thinks separating gays from the population is the sporting thing to do.

Or, that we customarily separates groups based on the ability of such groups.

 

[Pop23]

Why does that matter? You Catholic?

It matters to Biology, in which the vast majority of sex has nothing to do with making babies, and was never meant to.

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

ROFL ^ dumb ass thinks you have to be married to have kids.

Except that appears nowhere in the noted post.

Yes or no, pop, gays can have kids. You can't have it both ways. You can't say one group and one group only is necessary for our species to survive then say you didn't mean gays can't have kids and we'd all be dead if everyone was gay. Make up your mind, either all groups can have kids or not.

1000 gay men, 100,000 gay men, a million gay men alone cannot create a single child

Incredible stuff aye?

 

[RKMBrown]

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

Men and women breed. Accepted.
If men and women don't breed the species dies. Accepted.
Most sex has nothing at all to do with breeding. Accepted.
The sex homosexuals normally have is like the sex most heterosexuals normally have, non-reproductive. Accepted.
The same is true of masturbation, for all humans. It is for pleasure only. Accepted.

I have no problem here but you do. You seem to want sex to equal babies apparently, and it never has. They are a byproduct - accept that and move on. It's biology, it's reality, and it's absolutely true...

No babies are ever born without the Union of male to female.

Biologically speaking that makes the two groups unique.

It doesn't make the two groups unique. No babies are born to infertile man/woman couples. No babies are born to couples who successfully practice birth control.

You would be correct if no babies were born of male/female coupling.

Otherwise, you kinda look goofy.

OBTW: when was the last time a same sex couple required birth control not to procreate?

Gay people get pregnant the same way heterosexual people do. Why do you keep asking dumb questions?

 

[RKMBrown]

It matters to Biology, in which the vast majority of sex has nothing to do with making babies, and was never meant to.

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

ROFL ^ dumb ass thinks you have to be married to have kids.

Except that appears nowhere in the noted post.

Yes or no, pop, gays can have kids. You can't have it both ways. You can't say one group and one group only is necessary for our species to survive then say you didn't mean gays can't have kids and we'd all be dead if everyone was gay. Make up your mind, either all groups can have kids or not.

1000 gay men, 100,000 gay men, a million gay men alone cannot create a single child

Incredible stuff aye?

Gay men create children every day. God you're a moron.

 

[RKMBrown]

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

Gays marrying doesn't take anything away from heteros marrying, therefore your argument is ridiculous that the species is going to die out if gay marriage is legalized.

And btw, unmarried parents get virtually every government benefit related to children that married couples do.

Ridiculous is the idea that we don't SEPERATE groups or individuals based on ability.

When was the last time a females best time in the 100 meter dash would have qualified for the men's olympic event?

Anyone need any more proof that gay rights have won?

WTF does that post mean?

It means Pop thinks separating gays from the population is the sporting thing to do.

Or, that we customarily separates groups based on the ability of such groups.

What makes you think gays are less athletic than heterosexuals?

 

[Pop23]

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

Men and women breed. Accepted.
If men and women don't breed the species dies. Accepted.
Most sex has nothing at all to do with breeding. Accepted.
The sex homosexuals normally have is like the sex most heterosexuals normally have, non-reproductive. Accepted.
The same is true of masturbation, for all humans. It is for pleasure only. Accepted.

I have no problem here but you do. You seem to want sex to equal babies apparently, and it never has. They are a byproduct - accept that and move on. It's biology, it's reality, and it's absolutely true...

No babies are ever born without the Union of male to female.

Biologically speaking that makes the two groups unique.

It doesn't make the two groups unique. No babies are born to infertile man/woman couples. No babies are born to couples who successfully practice birth control.

You would be correct if no babies were born of male/female coupling.

Otherwise, you kinda look goofy.

OBTW: when was the last time a same sex couple required birth control not to procreate?

Gay people get pregnant the same way heterosexual people do. Why do you keep asking dumb questions?

Not with their same sex partners.

Not very unique is it.

And when was the last time a same sex coupling required birth control?

 

[Pop23]

Gays marrying doesn't take anything away from heteros marrying, therefore your argument is ridiculous that the species is going to die out if gay marriage is legalized.

And btw, unmarried parents get virtually every government benefit related to children that married couples do.

Ridiculous is the idea that we don't SEPERATE groups or individuals based on ability.

When was the last time a females best time in the 100 meter dash would have qualified for the men's olympic event?

Anyone need any more proof that gay rights have won?

WTF does that post mean?

It means Pop thinks separating gays from the population is the sporting thing to do.

Or, that we customarily separates groups based on the ability of such groups.

What makes you think gays are less athletic than heterosexuals?

What makes you ask such a stoopid question?

Oh, I get it, your deflecting again.

Nice job.

 

[RKMBrown]

Men and women breed. Accepted.
If men and women don't breed the species dies. Accepted.
Most sex has nothing at all to do with breeding. Accepted.
The sex homosexuals normally have is like the sex most heterosexuals normally have, non-reproductive. Accepted.
The same is true of masturbation, for all humans. It is for pleasure only. Accepted.

I have no problem here but you do. You seem to want sex to equal babies apparently, and it never has. They are a byproduct - accept that and move on. It's biology, it's reality, and it's absolutely true...

No babies are ever born without the Union of male to female.

Biologically speaking that makes the two groups unique.

It doesn't make the two groups unique. No babies are born to infertile man/woman couples. No babies are born to couples who successfully practice birth control.

You would be correct if no babies were born of male/female coupling.

Otherwise, you kinda look goofy.

OBTW: when was the last time a same sex couple required birth control not to procreate?

Gay people get pregnant the same way heterosexual people do. Why do you keep asking dumb questions?

Not with their same sex partners.

Not very unique is it.

And when was the last time a same sex coupling required birth control?

When was the last time masturbation created children... oh wait it does every day. FYI being a moron does not make you look smart.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

1000 gay men, 100,000 gay men, a million gay men alone cannot create a single child

?

And neither can millions upon millions of straight people, even young ones, no matter how hard they try. Tell you what, let's have two classes, those that can reproduce and those that can't. Now, what difference does that make in how they are treated? Does one class get balloons, are they closer to God, do we give them a pony?

 

[RKMBrown]

Ridiculous is the idea that we don't SEPERATE groups or individuals based on ability.

When was the last time a females best time in the 100 meter dash would have qualified for the men's olympic event?

Anyone need any more proof that gay rights have won?

WTF does that post mean?

It means Pop thinks separating gays from the population is the sporting thing to do.

Or, that we customarily separates groups based on the ability of such groups.

What makes you think gays are less athletic than heterosexuals?

What makes you ask such a stoopid question?

Oh, I get it, your deflecting again.

Nice job.

You deflected to sports, old man, not me.

 

[Pop23]

No babies are ever born without the Union of male to female.

Biologically speaking that makes the two groups unique.

It doesn't make the two groups unique. No babies are born to infertile man/woman couples. No babies are born to couples who successfully practice birth control.

You would be correct if no babies were born of male/female coupling.

Otherwise, you kinda look goofy.

OBTW: when was the last time a same sex couple required birth control not to procreate?

Gay people get pregnant the same way heterosexual people do. Why do you keep asking dumb questions?

Not with their same sex partners.

Not very unique is it.

And when was the last time a same sex coupling required birth control?

When was the last time masturbation created children... oh wait it does every day. FYI being a moron does not make you look smart.

Sure, if the partners are opposite sex.

Another absolute.

Public school graduate?

 

[Pop23]

Anyone need any more proof that gay rights have won?

WTF does that post mean?

It means Pop thinks separating gays from the population is the sporting thing to do.

Or, that we customarily separates groups based on the ability of such groups.

What makes you think gays are less athletic than heterosexuals?

What makes you ask such a stoopid question?

Oh, I get it, your deflecting again.

Nice job.

You deflected to sports, old man, not me.

Nope, we discussing demographic groups.

Nice try? Or was that just a bit over your head?

 

[Pop23]

1000 gay men, 100,000 gay men, a million gay men alone cannot create a single child

?

And neither can millions upon millions of straight people, even young ones, no matter how hard they try. Tell you what, let's have two classes, those that can reproduce and those that can't. Now, what difference does that make in how they are treated? Does one class get balloons, are they closer to God, do we give them a pony?

There Ya go, attacking the disabled

 

[RKMBrown]

It doesn't make the two groups unique. No babies are born to infertile man/woman couples. No babies are born to couples who successfully practice birth control.

You would be correct if no babies were born of male/female coupling.

Otherwise, you kinda look goofy.

OBTW: when was the last time a same sex couple required birth control not to procreate?

Gay people get pregnant the same way heterosexual people do. Why do you keep asking dumb questions?

Not with their same sex partners.

Not very unique is it.

And when was the last time a same sex coupling required birth control?

When was the last time masturbation created children... oh wait it does every day. FYI being a moron does not make you look smart.

Sure, if the partners are opposite sex.

Another absolute.

Public school graduate?

Since when did someone have to be a "partner" to have sex? I graduated, yes.

 

[RKMBrown]

It means Pop thinks separating gays from the population is the sporting thing to do.

Or, that we customarily separates groups based on the ability of such groups.

What makes you think gays are less athletic than heterosexuals?

What makes you ask such a stoopid question?

Oh, I get it, your deflecting again.

Nice job.

You deflected to sports, old man, not me.

Nope, we discussing demographic groups.

Nice try? Or was that just a bit over your head?

You deflected to sports, old man, not me.

 

[bodecea]

It matters to Biology, in which the vast majority of sex has nothing to do with making babies, and was never meant to.

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

ROFL ^ dumb ass thinks you have to be married to have kids.

Except that appears nowhere in the noted post.

Yes or no, pop, gays can have kids. You can't have it both ways. You can't say one group and one group only is necessary for our species to survive then say you didn't mean gays can't have kids and we'd all be dead if everyone was gay. Make up your mind, either all groups can have kids or not.

Gays CAN have children, but only when coupling with the opposite gender.

Sorry dude, that's an absolute truth.

So you don't believe in adoption or in envitro. Not very bright or aware, are you?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

1000 gay men, 100,000 gay men, a million gay men alone cannot create a single child

?

And neither can millions upon millions of straight people, even young ones, no matter how hard they try. Tell you what, let's have two classes, those that can reproduce and those that can't. Now, what difference does that make in how they are treated? Does one class get balloons, are they closer to God, do we give them a pony?

There Ya go, attacking the disabled

Not at all. I make no distinction, you do...

 

[RKMBrown]

Still only one group can advance the species. Making the two groups vastly different.

One group IS necessary for our species to survive

The other

Plays zero role

That's as basic as biology gets

As for pleasure and bonding.

One group can use sex for that I suppose

The other group has that PLUS the continuation of the species. Again vastly different

Accept it, the above are all facts, and are all absolutes.

ROFL ^ dumb ass thinks you have to be married to have kids.

Except that appears nowhere in the noted post.

Yes or no, pop, gays can have kids. You can't have it both ways. You can't say one group and one group only is necessary for our species to survive then say you didn't mean gays can't have kids and we'd all be dead if everyone was gay. Make up your mind, either all groups can have kids or not.

Gays CAN have children, but only when coupling with the opposite gender.

Sorry dude, that's an absolute truth.

So you don't believe in adoption or in envitro. Not very bright or aware, are you?

Evidently he doesn't believe in adoption, envitro, singles having sex, affairs, planned babies, surrogacy, or any other such alternative to mission style husband->wife insemination. Course when you point that out he'll just say that's not what he said. Then he'll go off and say gays can't have kids again.