Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?

So what about Republicans, can they spend money when it's the right thing to do? Like when they want to reduce just a little the growth in government spending and the terrorist Obama Bin Laden straps a bomb to his chest and shuts down the government to stop them? Do the Republicans get to do the right thing too even if it costs money? Or do just the Democrats get that right?
What about Republicans? In terms of my last post, even Republican couples who marry are entitled to the same tax benefits as gay couples, straight couples, black couples, Jewish couples, etc...

That's a clown post, bro. Like I'm telling you... Was that a lame attempt at a joke or are you just stupid?
No, it's a fact .... married Republican couples really are entitled to the same tax breaks as all other married couples. Do you doubt that?

Seriously, you are actually eight years old, aren't you, Faun?

Faun is just a liberal imbecile who doesn't care about facts or logic. Like all liberals, he wants what he wants whether it's logical or not.
You're so brain-dead, it's not even funny. According to nuts like you, people who are denied inalienable rights should just sit down and shut up and just accept it. You should be thankful our forefathers were not as submissive as you. Perhaps if you had a pair of balls you'd understand.
 
Not true. Being gay changes who you can marry for everyone.

Really? Name one

Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

So it's not the government's job to define deviancy, but it is the government's job to decide what "real marriage" is, in fact it's the job of the courts.

That is just stupid, but you are a clown, at least you know that
It's not deciding what "real" marriage is. That's your fallacy.
 
So what about Republicans, can they spend money when it's the right thing to do? Like when they want to reduce just a little the growth in government spending and the terrorist Obama Bin Laden straps a bomb to his chest and shuts down the government to stop them? Do the Republicans get to do the right thing too even if it costs money? Or do just the Democrats get that right?
What about Republicans? In terms of my last post, even Republican couples who marry are entitled to the same tax benefits as gay couples, straight couples, black couples, Jewish couples, etc...

That's a clown post, bro. Like I'm telling you... Was that a lame attempt at a joke or are you just stupid?
No, it's a fact .... married Republican couples really are entitled to the same tax breaks as all other married couples. Do you doubt that?

Seriously, you are actually eight years old, aren't you, Faun?
I guess that means you do doubt it. :dunno: oh well.

No....it means it's a non-sequitur to the question and I'm not chasing you down a rat hole
 
Being black changed who you could marry for every black. Being gay changed who you could marry for zero gays. The laws were applied equally
Not true. Being gay changes who you can marry for everyone.

Really? Name one
RKMBrown

What about him?
He's someone you can marry.

I can marry RKMBrown? And I asked if you were eight. Are you?
 
Really? Name one
RKMBrown
True... Not that I want to marry a guy, since I'm not gay, but I don't appreciate being told I can't even if I wanted to. I don't like being told I can't do something when no one is gonna get hurt by my action.
How do you feel about being told that you can't snort Cocaine?
I don't think it's any of YOUR GOD DAMN BUSINESS WHAT I DO.

I didn't ask you what you do. I asked you how feel about being told that you can't snort Cocaine? Do you believe government should control our access to recreational drugs?

He sure argues like a liberal for a "conservative."

My favorite was how he said I'm not a libertarian I'm a conservative to insult me, then insulted me by saying I'm not actually a conservative. He doesn't think through his arguments, liberals never do.

I can think of nothing less conservative than anyone being able to demand validation who wants it or thinking that anyone actually needs government validation
 
Not true. Being gay changes who you can marry for everyone.

Really? Name one

Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

So it's not the government's job to define deviancy, but it is the government's job to decide what "real marriage" is, in fact it's the job of the courts.

That is just stupid, but you are a clown, at least you know that
There's simply no point in explaining it to you again. You're clearly not capable of understanding and now, contributing to your confusion, the forum sees you don't even know what marriage is about.
 
Really? Name one

Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

The courts have ruled that gender discrimination is perfectly constitutional. In fact, it's legally mandated. Just consider Title XI which forces universities to create women's sports teams.

Do you think men should be allowed to play on the women's basketball team?
Umm... that's not discrimination ... that's equality. Now women can play sports too.

So laws that say "government will do this for women and do something else for men" is not discrimination?

Are you suffering from brain damage?
Cite a specific law and we can discuss it. We can:t discuss the random thoughts floating around inside your skull.

Um, he did, Title IX
 
Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

The courts have ruled that gender discrimination is perfectly constitutional. In fact, it's legally mandated. Just consider Title XI which forces universities to create women's sports teams.

Do you think men should be allowed to play on the women's basketball team?
Umm... that's not discrimination ... that's equality. Now women can play sports too.

So laws that say "government will do this for women and do something else for men" is not discrimination?

Are you suffering from brain damage?
Cite a specific law and we can discuss it. We can:t discuss the random thoughts floating around inside your skull.

Um, he did, Title IX
And I showed how that provides equality. Weren't you paying attention?
 
What about Republicans? In terms of my last post, even Republican couples who marry are entitled to the same tax benefits as gay couples, straight couples, black couples, Jewish couples, etc...

That's a clown post, bro. Like I'm telling you... Was that a lame attempt at a joke or are you just stupid?
No, it's a fact .... married Republican couples really are entitled to the same tax breaks as all other married couples. Do you doubt that?

Seriously, you are actually eight years old, aren't you, Faun?

Faun is just a liberal imbecile who doesn't care about facts or logic. Like all liberals, he wants what he wants whether it's logical or not.
You're so brain-dead, it's not even funny. According to nuts like you, people who are denied inalienable rights should just sit down and shut up and just accept it. You should be thankful our forefathers were not as submissive as you. Perhaps if you had a pair of balls you'd understand.

What "unalienable rights?" Marriage rights are clearly alienable. SS survivor benefits aren't something you can exercise if you're stranded on a desert island.
 
The courts have ruled that gender discrimination is perfectly constitutional. In fact, it's legally mandated. Just consider Title XI which forces universities to create women's sports teams.

Do you think men should be allowed to play on the women's basketball team?
Umm... that's not discrimination ... that's equality. Now women can play sports too.

So laws that say "government will do this for women and do something else for men" is not discrimination?

Are you suffering from brain damage?
Cite a specific law and we can discuss it. We can:t discuss the random thoughts floating around inside your skull.

Um, he did, Title IX
And I showed how that provides equality. Weren't you paying attention?

You showed nothing of the kind. Title XI discriminates against males. Nothing could be more obvious.
 
Really? Name one

Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

Yes he does. It's about reproduction. That's what it has always been about.
Nope, it's not. Many people reproduce without getting married and many married couples never reproduce. I see you're just as ignorant as kaz as to what marriage is about. What a pity. No wonder you two look like such flaming imbeciles arguing against this.

Yes, I don't know what marriage is about, you do. It's about tax breaks and government validation. No one thinks it's about children, WTF, where do I get such a ridiculous idea? Dunno. Maybe because I am a member of the human race and I am not a collectivist with a vacuum between my ears. Could be...
 
Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

Yes he does. It's about reproduction. That's what it has always been about.
Nope, it's not. Many people reproduce without getting married and many married couples never reproduce. I see you're just as ignorant as kaz as to what marriage is about. What a pity. No wonder you two look like such flaming imbeciles arguing against this.

Yeah, and some people drive without a license. Does that mean we don't issue driver's licenses to ensure safety on the road?

The GAYstapo is pathologically stupid.
What a dumb fucking analogy. Driving without a license is illegal. Reproducing without being married is not. Just as Bristol Palin, she can tell you.

LOL, what a clown. You may want to Google the word analogy, since you don't know. An analogy doesn't mean if you identify one difference it's not an analogy. You pointed out people reproduce without a license as an argument that marriage isn't about children. He pointed out people drive without a license too. It was a great point, it killed your argument. Your rebuttal didn't even logically rebut it, you just said there is a different respect they are different, a non-argument
 
Not true. Being gay changes who you can marry for everyone.

Really? Name one

Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

The courts have ruled that gender discrimination is perfectly constitutional. In fact, it's legally mandated. Just consider Title XI which forces universities to create women's sports teams.

Do you think men should be allowed to play on the women's basketball team?
Umm... that's not discrimination ... that's equality. Now women can play sports too.

So when seawytch claims man woman marriage is "gender discrimination" even though she can't show how women are treated differently, you get it.

When bripat asks so can men be excluded from a women's team, you don't get how that's discrimination

Dude, you aren't supposed to swim in the kool-aid, just sip it

:wine:
Who on Earth said a man not getting to play on a woman's basketball team is discrimination?? That's fucking retarded. It would be discrimination if the man wasn't allowed to play on any team because he's a man.

You morons will never get it. Because you can't understand, you'll remain baying at the moon.
 
my first reply here due to the libertard stupidity. :up:

ahhhhhh, let those qweers and lesbos marry, eventually they will all die off due to some dire and sinister communicable disease.
 
What about Republicans? In terms of my last post, even Republican couples who marry are entitled to the same tax benefits as gay couples, straight couples, black couples, Jewish couples, etc...

That's a clown post, bro. Like I'm telling you... Was that a lame attempt at a joke or are you just stupid?
No, it's a fact .... married Republican couples really are entitled to the same tax breaks as all other married couples. Do you doubt that?

Seriously, you are actually eight years old, aren't you, Faun?

Faun is just a liberal imbecile who doesn't care about facts or logic. Like all liberals, he wants what he wants whether it's logical or not.
You're so brain-dead, it's not even funny. According to nuts like you, people who are denied inalienable rights should just sit down and shut up and just accept it. You should be thankful our forefathers were not as submissive as you. Perhaps if you had a pair of balls you'd understand.

That's a clown post, bro. Our Forefathers were very aware of marriage. If it's an "inalienable right," then why didn't they mention it in The Constitution or the Declaration of Independence or any other of those documents?

They did mention God a bunch of times, so that would make us a Theocracy, right?
 
Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

Yes he does. It's about reproduction. That's what it has always been about.
Nope, it's not. Many people reproduce without getting married and many married couples never reproduce. I see you're just as ignorant as kaz as to what marriage is about. What a pity. No wonder you two look like such flaming imbeciles arguing against this.

Yes, I don't know what marriage is about, you do. It's about tax breaks and government validation. No one thinks it's about children, WTF, where do I get such a ridiculous idea? Dunno. Maybe because I am a member of the human race and I am not a collectivist with a vacuum between my ears. Could be...
Nope, it's not about those either, those are just benefits. You really are cluless.
 
Really? Name one

Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

So it's not the government's job to define deviancy, but it is the government's job to decide what "real marriage" is, in fact it's the job of the courts.

That is just stupid, but you are a clown, at least you know that
It's not deciding what "real" marriage is. That's your fallacy.

Right, "deciding what real marriage is" is according to the clown in the conversation a job for government. But it isn't, it's for the people. Well, if the people follow his rules that it's two people. Who aren't related too closely. And they are adults. Or not, government can decide that in allowing the people to do it. But that has nothing to do with government deciding, it's up to government to decide that.

You are a confused little boy
 
That's a clown post, bro. Like I'm telling you... Was that a lame attempt at a joke or are you just stupid?
No, it's a fact .... married Republican couples really are entitled to the same tax breaks as all other married couples. Do you doubt that?

Seriously, you are actually eight years old, aren't you, Faun?

Faun is just a liberal imbecile who doesn't care about facts or logic. Like all liberals, he wants what he wants whether it's logical or not.
You're so brain-dead, it's not even funny. According to nuts like you, people who are denied inalienable rights should just sit down and shut up and just accept it. You should be thankful our forefathers were not as submissive as you. Perhaps if you had a pair of balls you'd understand.

That's a clown post, bro. Our Forefathers were very aware of marriage. If it's an "inalienable right," then why didn't they mention it in The Constitution or the Declaration of Independence or any other of those documents?

They did mention God a bunch of times, so that would make us a Theocracy, right?
I didn't say marriage was an inalienable right. I said they're being denied an inalienable right. Which they are by being denied marriage. No matter how many times this is explained to you, you still don't get it. That's ok, not everyone is capable of understanding. :itsok:
 
Kaz, you can marry a woman and in some states I can't. That's gender discrimination, plain and simple.

Stupid argument. We could both enter a man/woman marriage in every state.

Show where in the Constitution it says government is gender blind
You really have no clue what marriage is about.

So it's not the government's job to define deviancy, but it is the government's job to decide what "real marriage" is, in fact it's the job of the courts.

That is just stupid, but you are a clown, at least you know that
It's not deciding what "real" marriage is. That's your fallacy.

Right, "deciding what real marriage is" is according to the clown in the conversation a job for government. But it isn't, it's for the people. Well, if the people follow his rules that it's two people. Who aren't related too closely. And they are adults. Or not, government can decide that in allowing the people to do it. But that has nothing to do with government deciding, it's up to government to decide that.

You are a confused little boy
Nope. Again, "real marriage" is a strawman of your own silly concoction.
 

Forum List

Back
Top