progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,659
- 38,431
- 2,615
please point it out,,I'm trying not to point out how stupid your question is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
please point it out,,I'm trying not to point out how stupid your question is.
I'm not offended by your question. I'm amused.come on man,, just tell us what hrs of the day we dont need to be armed and we wont need to be armed 24/7 and you dont have to be so offended by it,,
No.you ever going to tell us what hrs we should be armed??
you wont only because it shows your narrative to be that of a crazy person,,
No need. You have pointed it out yourself.please point it out,,
yes I did,, and it shows what a nutjob you are,,No need. You have pointed it out yourself.
I'm sure you hope it did.yes I did,, and it shows what a nutjob you are,,
Thank you. That's a perfect example of twisted right wing logic. Either every nutjob in America is fully armed at all times, or we become China, Russia, or N Korea. You realize there is a vast range in between those two possibilities, don't you?
I understand. You're mind is made up, and facts just confuse you. What else could be expected from your cult?Not interested in any "vast range" only "Shall not be infringed"
I'm trying not to point out how stupid your question is.
These gun grabbers actually believe that this case helps them.United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
Same as Cruikshank.Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
This one is even WORSE for the gun-grabbing commies.United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
Not familiar with this one.Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980)
Pretty much shoots them down again, as it applies to D.C.District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
Makes Heller apply to the states under the 14th Amendment.McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
Not familiar with this one.Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. ___ (2016)
All state and local gun control laws are unconstitutional as well.Thus, ALL Federal gun laws are unconstitutional ON THEIR FACES and all should be universally stricken immediately.
*snip*
ALL FEDERAL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Well if I had the gift of knowing my future and I woke up one day realizing that I would have to use lethal force to protect my health or life, I would just stay home.We are more alike than you know, and situational awareness is quite often called for, but that is not the same as a rational belief that you need to be armed 24/7.
I’d like to thank the conservatives subscribing to this thread for proving correct the thread’s premise.
I'm sure you are an expert on the subject.Good, because your prior statement is about as retarded as they come.
There are thousands of dead, unarmed, innocent, people who might have been saved had they been armed. Worst case, they wouldn't be more dead for having been armed.Well no. If the cowards had ever actually been a victim, that would at least be a rational for feeling the need to be armed 24/7. Being afraid of something that has never happened, and is likely to never happen is just being a coward.
That's completely senseless. It's a different problem and a different tool. If you cross the room to grab your fire extinguisher, your small fire isn't going to reach out and kill you first. If your home is invaded and you have to cross the room, open your safe, and grab a gun, you're very possibly dead.No, but I do have smoke alarms and fire extinguishers. I don't strap a fire extinguisher to my leg every time I go out, though.
I distrust gun nut Rambo wannabees who dream of the chance to shoot somebody.Well if I had the gift of knowing my future and I woke up one day realizing that I would have to use lethal force to protect my health or life, I would just stay home.
Unfortunately I lack that ability.
I have been legally carrying a concealed hand gun for over a quarter of a century and since I don’t play with it in public, it just sits quietly in a pocket holster in my jacket or pants pocket endangering no one.
I took the time and effort and spent the money to get my concealed weapons permit with the intention of carrying on a regular basis and I have and will continue to do so.
Why are you so concerned? Do you distrust honest citizens? Perhaps you feel we are not responsible.
Concealed Carry Permit Holders More Law Abiding Government Police
2nd Amendment critics commonly portray concealed carry permit holders as dangerous to American society. They are More Law Abiding Government Police.ncsportsmenslaw.com
7 Reasons More People Should Concealed Carry
Police are the ideal intermediaries, but personal safety cannot be entirely entrusted to others. It is time for citizens to responsibly conceal a firearm.thefederalist.com
How many people have you had to gun down in your kitchen?That's completely senseless. It's a different problem and a different tool. If you cross the room to grab your fire extinguisher, your small fire isn't going to reach out and kill you first. If your home is invaded and you have to cross the room, open your safe, and grab a gun, you're very possibly dead.
Bees are not a threat everywhere you go and you can predict the likelihood that you won't get stung. And, unless you're allergic, the damage caused by a sting is not permanent.Of course there are victims of violent crime, and there are times when being armed is the best logical choice. I have always said that. Not everywhere you might be, and not 2/47. My neighbor keeps bees, but he doesn't wear his bee suit 24/7.