Abatis
Platinum Member
I’d like to thank the conservatives subscribing to this thread for proving correct the thread’s premise.
You are such a poser, I tore your dumb OP apart on the first page of this thread and have continued to knock out every single leg of support you have tried since the OP.
You have demonstrated no independent knowledge of the particular laws or constitutional principles at work here, all you can do is parrot the goofy premises of the article you linked to in the OP.
You are not smart enough to know that the theory of the article is completely backwards, it's the pro-regulation, anti-gun side that is the"aspirational 2ndA"-- the gun rights side is the one with SCOTUS supporting it. I have asked you again and again to cite the judicial decisions that support your theory, you refuse.
Tell me, which examples of the "judicial 2ndA" support your pro-regulation, anti-gun side:
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886)
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980)
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010)
Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. ___ (2016)
The very narrow illegitimately constructed "judicial" support the regulation side has enjoyed for 14 years, was destroyed less than a week after your article was published, at SCOTUS in the oral arguments in NYSRPA v Bruen.
It is clear that the "two-step" scheme the gun control endorsing Circuits have employed since Heller, is going to be gutted. The Circuits all know it; the 9th and 3rd Circuits have held-up enforcement of their decisions sustaining high-cap mag bans and assault weapon bans until NYSRPA is settled.
The gun rights "judicial 2ndA" is kicking the ass of the political, wishful thinking, anti-gun side.
You talk about state lawmakers operating past the orbit of the 2ndA but right now the political anti-2ndA machine in New York is in panic-mode, desperately trying to implement a myriad of new gun laws and citizen restrictions to have in effect when the enforcement of the real 2ndA is finally begun in New York.
Your entire premise is backwards, it is the pro-regulation, anti-gun side that is operating under an "aspirational" fantasy of what they want the 2nd Amendment to be. The gun rights side is operating under the true meaning which aligns with the "judicial 2nA" that has been enforced by SCOTUS without deviation since 1876, and will continue to be enforced,
Your best bet is to just be quiet, stop with these completely wrong posts that we all will point to an say, "well, that didn't age well" and just let this dog of a thread roll off the front page.
You really should hunker-down and prepare for the brutal reckoning that you anti-gun / anti-Constitution traitors will be suffering in June.
Last edited: