Why Workers in Red States Vote Against Their Economic Self-Interest

There is nothing wrong with having moral principles that don't put yourself over other people. The problem is really that there is an assumed morality to capitalism that ignores the reality because morality is established through laws as opposed to applied reason. When someone is not good at applying reason a strict legal framework for morality is often needed but that still leaves someone to establish the rules.

Reagan actually went a long way to establishing a lot of these laws in the minds of conservatives concerning the economy. His success was so complete that they will go to great lengths to ignore reality, including the reality of the Reagan administration. Just try bringing up the increase of debt that happened under Reagan and you will see the faithful scramble to make excuses and dismiss the reality.

But you won't factor in the tone deafness, which you are afflicted with, of the left,there are plenty of conservatives that bitched about high spending from GWB back to Ron,but no we hear this instead.

A good defense is a good offense after all.
 
For years, political scientists have wondered why so many poor and working-class citizens of so-called “red” states vote against their economic self-interest.
The wages of production workers have been dropping for 30 years, adjusted for inflation, and their economic security has disappeared. A smaller share of working-age Americans hold jobs today than at any time in more than three decades.
For them, a job is precious — sometimes even more precious than a safe workplace or safe drinking water.
This is especially true in poorer regions of the country like West Virginia and through much of Southern and rural America, where the old working class has been voting Republican. Guns, abortion and race are part of the explanation. But don’t overlook economic anxieties that translate into a willingness to vote for whatever it is that industry wants.
This may explain why Republican officials who have been casting their votes against unions, against expanding Medicaid, against raising the minimum wage, against extended unemployment insurance, and against jobs bills that would put people to work, continue to be elected and re-elected.
They obviously have the support of corporate patrons who want to keep unemployment high and workers insecure because a pliant working class helps their bottom lines.

As someone who has lived in the south for the past half of my life it always puzzled me why people in this region always vote against their self interests and defend the same people who exploit them . I attribute it to a plantation mentality ...

It is highly possible that red state voters realize that there is no free lunch, and that every benefit given to one person has to be paid for by someone else. And, it is almost certain that the red state voter is going to be one of those doing the paying.

Those extra dollars paid to mimimum wage earners didn't just materialize out of the air, it came out of someone's pocket, either directly or indirectly.

They also may realize that Medicaid is becoming a farce, as fewer and fewer doctors will accept new Medicaid patients. And, once again someone has to cough up to pay the bills.

Mostly however, it is because red state voters have common sense and realize that the liberal/socialist agenda will bring this nation to economic ruin, and they know, full well, that is not in their best economic interests.
 
They vote against immediate rewards because the underlying causes are not obvious as the talking points that the debates are almost always limited to. The usual fights that go nowhere are a diversion to keep us from getting anywhere from the real issues.

IMHO - what you say is probably 90% of the issue. But I have a problem with the assumption of the OP.

Was it in the individual self interest of those soldiers to hit beaches in the Pacific or in France?

Why would anyone assume that poor red-state voters are voting out of ignorance? Can't they be sacrificing their own individual self interests to support the interests of the whole? And if they are - isn't that a selfless act?

They do their best to blame everything on Republicans and make the sheep believe we are morons. And it works! :lol:
 
Last edited:
They vote against immediate rewards because the underlying causes are not obvious as the talking points that the debates are almost always limited to. The usual fights that go nowhere are a diversion to keep us from getting anywhere from the real issues.

IMHO - what you say is probably 90% of the issue. But I have a problem with the assumption of the OP.

Was it in the individual self interest of those soldiers to hit beaches in the Pacific or in France?

Why would anyone assume that poor red-state voters are voting out of ignorance? Can't they be sacrificing their own individual self interests to support the interests of the whole? And if they are - isn't that a selfless act?

They do their best to blame everything on Republicans and make the sheep believe we are morons. And it works! :lol:

Well - imho - there are those on both sides who try to marginalize the other side by assuming they only vote the way they do because they are ignorant, Kool Aid drinkers.

Some are and some aren't - on BOTH sides of the aisle. But to just assume that anyone who disagrees with you only does so because they are stupid .... well, imho, life in an echo chamber is not very fulfilling.
 
Did you ever consider that artificially manipulated wages through government isn't in our best interests? Crazy thought there!
 
There is nothing wrong with having moral principles that don't put yourself over other people. The problem is really that there is an assumed morality to capitalism that ignores the reality because morality is established through laws as opposed to applied reason. When someone is not good at applying reason a strict legal framework for morality is often needed but that still leaves someone to establish the rules.

Reagan actually went a long way to establishing a lot of these laws in the minds of conservatives concerning the economy. His success was so complete that they will go to great lengths to ignore reality, including the reality of the Reagan administration. Just try bringing up the increase of debt that happened under Reagan and you will see the faithful scramble to make excuses and dismiss the reality.

Events under Reagan have very little to do with today's economic realities. Why don't you just say, "Bbbb...Bushy."

The point I was making was that Reagan was hugely influential on the minds of Republicans today and their understanding of economic policy. A lot of changes happened under Reagan that are relevant today as well. So your post is doubly wrong. Congratulations!
 
.

So the only reason to vote for something is so that someone will give you something?

Maybe not everyone thinks that way.

.

Wait, you mean people vote their own self interests? Dam thats terrible


I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.
 
There is nothing wrong with having moral principles that don't put yourself over other people. The problem is really that there is an assumed morality to capitalism that ignores the reality because morality is established through laws as opposed to applied reason. When someone is not good at applying reason a strict legal framework for morality is often needed but that still leaves someone to establish the rules.

Reagan actually went a long way to establishing a lot of these laws in the minds of conservatives concerning the economy. His success was so complete that they will go to great lengths to ignore reality, including the reality of the Reagan administration. Just try bringing up the increase of debt that happened under Reagan and you will see the faithful scramble to make excuses and dismiss the reality.

But you won't factor in the tone deafness, which you are afflicted with, of the left,there are plenty of conservatives that bitched about high spending from GWB back to Ron,but no we hear this instead.

A good defense is a good offense after all.

Case in point.
 
.

So the only reason to vote for something is so that someone will give you something?

Maybe not everyone thinks that way.

.

Wait, you mean people vote their own self interests? Dam thats terrible


I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

Whaaaaaa? I have something crazy for you. Some people enjoy the taste of Salsa from New York City.

Now can we talk about what I said? Everyone votes their own self interest. You are trying to make it sound bad like "how dare they?"

Notice I mentioned nothing about depending on others at all. But when talking points are all you have, you have to throw them in somewhere. :D
 
.

So the only reason to vote for something is so that someone will give you something?

Maybe not everyone thinks that way.

.

wait, you mean people vote their own self interests? Dam thats terrible


i can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

blasphemy!
 
Wait, you mean people vote their own self interests? Dam thats terrible


I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

Whaaaaaa? I have something crazy for you. Some people enjoy the taste of Salsa from New York City.

Now can we talk about what I said? Everyone votes their own self interest. You are trying to make it sound bad like "how dare they?"

Notice I mentioned nothing about depending on others at all. But when talking points are all you have, you have to throw them in somewhere. :D


You tossed in the talking points, I responded.

So we're back to my point: Not everyone equates "voting in their best interest" with voting to get stuff. That's my response to the OP, and I'm confident you understand my point. You can respond with more snark, or you can explain why you disagree. Your call, I don't care.

.
 
Wait, you mean people vote their own self interests? Dam thats terrible


I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

Whaaaaaa? I have something crazy for you. Some people enjoy the taste of Salsa from New York City.

Now can we talk about what I said? Everyone votes their own self interest. You are trying to make it sound bad like "how dare they?"

Notice I mentioned nothing about depending on others at all. But when talking points are all you have, you have to throw them in somewhere. :D

You're wrong. I vote for what I feel is best for the country, not necessarily what's best for me. I doubt I'm the only person that votes unselfishly.
 
I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

Whaaaaaa? I have something crazy for you. Some people enjoy the taste of Salsa from New York City.

Now can we talk about what I said? Everyone votes their own self interest. You are trying to make it sound bad like "how dare they?"

Notice I mentioned nothing about depending on others at all. But when talking points are all you have, you have to throw them in somewhere. :D

You're wrong. I vote for what I feel is best for the country, not necessarily what's best for me. I doubt I'm the only person that votes unselfishly.


That's how they look at it. Selfishly.

.
 
IT'S HILARIOUS REALLY; left-wing idiots trying to lecture about voting against their own interests.
the top states for the hightest unemployment are Blue states; and the lowest unemployment is in Red states.

Along with the lowest wages.
\

um not really leftard; and prices for things are lower in Red states, which makes up for that

and lower as in North Dakota and the oil worker jobs?

lol; who give shit what a crybaby left-wingnut who cant handle facts thinks?



along with the jobs; FACT, jobs are leaving Blue states and going to Red states



Really? You mean things like a new car? Or travel? Or education? Or online purchases?


Only in the bizzaro world of conservatopia is making less better than making more.
 
I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

Whaaaaaa? I have something crazy for you. Some people enjoy the taste of Salsa from New York City.

Now can we talk about what I said? Everyone votes their own self interest. You are trying to make it sound bad like "how dare they?"

Notice I mentioned nothing about depending on others at all. But when talking points are all you have, you have to throw them in somewhere. :D

You're wrong. I vote for what I feel is best for the country, not necessarily what's best for me. I doubt I'm the only person that votes unselfishly.

I don't find those mutually exclusive. Whats in the best interests of the country is in my best interest.
 
I can only imagine how crazy this is going to sound to you, but here goes:

Some people feel that being dependent on others is not in their best interest.

Holy crap, wild, huh?

.

Whaaaaaa? I have something crazy for you. Some people enjoy the taste of Salsa from New York City.

Now can we talk about what I said? Everyone votes their own self interest. You are trying to make it sound bad like "how dare they?"

Notice I mentioned nothing about depending on others at all. But when talking points are all you have, you have to throw them in somewhere. :D

You're wrong. I vote for what I feel is best for the country, not necessarily what's best for me. I doubt I'm the only person that votes unselfishly.

Whats best for the country isnt your interest then? :cuckoo:

What the fuck god? Why am I surrounded by retards?
 

Forum List

Back
Top