- Thread starter
- #1,261
But the UN decideds when they are finished inspecting, even the Bush White House admitted this, your link proved that.
What do Saddam and 9/11 have to do with each other?
No he didn't, he said "the matter is up to the United Nations". (From your link)
What Congress actually said, "..if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions."
Neither case is true as previously illustrated.
Here's what Blix actually said.
Iraq war wasn't justified, U.N. weapons experts say - CNN
6) 3/2003 there time run out
Did you want to try again? You're thread is an epic failure.
Dude you keep ignoring the simple facts
9-11? we got that one wrong, we found that out after we invaded, no-one made that claim and could back it up prior to 9-11
and as far as what did 9-11 have to do wih it? your smarter than that
but if I must, it changed the game for ever
they chosse to ignore nothing
Blix made the statement of the 6500 munitions and the anthrax and the other "stuff" was made on jan of 2003
you keep going past tense as though Blix made those commentd your using prior to 1/2003
he was covering his ass
my threads are not my information
they are from the US senate
Blix and the Un
the DOD
there not mine, I am sorry those facts hurt your agenda
you got a problem with that, take it up with google
go away, your wasting my time and energy unless you can find a link that was made after 1/2003 and before 3-2003 that blix states his 1-2003 where in correct
and one that the DOD states there statements to congress in 2006 where in-correct
and finally one in which the US congress went back on there resolution 10/2002 granting the US the power to attack Saddam
you have reached a point in whish your reality has found a place in which no matter how hard you will try, you cannot change these facts
your spinning the events that in realiy are events that took place from 10-2002 thru 3-2003
events I had little to do with except who I voted for
You keep repeating the same stuff over and over again. Try to rebut the information in my posts.
For example, did Bush state ""the matter is up to the United Nations" or not?
What do you think he meant by that in the context of the article in the link in your thread that quotes his White House making this statement?
Let's start with an easy one and work into it.
I'll wait for you to answer before we go on, ok?
I keep re peating the same stuff because its the truth
why would I rebutted information that has nothing to do with those events that began on October of 2002 and with the exception of the DODs presentation to congress in 2006, ended on March of 2003
GWB was correct in his statement that It was the UNs place to end that mess
It was also his place to give them an end date
It was also hisplace to tell the world thru congress in 2002, October, that tiime was running out
What do you think after Blix made those comments on or about 1/26/2003 about the missing WMDS, anthrax, etc.... he was going to do?
Saddam opens the doors up
allows flyovers with the U-2
produces the 6500 munitions HE said HE had
Anthrax
etc...
10/2002 is not needed
why do you defend Saddam to blame Bush?