Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of General Flynn?

[Nostra]

No, Mamooth, you are displaying classic signs of denial. You don't want to understand the realities of this situation because you don't want to. It is beyond your capacity to reason.

The reality is that the Flynn unmasking was a routine operation, one that happens thousands of times a year in any administration.

The reality is that Flynn was communicating with those involved with Russian election interference, and US intelligence officials needed to know who he was so they could understand the context of those communications.

Either you didn't know that, which makes you a rube, or you did know it, which means you're actively running interference for the Russians. Which is it? In either case, it means nobody should pay attention to you.

The reality is that Trump himself declared that Flynn was totally guilty.


---
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!
Donald J. Trump Dec. 2, 2017
---

According to your conspiracy theory, Trump was apparently one of the ones conspiring against Trump.

That illustrates the big benefit of being a Trump cultist -- they're all blessedly free of the curse of long-term memory. To a Trump cultist, reality is whatever they imagine it to be at any given moment.

The reality, despite this sea of words, is this:

Who leaked his name to the Washington Post? (See 18 U.S.C. 798 (a)(1)) Who blackmailed him into pleading guilty to those trumped-up charges, lest they go after his son?

What would you have done? Would you A) offer your son up as a sacrifice to save your own hide or B) or would you plead guilty to spare your son the wrath of a corrupt government?

Who altered the 302 forms? Why was Joe Biden seeking his to unmask his identity? These are questions you don't want to consider.

You are too politically biased to see the injustice being perpetrated. You just want the man punished because he worked for Trump. That's it. That's all.

The reason he pled guilty was to forestall more serious charges. He was under investigation for his lobbying activities. He was working for the ISLAMIC PRESIDENT of Turkey. If he had succeeded, a opponent of Erdogan who sought asylum in the United States would have been returned to Turkey to be killed. Flynn is a traitor and one of his sons was in it as deep as Flynn was.

You are the one who is politically biased. You are the one who wants injustices. You want to let this crook off the hook because Trump says so. That is called corruption.

Flynn is a traitor

Another single digit IQ Dimwinger who has no clue what constitutes "treason".

 

[busybee01]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

 

[Nostra]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

Why are you afraid to see what his reason was? Obama's NSA was as corrupt as the rest of his lawless regime.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Who did the NSA work for at the time? Take a minute and think about it. Don't strain yourself!

 

[busybee01]

No, Mamooth, you are displaying classic signs of denial. You don't want to understand the realities of this situation because you don't want to. It is beyond your capacity to reason.

The reality is that the Flynn unmasking was a routine operation, one that happens thousands of times a year in any administration.

The reality is that Flynn was communicating with those involved with Russian election interference, and US intelligence officials needed to know who he was so they could understand the context of those communications.

Either you didn't know that, which makes you a rube, or you did know it, which means you're actively running interference for the Russians. Which is it? In either case, it means nobody should pay attention to you.

The reality is that Trump himself declared that Flynn was totally guilty.


---
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!
Donald J. Trump Dec. 2, 2017
---

According to your conspiracy theory, Trump was apparently one of the ones conspiring against Trump.

That illustrates the big benefit of being a Trump cultist -- they're all blessedly free of the curse of long-term memory. To a Trump cultist, reality is whatever they imagine it to be at any given moment.

The reality, despite this sea of words, is this:

Who leaked his name to the Washington Post? (See 18 U.S.C. 798 (a)(1)) Who blackmailed him into pleading guilty to those trumped-up charges, lest they go after his son?

What would you have done? Would you A) offer your son up as a sacrifice to save your own hide or B) or would you plead guilty to spare your son the wrath of a corrupt government?

Who altered the 302 forms? Why was Joe Biden seeking his to unmask his identity? These are questions you don't want to consider.

You are too politically biased to see the injustice being perpetrated. You just want the man punished because he worked for Trump. That's it. That's all.

The reason he pled guilty was to forestall more serious charges. He was under investigation for his lobbying activities. He was working for the ISLAMIC PRESIDENT of Turkey. If he had succeeded, a opponent of Erdogan who sought asylum in the United States would have been returned to Turkey to be killed. Flynn is a traitor and one of his sons was in it as deep as Flynn was.

You are the one who is politically biased. You are the one who wants injustices. You want to let this crook off the hook because Trump says so. That is called corruption.

Flynn is a traitor

Another single digit IQ Dimwinger who has no clue what constitutes "treason".

The fact that Flynn would conspire to return a individual who sought asylum in the US to a country where he would be killed is traitorous. You have no clue what treason is as you use it regularly against your political opponents.

Your IQ is below zero.

 

[Care4all]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

He requested an unmasking of someone involved, in an intelligence report he received. No way to know who was being unmasked in the Intel report, until they are unmasked.

Unmasking is solely for the AUTHORIZED person requesting the unmasking and not for view by anyone else. In some cases the chief of staff of the executive may also see it or request it for the executive requesting an unmasking.

Unmasking is not guaranteed. A formal request is made by the authorized person and a national security person has to determine if the reason for the request is pertinent to understanding the intelligence report.

It is a common action for those who are authorized and cleared.

The Obama administration in 2016, requested 9200 unmaskings.

The Trump administration in 2019, requested 22,000 unmaskings.

 

[busybee01]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

Why are you afraid to see what his reason was? Obama's NSA was as corrupt as the rest of his lawless regime.

I know, Standard Trumpian answer. Everyone is conspiring.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No, Mamooth, you are displaying classic signs of denial. You don't want to understand the realities of this situation because you don't want to. It is beyond your capacity to reason.

The reality is that the Flynn unmasking was a routine operation, one that happens thousands of times a year in any administration.

The reality is that Flynn was communicating with those involved with Russian election interference, and US intelligence officials needed to know who he was so they could understand the context of those communications.

Either you didn't know that, which makes you a rube, or you did know it, which means you're actively running interference for the Russians. Which is it? In either case, it means nobody should pay attention to you.

The reality is that Trump himself declared that Flynn was totally guilty.


---
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!
Donald J. Trump Dec. 2, 2017
---

According to your conspiracy theory, Trump was apparently one of the ones conspiring against Trump.

That illustrates the big benefit of being a Trump cultist -- they're all blessedly free of the curse of long-term memory. To a Trump cultist, reality is whatever they imagine it to be at any given moment.

The reality, despite this sea of words, is this:

Who leaked his name to the Washington Post? (See 18 U.S.C. 798 (a)(1)) Who blackmailed him into pleading guilty to those trumped-up charges, lest they go after his son?

What would you have done? Would you A) offer your son up as a sacrifice to save your own hide or B) or would you plead guilty to spare your son the wrath of a corrupt government?

Who altered the 302 forms? Why was Joe Biden seeking his to unmask his identity? These are questions you don't want to consider.

You are too politically biased to see the injustice being perpetrated. You just want the man punished because he worked for Trump. That's it. That's all.

The reason he pled guilty was to forestall more serious charges. He was under investigation for his lobbying activities. He was working for the ISLAMIC PRESIDENT of Turkey. If he had succeeded, a opponent of Erdogan who sought asylum in the United States would have been returned to Turkey to be killed. Flynn is a traitor and one of his sons was in it as deep as Flynn was.

You are the one who is politically biased. You are the one who wants injustices. You want to let this crook off the hook because Trump says so. That is called corruption.

Flynn is a traitor

Another single digit IQ Dimwinger who has no clue what constitutes "treason".

The fact that Flynn would conspire to return a individual who sought asylum in the US to a country where he would be killed is traitorous. You have no clue what treason is as you use it regularly against your political opponents.

Your IQ is below zero.

That is NOT treason even in your oxygen-deprived mind.

 

[Nostra]

No, Mamooth, you are displaying classic signs of denial. You don't want to understand the realities of this situation because you don't want to. It is beyond your capacity to reason.

The reality is that the Flynn unmasking was a routine operation, one that happens thousands of times a year in any administration.

The reality is that Flynn was communicating with those involved with Russian election interference, and US intelligence officials needed to know who he was so they could understand the context of those communications.

Either you didn't know that, which makes you a rube, or you did know it, which means you're actively running interference for the Russians. Which is it? In either case, it means nobody should pay attention to you.

The reality is that Trump himself declared that Flynn was totally guilty.


---
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!
Donald J. Trump Dec. 2, 2017
---

According to your conspiracy theory, Trump was apparently one of the ones conspiring against Trump.

That illustrates the big benefit of being a Trump cultist -- they're all blessedly free of the curse of long-term memory. To a Trump cultist, reality is whatever they imagine it to be at any given moment.

The reality, despite this sea of words, is this:

Who leaked his name to the Washington Post? (See 18 U.S.C. 798 (a)(1)) Who blackmailed him into pleading guilty to those trumped-up charges, lest they go after his son?

What would you have done? Would you A) offer your son up as a sacrifice to save your own hide or B) or would you plead guilty to spare your son the wrath of a corrupt government?

Who altered the 302 forms? Why was Joe Biden seeking his to unmask his identity? These are questions you don't want to consider.

You are too politically biased to see the injustice being perpetrated. You just want the man punished because he worked for Trump. That's it. That's all.

The reason he pled guilty was to forestall more serious charges. He was under investigation for his lobbying activities. He was working for the ISLAMIC PRESIDENT of Turkey. If he had succeeded, a opponent of Erdogan who sought asylum in the United States would have been returned to Turkey to be killed. Flynn is a traitor and one of his sons was in it as deep as Flynn was.

You are the one who is politically biased. You are the one who wants injustices. You want to let this crook off the hook because Trump says so. That is called corruption.

Flynn is a traitor

Another single digit IQ Dimwinger who has no clue what constitutes "treason".

The fact that Flynn would conspire to return a individual who sought asylum in the US to a country where he would be killed is traitorous. You have no clue what treason is as you use it regularly against your political opponents.

Your IQ is below zero.

Once again you clearly demonstrate you do not know the definition of "treason".

keep making a fool of yourself, it's getting hilarious.

 

[Nostra]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

Why are you afraid to see what his reason was? Obama's NSA was as corrupt as the rest of his lawless regime.

I know, Standard Trumpian answer. Everyone is conspiring.

You avoided the question............typical Dimwinger snowflake.

 

[MACAULAY]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

He requested an unmasking of someone involved, in an intelligence report he received. No way to know who was being unmasked in the Intel report, until they are unmasked.

Unmasking is solely for the AUTHORIZED person requesting the unmasking and not for view by anyone else. In some cases the chief of staff of the executive may also see it or request it for the executive requesting an unmasking.

Unmasking is not guaranteed. A formal request is made by the authorized person and a national security person has to determine if the reason for the request is pertinent to understanding the intelligence report.

It is a common action for those who are authorized and cleared.

The Obama administration in 2016, requested 9200 unmasking.

The Trump administration in 2019, requested 22,000 unmasking.

_____

Bull Shit. He heard about Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador and the old Fool was curious and wanted to read for himself. And he could be the one who then leaked it to the Washington Post--a Felony. He must sit for a Deposition under oath.

We have to investigate whether a person who might be President is a Felon who should by on Rikers Island instead of in the White House.

____
______

 

[busybee01]

I like that:

"Cue the spluttering apoplexy about... something. Useful idiots, all."

As dodges go, from you half-wit numb-skull Bolsheviks, it was o.k.

The Question, however, which has so far gone unanswered...which has in fact, been run from like it was a case of the Clap IS:

What was Uncle Joe Biden doing unmasking the conversations of General Flynn eight days before the end of his term as Vice-President?

Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

____

Thanks. Otherwise, just read my response as often as necessary for you to understand it. I know you'll get it, one day.

I like that:

"Cue the spluttering apoplexy about... something. Useful idiots, all."

As dodges go, from you half-wit numb-skull Bolsheviks, it was o.k.

The Question, however, which has so far gone unanswered...which has in fact, been run from like it was a case of the Clap IS:

What was Uncle Joe Biden doing unmasking the conversations of General Flynn eight days before the end of his term as Vice-President?

Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

____

Thanks. Otherwise, just read my response as often as necessary for you to understand it. I know you'll get it, one day.

------

Read This from your post?

"An official with a top level security clearance sees an intelligence product - name of U.S. person redacted. Finds, this U.S. person might do something nefarious, and asks the NSA to unmask that person..."

My Question still is:

How does Uncle Joe Biden fit into this---Eight (8) days before he left office? Had Uncle Joe figured out that Flynn might do something nefarious? As Vice-President? Eight days before he leaves office?

Was he going to start an investigation?

That had already been done. And he knew it, because he was in the meeting at the White House with the other leaders of the attempt to undermine Trump's Presidency---including Obama, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Rice and Yates.

Your Dodges are increasingly exposed as Dodges.

Can you answer? Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?

Like it or not Obama is still the President. Flynn had no business discussing policy until Trump took office. Given the subject matter, Biden and anyone connected with foreign policy had a reason to know. Flynn does something wrong and Trump supporters blame everyone else but Trump.

No one was conspiring to do anything. That is just your crazy imagination. Facts are not dodges. You are doing the dodging. You ignore the fact that Flynn had no business talking to Kislyak while Obama was President.

______

Amazing that you are such an authority on the Logan Act---passed in 1799 under the Adams administration along with his onerous Sedition Acts, which quashed political dissent of his Administration.

The Logan Act has never been used to get a conviction, and only two people have ever been indicted---both before the Civil War.

Legal Experts are virtually unanimous, perhaps actually unanimous, that it does not apply to members of an incoming Administration, and in fact, even Democrats acknowledge that Flynn was doing his job in talking to Ambassadors, including the Russian Ambassador.

No one has even attempted to explain what Sniffin Joe Biden was doing nosing around in Flynn's personal phone calls---it was not in his job description to investigate possible violations of the Logan Act, or anything else--and he certainly was not going to do anything "official" in the eight days he had left in office.

Not, however, that the same day Biden snooped Flynn, the Washington Post got a leak on the unmasking---which is a Felony. And Uncle Joe does like to flap his gums---with no known filter.

Got to sit him down, put him under oath---and see if he remembers what he was up to. Justice demands it.

This was not a personal phone call. He was talking policy to Kislyak and essentially negotiating om behalf of the US. Something he had no authority to do. He certainly had a right to know who was undermining the Administration's policies.

You have no clue what justice is. The NSA found his reasons to see the information sufficient and that is the end of it.

 

[Nostra]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

He requested an unmasking of someone involved, in an intelligence report he received. No way to know who was being unmasked in the Intel report, until they are unmasked.

Unmasking is solely for the AUTHORIZED person requesting the unmasking and not for view by anyone else. In some cases the chief of staff of the executive may also see it or request it for the executive requesting an unmasking.

Unmasking is not guaranteed. A formal request is made by the authorized person and a national security person has to determine if the reason for the request is pertinent to understanding the intelligence report.

It is a common action for those who are authorized and cleared.

The Obama administration in 2016, requested 9200 unmasking.

The Trump administration in 2019, requested 22,000 unmasking.

_____

Bull Shit. He heard about Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador and the old Fool was curious and wanted to read for himself. And he could be the one who then leaked it to the Washington Post--a Felony. He must sit for a Deposition under oath.

We have to investigate whether a person who might be President is a Felon who should by on Rikers Island instead of in the White House.

____
______

Crazy Joe's request came right before the leak to the Post.

Hmmmm..............................

 

[Care4all]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

He requested an unmasking of someone involved, in an intelligence report he received. No way to know who was being unmasked in the Intel report, until they are unmasked.

Unmasking is solely for the AUTHORIZED person requesting the unmasking and not for view by anyone else. In some cases the chief of staff of the executive may also see it or request it for the executive requesting an unmasking.

Unmasking is not guaranteed. A formal request is made by the authorized person and a national security person has to determine if the reason for the request is pertinent to understanding the intelligence report.

It is a common action for those who are authorized and cleared.

The Obama administration in 2016, requested 9200 unmasking.

The Trump administration in 2019, requested 22,000 unmasking.

_____

Bull Shit. He heard about Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador and the old Fool was curious and wanted to read for himself. And he could be the one who then leaked it to the Washington Post--a Felony. He must sit for a Deposition under oath.

We have to investigate whether a person who might be President is a Felon who should by on Rikers Island instead of in the White House.

____
______

 

[busybee01]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

Why are you afraid to see what his reason was? Obama's NSA was as corrupt as the rest of his lawless regime.

I know, Standard Trumpian answer. Everyone is conspiring.

You avoided the question............typical Dimwinger snowflake.

Typical Trump stupidity. I don't respond to crazy conspiracy theories. The NSA found his reasons for seeing the information sufficient. The NSA was not conspiring with anyone.

 

[busybee01]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

He requested an unmasking of someone involved, in an intelligence report he received. No way to know who was being unmasked in the Intel report, until they are unmasked.

Unmasking is solely for the AUTHORIZED person requesting the unmasking and not for view by anyone else. In some cases the chief of staff of the executive may also see it or request it for the executive requesting an unmasking.

Unmasking is not guaranteed. A formal request is made by the authorized person and a national security person has to determine if the reason for the request is pertinent to understanding the intelligence report.

It is a common action for those who are authorized and cleared.

The Obama administration in 2016, requested 9200 unmasking.

The Trump administration in 2019, requested 22,000 unmasking.

_____

Bull Shit. He heard about Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador and the old Fool was curious and wanted to read for himself. And he could be the one who then leaked it to the Washington Post--a Felony. He must sit for a Deposition under oath.

We have to investigate whether a person who might be President is a Felon who should by on Rikers Island instead of in the White House.

____
______

Crazy Joe's request came right before the leak to the Post.

Hmmmm..............................

Prove it.

 

[Nostra]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

Why are you afraid to see what his reason was? Obama's NSA was as corrupt as the rest of his lawless regime.

I know, Standard Trumpian answer. Everyone is conspiring.

You avoided the question............typical Dimwinger snowflake.

Typical Trump stupidity. I don't respond to crazy conspiracy theories. The NSA found his reasons for seeing the information sufficient. The NSA was not conspiring with anyone.

No conspiracy theory, just a straightforward question you seem unable to answer.

 

[Flash]

Creepy Joe is in some deep do-do now.

last election we almost had hillary not have security clearance (should have been revoked) to be president.

this year the left is putting up someone who at this point is facing 10 years behind bars.

yet the left continues to scream the right is the problem.

Biden isn’t facing 10 years behind bars.

The fact is that Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak made him a legitimate target for unmasking and is consistent with law and protocol.

It was not illegal and you’ll have a hard time identifying anyone knowledgeable about the subject say it was.

Creepy Joe has been caught lying and being part of the coup attempt against President Trump.

He has a lot of other baggage but this bullshit will insure that Trump will win by a landslide.

I suspect that after Trump is re-elected there will be some serious payback to all those assholes in the filthy Obama administration that that been screwing around with our Republic.

I hope Trump runs on that. Trump will lose in a landslide.

You are confused. The American people want to see the butt pirates that attempted the coup against the duly elected President be punished for their treason. Payback will get Trump a lot of votes.

The flipping of a traditional Democrat Congressional seat in Moon Bat California is a great indication of the coming landslide by Trump.

Biden is in deep do-do. As bad of a candidate as that filthy bitch Crooked Hillary bitch was this corrupt asshole demented clown Biden is worse. He is a joke.

 

[busybee01]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Who did the NSA work for at the time? Take a minute and think about it. Don't strain yourself!

I know. Another conspiracy. You need to be committed to a insane asylum.

 

[busybee01]

Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?

View attachment 335632

As there was NO LEGITIMATE REASON to unmask a US citizen this violated US law. Joe was complicit in the Coup D'eTat and he needs to be held accountable.. Amazing that Joe would allow himself to be drawn into illegal conduct.

Yes there was a LEGITIMATE REASON. Unmasking does not violate any US laws.

How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

It is also highly unusual for the names of the officials who requested the “unmasking” to be released.

Here’s what ‘unmasking’ means, the phrase used in the Michael Flynn controversy

The names of several Obama-era officials involved in the “unmasking” of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn were declassified this week — but the obscure term sen…

nypost.com

Also the article notes that Grenell's memo says the requests were approved through the normal NSA procedures. That means the NSA decided the requests were proper and the reasons were justified.

Let's see Crazy Joe's "reason" to unmask Flynn.

Doesn't matter. The NSA found his reason for knowing fit the criteria.

Why are you afraid to see what his reason was? Obama's NSA was as corrupt as the rest of his lawless regime.

I know, Standard Trumpian answer. Everyone is conspiring.

You avoided the question............typical Dimwinger snowflake.

Typical Trump stupidity. I don't respond to crazy conspiracy theories. The NSA found his reasons for seeing the information sufficient. The NSA was not conspiring with anyone.

No conspiracy theory, just a straightforward question you seem unable to answer.

Not when you make unfounded allegations It is up to you to prove a conspiracy. The answer is simple. There is no conspiracy.