Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,035
- 56,850
Happened on the same fucking day, Dummy. Jan 12.Crazy Joe's request came right before the leak to the Post._____He requested an unmasking of someone involved, in an intelligence report he received. No way to know who was being unmasked in the Intel report, until they are unmasked.Why Would Joe Biden Request the Unmasking of a Communication by General Flynn....at ANY TIME...let alone Eight (8) days before he leaves office as Vice President? See January 12th entry below. Any of you Fanatic Democrats TDSers want to explain that?
View attachment 335632
Unmasking is solely for the AUTHORIZED person requesting the unmasking and not for view by anyone else. In some cases the chief of staff of the executive may also see it or request it for the executive requesting an unmasking.
Unmasking is not guaranteed. A formal request is made by the authorized person and a national security person has to determine if the reason for the request is pertinent to understanding the intelligence report.
It is a common action for those who are authorized and cleared.
The Obama administration in 2016, requested 9200 unmasking.
The Trump administration in 2019, requested 22,000 unmasking.
Bull Shit. He heard about Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador and the old Fool was curious and wanted to read for himself. And he could be the one who then leaked it to the Washington Post--a Felony. He must sit for a Deposition under oath.
We have to investigate whether a person who might be President is a Felon who should by on Rikers Island instead of in the White House.
____
______
Hmmmm..............................
Prove it.
You really need a massive education on this topic, and the definition of "treason".
Biden Among Those Who Requested âUnmaskingâ Of Michael Flynn
The list includes such high-profile Obama administration officials as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former FBI Director James Comey.
www.forbes.com
Washington Post had 'divisions in the newsroom' over Flynn's Russia calls, before publishing opinion piece
A newly unearthed transcript indicates that The Washington Post’s newsroom was deeply divided over whether it was even worth reporting that incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was speaking to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December 2016 -- before the Post published details in...
www.foxnews.com