Will ANYONE in the government be held accountable for violations of the first amendment via Twitter?

[busybee01]

my platform is guaranteed by the first amendment, so is yours. This forum proves that. What twitter and the others did is a constitutional violation of law. Stop repeating the lies pumped into your head by your left wing masters--------------they are lying to you.

No it is not. Private companies are not bound by the 1st Amendment. Go back to school you ignorant idiot. Go tell that to IUSMB and see what they say.

 

[dblack]

As I figured. Guess you'll have to wait an eternity for one of the msm news outlets to become honest brokers of news

Or something in between. Seriously, you guys only ever have crackpot horseshit. The sad thing is - you're probably right about some of it. But for fuck's sake, stop leading with crazy. It's not helping anything. Try to find some normal sounding people to make your case. Alex Jones wannabes doesn't cut it.

 

[bripat9643]

The DHS warned companies about potential misinformation from Russian bots. They specified no specific story.

How does that make violating the Constitution OK?

 

[bripat9643]

No it is not. Private companies are not bound by the 1st Amendment. Go back to school you ignorant idiot. Go tell that to IUSMB and see what they say.

Private companies aren't, but the FBI is.

 

[busybee01]

BULLSHIT. you can say whatever you want whenever and wherever you want to say it. At the workplace it might get you fired or disciplined but no one can prevent you from saying it. And the first amendment does apply to news broadcasts and network talk shows. social media got a temporary exemption which never should have happened and will very likely be reversed by the next congress. The released twitter files prove the illegal censorship and bias.

The first amendment does not apply to news broadcasts or network talk shows. They are owned by private companies. The selectively released twitter files show no such thing.

 

[bripat9643]

The FBI is not telling anyone to silence anyone.

They sure as hell are.

 

[bripat9643]

The first amendment does not apply to news broadcasts or network talk shows. They are owned by private companies. The selectively released twitter files show no such thing.

So where does it give the FBI license to tell private companies who to censor?

 

[bripat9643]

The first amendment does not apply to news broadcasts or network talk shows. They are owned by private companies. The selectively released twitter files show no such thing.

That's exactly what they show, you fucking NAZI

 

[busybee01]

/——-/ Nothing, as long as that is all they do.

/———/ You can spin for the government only for so long But, I admire your tenacity. View attachment 740429

I don't have to spin anything. You are the ones spinning. No wonder you sound dizzy.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/—-

No it is not. Private companies are not bound by the 1st Amendment. Go back to school you ignorant idiot. Go tell that to IUSMB and see what they say.

/——-/ But it is a violation when the Gubmint does it. But, you already knew.

 

[busybee01]

How does that make violating the Constitution OK?

Because they didn't violate the Constitution. End of argument.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I don't have to spin anything. You are the ones spinning. No wonder you sound dizzy.

/——-/ Explain how this isn’t a viola of the 1st amendment

 

[bripat9643]

Because they didn't violate the Constitution. End of argument.

They obviously did, you brain dead goosestepping asshole NAZI

 

[busybee01]

Private companies aren't, but the FBI is.

The FBI did not violate the Constitution.

 

[Mac1958]

The first amendment does not apply to news broadcasts or network talk shows. They are owned by private companies. The selectively released twitter files show no such thing.

They don't care. They just want to be outraged.

 

[busybee01]

So where does it give the FBI license to tell private companies who to censor?

They never did.

 

[bripat9643]

The FBI did not violate the Constitution.

It sure as hell did. Telling privately owned companies to censor their customers is a clear violation of the First Amendment. Only a fucking NAZI would deny that.

 

[Cellblock2429]

You know this is fake, right? I guess it doesn't matter.

/——-/ Elon Musk is just making this all up? Is that what you’re running with today?

 

[busybee01]

They obviously did, you brain dead goosestepping asshole NAZI

You are the Nazi who is attacking the first amendment you filthy piece of Nazi garbage.

 

[bripat9643]

/——-/ Elon Musk is just making this all up? Is that what you’re running with today?

These goosesteppers have revealed their NAZI cloven hoof.