/——-/ Explain how this isn’t a viola of the 1st amendment View attachment 740434
The FBI does not run a social media site so they can censor no one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/——-/ Explain how this isn’t a viola of the 1st amendment View attachment 740434
NO, YOU'RE THE NAZI!You are the Nazi who is attacking the first amendment you filthy piece of Nazi garbage.
Then you aren't thinking.Twitter is a privately-owned company. It's not the government. This isn't a First Amendment issue.
Should a company -- especially a company that deals in freedom of expression -- fuck around with banning and shadow-banning and playing games? No, not in my estimation. Those are only band aids, and band aids usually make things worse. We just refuse to learn that one.
But this ain't a First Amendment issue.
Until Musk bought it, they ran twitter. They made all the editorial decisions.The FBI does not run a social media site so they can censor no one.
It sure as hell did. Telling privately owned companies to censor their customers is a clear violation of the First Amendment. Only a fucking NAZI would deny that.
It's frustrating. I agree with them, at least to some degree, on several things. But they're all running around like they're auditioning for a talk radio show, just tossing out the goofiest shit they can come up with, and then they all believe it. They're not even TRYING to be rational at this point, and they're backing absolute fucking clowns.Or something in between. Seriously, you guys only ever have crackpot horseshit. The sad thing is - you're probably right about some of it. But for fuck's sake, stop leading with crazy. It's not helping anything. Try to find some normal sounding people to make your case. Alex Jones wannabes doesn't cut it.
Until Musk bought it, they ran twitter. They made all the editorial decisions.
What a dumbfuck NAZI.
The NAZI bootlicker automatically defends the FBI. How beautifully liberal!They don't care. They just want to be outraged.
Demonstrate that this was done in an official capacity, or by an officer of the FBI, or in some organized way, and you'll have my attention.Then you aren't thinking.
Why?
Because, if true, the Twitter data dump 3 showed where the FBI had close to 100 agents pointing out tweets they wanted removed. Many of them Twitter removed. The person in charge of content had numerous emails back and forth from members of the FBI and the White House. And she literally said "I am looking forward to working with you".
THAT - is where it is a 1st Amendment issue. Particularly "abridge the freedom of speech".
Where the federal government is prohibited from taking action to limit speech.
Which is exactly what they did.
Then you aren't thinking.
Why?
Because, if true, the Twitter data dump 3 showed where the FBI had close to 100 agents pointing out tweets they wanted removed. Many of them Twitter removed. The person in charge of content had numerous emails back and forth from members of the FBI and the White House. And she literally said "I am looking forward to working with you".
THAT - is where it is a 1st Amendment issue. Particularly "abridge the freedom of speech".
Where the federal government is prohibited from taking action to limit speech.
Which is exactly what they did.
The NAZI bootlicker automatically defends the FBI. How beautifully liberal!
Twitter REPEATEDLY told the FBI they found NO FOREIGN SHIT that needed to be addressed.
THATS what's wrong with it.
Is that how you defend the Gestapo, by calling it "law enforcement?"You Nazis attack law enforcement. How Nazi-like.
Not until people that can't be bought are in government. Trump couldn't be bought; That's why they hate him so.
No they don't, NAZI. Twitter didn't say "no." Even if it did say "no," the First Amendment doesn't say government can violate Freedom of Speech some of the time.The FBI has the right to contact social media about their concerns. I have a right to contact them and express my concerns about posts. If twitter was being controlled by the FBI then how did twitter say no?
Oh puhleeze. You idiots can make up your mind whether Trump is going broke or getting rich off the presidency.Trump lined his pockets at the expense of taxpayers. He was buying people.
/——-/ Well, apparently you have no idea what happens when the FBI calls and tells a company to do something. But, It seems you’re just making excuses for them because you approve of their actions.The FBI does not run a social media site so they can censor no one.
Is that how you defend the Gestapo, by calling it "law enforcement?"
Oh puhleeze. You idiots can make up your mind whether Trump is going broke or getting rich off the presidency.
So you actually expect people to take you seriously?