Will Speaker Pelosi withhold articles of impeachment from Senate until guaranteed a fair trial?

[Nostra]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Actually, I disagree - because she will appoint House managers to argue/present the impeachment case before the Senate.

The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Then why must Speaker Pelosi appoint House managers to "manage the ensuring Senate trial on its behalf"? "These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee."

Good Lord, you really are dumb.

 

[Faun]

The Constitution no where states that the house votes to impeach. They vote to send it to Senate for Senate to make that decision. You guys are up at halftime but think that by stoping now you won. You are woefully lacking in competitive spirt and ability.

Dumbfucking conservative...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

You rightarded freaks have proved to be insanely ignorant and misguided. <smh>

The Senate 'SHALL HAVE SOLE POWER TO TRY ANY IMPEACHMENT".


Unless, and until, the House delivers their charges to the Senate to try, there is no impeachment ya fucking moron.

Credible proof?

Go read the Constitution for the first time, Troll.

Why? You already proved YOU don't understand the Constitution.

It states the House has sole power of Impeachment...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

... and the Constitution states the House makes up it's own rules ...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.​

... and the House rules state an individual is impeached when the articles of impeachment are adopted by the House...

​

That happened on 12.18.2019 yet here you are, moronically claiming none of that is true.

 

[Lakhota]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Actually, I disagree - because she will appoint House managers to argue/present the impeachment case before the Senate.

The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Then why must Speaker Pelosi appoint House managers to "manage the ensuring Senate trial on its behalf"? "These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee."

Good Lord, you really are dumb.

Then please explain it to us - with "credible proof". Just making up shit doesn't count.

 

[Faun]

The Constitution no where states that the house votes to impeach. They vote to send it to Senate for Senate to make that decision. You guys are up at halftime but think that by stoping now you won. You are woefully lacking in competitive spirt and ability.

Dumbfucking conservative...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

You rightarded freaks have proved to be insanely ignorant and misguided. <smh>

The Senate 'SHALL HAVE SOLE POWER TO TRY ANY IMPEACHMENT".


Unless, and until, the House delivers their charges to the Senate to try, there is no impeachment ya fucking moron.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, YOU said you believe the word of a Harvard professor... so I posted two Harvard Law professors... one of whom basically called Feldman an imbecile for opining Impeached Trump is not impeached.

I accept your concession..........again.

You lose.

Hisses the forum retard who says hd accepts the word of Harvard Law professors as an authority -- and then doesn't because he doesn't like what they say.

 

[Faun]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Then why is Nazi trying to dictate what the Senate does, Fuckwit?

Where does the Constitution say she can't try, dumbfuck??

Dayum, you're even more rightarded than most of the dumbfucks here.

You don't have even a lick of common sense.

 

[Lakhota]

• Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.

How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process

 

[WEATHER53]

Where we are right now with the word impeachment is the same as the word charges. Until there is a hearing and verdict, there has not been an impeachment even though impeachment charges were filed

 

[Faun]

Dumbfucking conservative...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

You rightarded freaks have proved to be insanely ignorant and misguided. <smh>

The fallacy of Pelosi’s action is that the Senate is incapable of having a fair hearing, yet there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that.

Oh? McConnell stating he's not impartial and will be working with the impeached president to acquit him is a fair trial to you?

4 Dimwinger Senators in the 2020 Clown Car already made up their minds..............and yet you give them a pass.

Your colossal hypocrisy renders anything you post unworthy of consideration.

I gave none a pass, Spunky. I said Senators who say they will not be impartial but swear to an oath of impartiality are violating their oath. I don't care which party they belong to.

Please link us up to your posts saying they need to recuse themselves. I'll wait.................

LOLOL

Why would I link to something I never asserted, Spunky.

I never once said any of them, Republican or Democrat, need to recuse themselves.

You're clearly suffering from delusions again.

 

[Faun]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Actually, I disagree - because she will appoint House managers to argue/present the impeachment case before the Senate.

The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Then why must Speaker Pelosi appoint House managers to "manage the ensuring Senate trial on its behalf"? "These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee."

Their role is to present the House's impeachment to the Senate. The Senate has sole power if the trial. They can even overrule the Chief Justice presiding over the trial because they have sole power.

 

[Faun]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Actually, I disagree - because she will appoint House managers to argue/present the impeachment case before the Senate.

The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

So you agree that lyingcunt Pelosi is obstructing Congress by failing to move the farce of an impeachment forward.

It's all just an abuse of power to alter and influence the 2020 election anyway.

She might be. But there's nothing actually in the Constitution establishing a timeframe for how quickly the House has to name managers or send articles of impeachment to the Senate.

 

[Faun]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Actually, I disagree - because she will appoint House managers to argue/present the impeachment case before the Senate.

The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Then why must Speaker Pelosi appoint House managers to "manage the ensuring Senate trial on its behalf"? "These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee."

Good Lord, you really are dumb.

LOLOL

Shits a retard who actually thinks Impeached Trump was not impeached.

 

[Faun]

Where we are right now with the word impeachment is the same as the word charges. Until there is a hearing and verdict, there has not been an impeachment even though impeachment charges were filed

LOLOL

What the fuck is wrong with you?? I swear, you cultists are absolutely brain-dead. :cymuckoo:

Dumbfuck.... Impeached Trump supporter, Nicolas Cruz, shot up a school in Parkland Florida, killing 17 and injuring 17 others. He was indicted on multiple charges related to that horrific shooting.

Nicolas Cruz has not gone to trial yet.

According to abject imbeciles like you, Nicolas Cruz was NOT indicted.

Are ya feeling stupid yet??

 

[Nostra]

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Actually, I disagree - because she will appoint House managers to argue/present the impeachment case before the Senate.

The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.

https://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Impeachment/

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Then why must Speaker Pelosi appoint House managers to "manage the ensuring Senate trial on its behalf"? "These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee."

Good Lord, you really are dumb.

Then please explain it to us - with "credible proof". Just making up shit doesn't count.

Already did. Read the Constitution.

 

[beagle9]

Who is he to say ? He will say as millions more follow and echoe him when Trump is elected president for his second term, and that is who he is to say. Any more questions ?

You realize whether Impeached Trump wins or loses the election, he's still impeached, right?

He's not impeached until the House presents the paperwork to the Senate. "Shall" is the keyword here.

That's what you say, but you're a retard.

The Constitution states the House makes it's own rules...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.​

And the Constitution states the House has "sole power" of impeachment...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

And the House rules indicate Impeached Trump was impeached on 12.18.2019 when the House adopted articles of impeachment against Impeached Trump...

​

No amount of bullshit you post can undo reality.

It also says "high crimes and misdomeaners", but the Democrat's ignored that part of it, and attempted the coup with their desperate bogus charges anyways. Talk about making a mockery of the constitution, good grief.

LOLOL

No, Democrats did not ignore "high crimes and misdemeanors." It's not Democrats' fault you're too ignorant to understand the meaning of that phrase.

That's what they hoped for, otherwise that the American people are complete fool's, but I got faith in the American people that they won't bite that apple, and haven't bitten that apple. Trump will be president again, and you can cash that check at any bank you want too.

 

[Nostra]

Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.

Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.

Then why is Nazi trying to dictate what the Senate does, Fuckwit?

Where does the Constitution say she can't try, dumbfuck??

Dayum, you're even more rightarded than most of the dumbfucks here.

You don't have even a lick of common sense.

The Separation Of Powers Clause you dumbfuck.

 

[beagle9]

House does not have power to impeach but rather to refer to Senate to see if they will impeach.

So Clinton wasn't impeached?? I didn't know that Thanks

He was referred for impeachment but the vote was no
With Trump no referral made, no vote taken; no impeachment. Different outcomes can have the same classification but that’s a fact thing and too much for snowflakes

Clinton was still impeached regardless of his acquittal.

That’s the ole Lib 101 that a not guilty verdict is not an innocent verdict therefore guilt still stains the party. More liberal made up bs for their feelings fantasy land

LOL

It'd not "Lib 101." It's the Constitution. It's just that Liberals understand it where sooo many conservatives cannot. The Constitution states impeachment occurs in the House, not in the Senate. The trial occurs in the Senate. And the outcome of the trial, regardless of what that is, does not mean an impeached individual is no longer impeached.

You are kidding right ? So you mean to tell me that we have a system that can say a man is guilty without him being able to defend himself in a trial ? He already said he wanted a trial, but the Democrats knowing that they railroaded Trump, want to control the outcome of the trial as so to keep the pressure on until the election. It's all political, and it's a perverse usage of our justice system in this country for political outcomes instead of justice. The Democrats stand as the violaters of this system currently, and everyone knows it.

 

[beagle9]

The Constitution no where states that the house votes to impeach. They vote to send it to Senate for Senate to make that decision. You guys are up at halftime but think that by stoping now you won. You are woefully lacking in competitive spirt and ability.

Dumbfucking conservative...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

You rightarded freaks have proved to be insanely ignorant and misguided. <smh>

The Senate 'SHALL HAVE SOLE POWER TO TRY ANY IMPEACHMENT".


Unless, and until, the House delivers their charges to the Senate to try, there is no impeachment ya fucking moron.

Credible proof?

Go read the Constitution for the first time, Troll.

Why? You already proved YOU don't understand the Constitution.

It states the House has sole power of Impeachment...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.​

... and the Constitution states the House makes up it's own rules ...

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.​

... and the House rules state an individual is impeached when the articles of impeachment are adopted by the House...

​

That happened on 12.18.2019 yet here you are, moronically claiming none of that is true.

Having the sole power of impeachment doesn't mean that they can impeach, and then it stops there. The proceedings have to complete and come to a conclusion by way in which it is laid out completely. The impeachment is just one part of it, and then it moves to the Senate where it states that the Senate has sole power to try the impeachment, and to render the verdict.

Not sure what point you are trying to make by saying the house has sole power of impeachment ..... Big deal, now let's finish the process by adding the rest of the process to the proceedings. Otherwise there is no impeachment.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Big deal, now let's finish the process by adding the rest of the process to the proceedings.

The Republicans held up the Garland nomination for nearly a year.

Pelosi can take all the time she needs. Let the orange turd twist in the wind for a while.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Speaker Pelosi will know when to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate.

Someone have a thermometer in hell to tell her when the temperature drops below 32 ?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Big deal, now let's finish the process by adding the rest of the process to the proceedings.

The Republicans held up the Garland nomination for nearly a year.

Pelosi can take all the time she needs. Let the orange turd twist in the wind for a while.

You guys really think he's worried ?