Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A fair trial is impossible. Even if McConnell let Pelosi have all the witnesses she wants, and even if McConnell never spoke to trump's legal team ever again, it still wouldnt be a fair trial. The reason for this is because democrats have already made up their minds. They are chomping at the bit to vote to remove trump.More words of proof that it's all politics, politically motivated, and a waste of American taxpayers dime. Y'all like playing games don't ya ? Regardless of the huge money it has cost, let the games continue eh ?The Republicans held up the Garland nomination for nearly a year.Big deal, now let's finish the process by adding the rest of the process to the proceedings.
Pelosi can take all the time she needs. Let the orange turd twist in the wind for a while.
I agree!
Well, we would just like a fair trial in the Senate - even if Trump* is acquitted.
Bing you win the truth prize. Exactly right.A fair trial is impossible. Even if McConnell let Pelosi have all the witnesses she wants, and even if McConnell never spoke to trump's legal team ever again, it still wouldnt be a fair trial. The reason for this is because democrats have already made up their minds. They are chomping at the bit to vote to remove trump.More words of proof that it's all politics, politically motivated, and a waste of American taxpayers dime. Y'all like playing games don't ya ? Regardless of the huge money it has cost, let the games continue eh ?The Republicans held up the Garland nomination for nearly a year.Big deal, now let's finish the process by adding the rest of the process to the proceedings.
Pelosi can take all the time she needs. Let the orange turd twist in the wind for a while.
I agree!
Well, we would just like a fair trial in the Senate - even if Trump* is acquitted.
A fair trial would only be possible if both sides were completely impartial, which neither side is impartial.
Then let all witnesses testify including the pos trumpA fair trial is impossible. Even if McConnell let Pelosi have all the witnesses she wants, and even if McConnell never spoke to trump's legal team ever again, it still wouldnt be a fair trial. The reason for this is because democrats have already made up their minds. They are chomping at the bit to vote to remove trump.More words of proof that it's all politics, politically motivated, and a waste of American taxpayers dime. Y'all like playing games don't ya ? Regardless of the huge money it has cost, let the games continue eh ?The Republicans held up the Garland nomination for nearly a year.Big deal, now let's finish the process by adding the rest of the process to the proceedings.
Pelosi can take all the time she needs. Let the orange turd twist in the wind for a while.
I agree!
Well, we would just like a fair trial in the Senate - even if Trump* is acquitted.
A fair trial would only be possible if both sides were completely impartial, which neither side is impartial.
LOLOLThe Separation Of Powers Clause you dumbfuck.Where does the Constitution say she can't try, dumbfuck??Then why is Nazi trying to dictate what the Senate does, Fuckwit?Of course she doesn't. She only has say in House matters.Nazi Pelousy has no say in what happens in the Senate. She is a delusional dictator wannabe.
Dayum, you're even more rightarded than most of the dumbfucks here.
You don't have even a lick of common sense.
You talkin' about this, schmuck?
Separation of powers
Separation of powers is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) are kept separate. This is also known as the system of checks and balances, because each branch is given certain powers so as to check and balance the other branches.
Each branch has separate powers, and generally each branch is not allowed to exercise the powers of the other branches.
That applies to our three branches of government, not our bicameral legislature of the Congress.
Here, this is for your edification. It's about at your level. Maybe even a little too advanced for ya...
The other thing is that the charges are bogus, so Trump would be a fool to get trapped into that trap.Then let all witnesses testify including the pos trumpA fair trial is impossible. Even if McConnell let Pelosi have all the witnesses she wants, and even if McConnell never spoke to trump's legal team ever again, it still wouldnt be a fair trial. The reason for this is because democrats have already made up their minds. They are chomping at the bit to vote to remove trump.More words of proof that it's all politics, politically motivated, and a waste of American taxpayers dime. Y'all like playing games don't ya ? Regardless of the huge money it has cost, let the games continue eh ?The Republicans held up the Garland nomination for nearly a year.
Pelosi can take all the time she needs. Let the orange turd twist in the wind for a while.
I agree!
Well, we would just like a fair trial in the Senate - even if Trump* is acquitted.
A fair trial would only be possible if both sides were completely impartial, which neither side is impartial.
FDR used to get along with Stalin, why shouldn't Trump get along with Dems?Are Stalinist democrats "impartial"?
You know, I used to be of that thought as well, that impeachment happened as soon as the house adopted the resolution. However, lately it has me wondering, because that school of thought comes with some complications.Why? You already proved YOU don't understand the Constitution.Go read the Constitution for the first time, Troll.The Senate 'SHALL HAVE SOLE POWER TO TRY ANY IMPEACHMENT".Dumbfucking conservative...The Constitution no where states that the house votes to impeach. They vote to send it to Senate for Senate to make that decision. You guys are up at halftime but think that by stoping now you won. You are woefully lacking in competitive spirt and ability.
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
You rightarded freaks have proved to be insanely ignorant and misguided. <smh>
Unless, and until, the House delivers their charges to the Senate to try, there is no impeachment ya fucking moron.
Credible proof?
It states the House has sole power of Impeachment...
The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
... and the Constitution states the House makes up it's own rules ...
Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.
... and the House rules state an individual is impeached when the articles of impeachment are adopted by the House...
That happened on 12.18.2019 yet here you are, moronically claiming none of that is true.
FDR worked for StalinFDR used to get along with Stalin, why shouldn't Trump get along with Dems?Are Stalinist democrats "impartial"?
i havent studied that era yet. Bret Baier of FOX News has written about it...FDR worked for StalinFDR used to get along with Stalin, why shouldn't Trump get along with Dems?Are Stalinist democrats "impartial"?
johnson is the horses ass"Sen. Ron Johnson says charges against Pres. Trump are "pretty thin gruel" and Speaker Nancy Pelosi's decision to withhold the articles of impeachment is "bizarre." "They had to rush to this impeachment vote and then all of a sudden she's sitting on it.""
and the pos is in putins pocketFDR worked for StalinFDR used to get along with Stalin, why shouldn't Trump get along with Dems?Are Stalinist democrats "impartial"?
Pelosi is a goddamn horse's ass!johnson is the horses ass"Sen. Ron Johnson says charges against Pres. Trump are "pretty thin gruel" and Speaker Nancy Pelosi's decision to withhold the articles of impeachment is "bizarre." "They had to rush to this impeachment vote and then all of a sudden she's sitting on it.""
From your article:How does impeachment work? Here is the step-by-step process
- Members of the House serve as “managers” in the Senate trial. Managers serve a similar role as prosecutors do in a criminal trial, they present evidence during the procedure.
Impeachment was established by the framers of the Constitution as a way to accuse a president of a crime and to hold a trial to determine if he is guilty of that crime.
The Constitution lays out two specific actions, treason and bribery, that could lead to impeachment and removal of a president from office.
The system also allows for a broader category to accuse a president of crime, although that category is more vague.
A president can also be charged with and found guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” What exactly constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors is not defined in the Constitution, making impeachment on that basis more difficult.
The procedure then moves to the Senate where a “trial” is held to determine if the president committed a crime. There is no set procedure for the trial. How it is conducted would be set by the Senate leadership.
He MUST be a relative of yours...........johnson is the horses ass"Sen. Ron Johnson says charges against Pres. Trump are "pretty thin gruel" and Speaker Nancy Pelosi's decision to withhold the articles of impeachment is "bizarre." "They had to rush to this impeachment vote and then all of a sudden she's sitting on it.""
Maybe but she sure has the prick Trump dancing to her tunePelosi is a goddamn horse's ass!johnson is the horses ass"Sen. Ron Johnson says charges against Pres. Trump are "pretty thin gruel" and Speaker Nancy Pelosi's decision to withhold the articles of impeachment is "bizarre." "They had to rush to this impeachment vote and then all of a sudden she's sitting on it.""
25 million for fraud in Trump U and 2 million for fraud with his bs charity and you assholes still kiss the crooks ass???Absolutely correct that Trump has merely been accused. The senate decides if he’s impeached
