R
rdean
Guest
If Democrats are socialist for wanting Americans to help other Americans, what do you call the "let him die" and "feed the poor and they will breed" Republicans? Fascists? Plutocrats? Evil?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He used the term "socialism" to refer to German fascism.He used the term socialism , there is no ambiguity in that. I presented to you his words pertaining to fascism and there was no ambiguity in those either. He did not use the terms interchangeably.We weren't talking about norms, you were specific in your accusations and you failed to back it up.The passage that you quoted was from "Omnipotent Government" under the heading "Socialism in Russia and in Germany". He was not discussing fascism, you are making that up.He explained that fascism is just socialism in disguise. The rest of the passage didn't change the meaning of what I quoted.
Obviously, you're illiterate.
ROFL! People normally class Nazism as a form of fascism, numskull.
Wrong . . . I did back it up. When Mises refers to "the German pattern" he means Nazism, i.e. fascism. He said in very plain language that it's just another form of socialism.
Whenever I think of Socialists, I always remember their love of big, happy, white families, just like Adolf...
Socialists always pay you to have four or more children right?
Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.-Wait a minute now, maybe there is a distinction between fascism/crony capitalism and socialism. Socialism is when government owns business rather than just controlling it. That would lead me to infer that we are not socialist but instead fascist
Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Crony capitalism is as it's name suggests, capitalists creating favorable conditions for profit generation. It has nothing in common with socialism or fascism, two distinctly different ideologies, and concepts which you have clearly shown to be ignorant of.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.-Wait a minute now, maybe there is a distinction between fascism/crony capitalism and socialism. Socialism is when government owns business rather than just controlling it. That would lead me to infer that we are not socialist but instead fascist
Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Crony capitalism is as it's name suggests, capitalists creating favorable conditions for profit generation. It has nothing in common with socialism or fascism, two distinctly different ideologies, and concepts which you have clearly shown to be ignorant of.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.citation?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.-Wait a minute now, maybe there is a distinction between fascism/crony capitalism and socialism. Socialism is when government owns business rather than just controlling it. That would lead me to infer that we are not socialist but instead fascist
Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Crony capitalism is as it's name suggests, capitalists creating favorable conditions for profit generation. It has nothing in common with socialism or fascism, two distinctly different ideologies, and concepts which you have clearly shown to be ignorant of.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.
Well if you need government to do the job ... I am not going to argue with that.
I mean why argue with Santa Clause ... Just wait by the fireplace for Ole St. Nick to come rolling down the chimney with a bag of toys for all the good little boys and girls in the world.
But ... That isn't what I posted ... And doesn't address "their goals" (in reference to Capitalism).
My point is whether or not Capitalism can accomplish "their goals" and how it would be more productive and efficient if and when Capitalists adjust "their goals" to meet greater needs.
It is really kind of funny when people bitch about Capitalists ... Because of what they can actually accomplish.
.
We're going around in a circle, what do capitalists actually accomplish?
However you want to smear Republicans, the fact remains the Democrats are socialists.If Democrats are socialist for wanting Americans to help other Americans, what do you call the "let him die" and "feed the poor and they will breed" Republicans? Fascists? Plutocrats? Evil?
Whenever I think of Socialists, I always remember their love of big, happy, white families, just like Adolf...
Socialists always pay you to have four or more children right?
Well if you need government to do the job ... I am not going to argue with that.
I mean why argue with Santa Clause ... Just wait by the fireplace for Ole St. Nick to come rolling down the chimney with a bag of toys for all the good little boys and girls in the world.
But ... That isn't what I posted ... And doesn't address "their goals" (in reference to Capitalism).
My point is whether or not Capitalism can accomplish "their goals" and how it would be more productive and efficient if and when Capitalists adjust "their goals" to meet greater needs.
It is really kind of funny when people bitch about Capitalists ... Because of what they can actually accomplish.
.
We're going around in a circle, what do capitalists actually accomplish?
Are you really that stupid or just being disingenuous?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.-Wait a minute now, maybe there is a distinction between fascism/crony capitalism and socialism. Socialism is when government owns business rather than just controlling it. That would lead me to infer that we are not socialist but instead fascist
Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Crony capitalism is as it's name suggests, capitalists creating favorable conditions for profit generation. It has nothing in common with socialism or fascism, two distinctly different ideologies, and concepts which you have clearly shown to be ignorant of.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.citation?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.-Wait a minute now, maybe there is a distinction between fascism/crony capitalism and socialism. Socialism is when government owns business rather than just controlling it. That would lead me to infer that we are not socialist but instead fascist
Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Crony capitalism is as it's name suggests, capitalists creating favorable conditions for profit generation. It has nothing in common with socialism or fascism, two distinctly different ideologies, and concepts which you have clearly shown to be ignorant of.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.
Now that's funny, you don't know what Nazi stands for.
It's an acronym for National Socialist Workers Party. I can't believe you asked that, it's hilarious
We're going around in a circle, what do capitalists actually accomplish?
Uh ... Well then I guess we can stop going in circles ... If Capitalist cannot accomplish anything ... Then you don't have anything to bitch about.
See how easy that is ... Either they do or they don't ... Your opinion of whatever they may or may not accomplish doesn't change that.
.
Now that's funny, you don't know what Nazi stands for.
It's an acronym for National Socialist Workers Party. I can't believe you asked that, it's hilarious
And this: Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea of course)Now that's funny, you don't know what Nazi stands for.
It's an acronym for National Socialist Workers Party. I can't believe you asked that, it's hilarious
Indeed, almost as funny as Saddam's republican guard
Are you really that stupid or just being disingenuous?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.citation?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.Exactly, Holmes. Both parties are fascist.
Sorry, guy, you don't get to make up your own definition for words
– Ludwig von Mises, Human ActionXXVII. THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MARKET I. The Idea of a Third System P RIVATE ownership of the means of production (market economy or capitalism) and public ownership of the means of production (socialism or communism or "planning") can be neatly distinguished. Each of these two systems of society's econonlic organization is open to a precise and unambiguous description and definition. They can never be confounded with one another; they cannot be mixid or combined; no gradual transition leads from one of thcm to the other; their obversion is contradictory. With regard to the same factors of production there can only exist private control or public control. If in the frame of a system of social cooperation only some means of production are subject to public ownership while the rest are controlled by privatc individuals, this does not make for a mixed system combining socialism and private ownership. The system remains a market society, provided the socialized sector does not become entirely separated from the non-socialized sector and Iead a strictly autarkic existence. (In this latter case there are two systems independently coexisting side by side-a capitalist and a socialist.) Publicly owned enterprises, operating within a system in which there are privatcly owned enterprises and a market, and socialized countries, exchanging goods and services with nonsocialist countries, are integrated into a system of market economy. They are subject to the law of the market and have the opportunity of resorting to economic cal~ulation.~
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.
Now that's funny, you don't know what Nazi stands for.
It's an acronym for National Socialist Workers Party. I can't believe you asked that, it's hilarious
Now that's funny, you don't know what Nazi stands for.
It's an acronym for National Socialist Workers Party. I can't believe you asked that, it's hilarious
Indeed, almost as funny as Saddam's republican guard
Highlight where I asked what Nazi stands for.Are you really that stupid or just being disingenuous?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.
– Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.citation?Redefining words seems to be your talent. I'm using historical definitions for words, you are redefining them to suit your agenda.
– Ludwig von Mises, Human Action
Mises said fascism is a form of socialism.
Now that's funny, you don't know what Nazi stands for.
It's an acronym for National Socialist Workers Party. I can't believe you asked that, it's hilarious
Seriously dude, you are on the Internet. That you couldn't look up Nazi yourself was pathetic, but then when I told you, you call me stupid and/or a liar. Here you go, dumb ass
What does Nazi mean in German - Quora
The fullname of the political party was the "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei" - the National Socialist German Worker's Party.
Uh ... Well then I guess we can stop going in circles ... If Capitalist cannot accomplish anything ... Then you don't have anything to bitch about.
See how easy that is ... Either they do or they don't ... Your opinion of whatever they may or may not accomplish doesn't change that..
What have capitalists actually accomplished?
Telephone
Telegraph
Radio
Railroad
automobile
television
computers
cell phones
electric lights
electric motors
refrigeration
air conditioning
Open heart surgery
anaesthesia
tractor
combine
chemical fertilizers
Pesticides
DDT
Cheap cotton textiles
explosives
reinforced concrete
cheap mass produced steel
The assembly line
robots
The highest standard of living in the world
The end of mass starvation.
You don't know what republican means any more than you know what capitalism is