- Apr 21, 2010
- 98,544
- 59,704
As would the majority of Americans. That's one reason why big tech needs to destroyed. They are trying to control the release of information so that they are the sole source.
Do you agree with that?
Do I agree that big tech needs to be destroyed? Not at all.
Oh? You agree that they should be able to censor information?
I thought you wanted people to be better informed. Your support of big tech is contrary to your stated goal.
I think businesses should be able to conduct themselves how they want within the boundaries of the law. If you don't like their policy, then go somewhere else.
They are violating the law. They have used a law that protects content providers from lawsuit, but have changed into publishers while still claiming protection from that law.
That is wrong on all counts. Either they return to being merely a platform, or they revert to being publishers, or they get broken up. Choose one of the three options.
Then it's up to the courts to decide if they are in violation of the law.
What happens when they use their vast wealth to buy those judges? Not mention the politicians who write the laws?
At what point are their business practices best described as fascist?
Is there any evidence that they are using their vast wealth to buy judges? Or are you just making that up?
Judges, no, not yet. But there is ample evidence of the politicians they have bought.
Ok. So you don't have evidence that judges are being bought.
Sounds like some interesting fiction but not based in reality.
The bought politicians ARE a reality, and not fiction. It doesn't take a tiny leap to find judges who are bought. They get found out every year.