paperview
Life is Good
Personally, I think a whooooole lot of faith is being entrusted to that one 80 year old twitching like a caught carp woman of a single democrat who vouched, but -- I am in no position to say how loyal she is to the party. Or how honest or dishonest she is.
I don't think any of us are.
That is funny, because my first thought was that she probably doesn't even know how to turn on a computer let alone create a simple formula on a spreadsheet.
Immie
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
She looked like programming a Mr. Coffee machine would have confused her for days.
But...as I said, none of us know.
This is what bugs me a whole lot:
The news reports from the day in the county in question noted it "doesn't seem to be that busy."
>>>>"In Waukesha, which, unlike many of the state's other large cities, does not have a contested county executive race on the ballot, Deputy Clerk Gina Kozlik said returns are high in a contested city aldermanic district, but "everything else doesn't seem to be that busy."
>>>>>20-25% Turnout.
Other real time reports (I read them earlier but can't locate them now)
from that county said turnout was not that high throughout the day. Nothing special. There were no other major races, and first hand accounts of lined-up voters or anything like that...like we had in other counties where it was high.
Then, amazingly we learn the turnout was a whopping 48% (that's stunning) - with the newfound votes that is.
I'm still not making any charges. It could very well be legit, but something is smelly here.
Last edited: