Some Guy
Deregulated User
- Jan 19, 2010
- 2,437
- 426
- 130
Making thoughts into punishable crimes is the way of any authoritarian who wants to control how you live, how you think and how you act.I've read this whole thread.
What it comes down to for those who are opposed to this legislation is that it's already illegal to kill someone. Which it is.
I remember when hate crimes legislation was trying to get through the congress. The same excuses to not pass those bills were used then too.
The bills finally passed. Now it seems everyone accepts them as the law and don't have a problem with them.
It's weird to see things repeat themselves very needlessly.
I've been a registered Independent since 1978. I voted yes to pass the legislation.
We already make distinctions in killing people in our laws. There's murder one, murder two. There's manslaughter. There's defending your life. There's accidental killing that had nothing nefarious to do with the death so no one is charged. There's vehicular homicide.
Personally, I think that lynching as a hate crime should be added to that list. Motive is one of the components to murder that the prosecution must establish. Hate is a motive.
If it's not going to have any impact because lynchings don't happen anymore, what's the harm of passing that bill?
It's intellectually dishonest and will give the impression to the dumber portion of society thats it's an actual problem?
What's dishonest about making hate being the motive for lynching illegal?
If people are too stupid to know that it is very rare in our society now then passing or not passing a bill will make no difference with their laziness and stupidity.
You're going to make a crime out of thoughts and emotions? Shades of George Orwell.
If people are too stupid to know that you're just as dead regardless of what your murderer was thinking while he killed you, they don't need to be deciding on legislative priorities.