And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country?
Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.
Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...
The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....
Why didn't we take that approach?
Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.
Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...
The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....
Why didn't we take that approach?
Last edited: