ShaklesOfBigGov
Restore the Republic
I can't argue with those too blind to see ,,too blind to see that a repub, gwb got us into an unnecessary war a war that cost us so much..and I'm sick and tired of repubs trying to shift the blame for that calamityI don't give a damn what they believed or didn't ..BUSH attacked iraq under false pretenses he wanted a war and got what he wantedMost all of his weapons were old unusable given to him by America And bush ordered inspectors out after NOT FINDING anything Clinton was wrong and so was hillary BUT bush was the liar in chief with his hands on the trigger AND if you think that war was a necessary one you belong with SaddamFor those that insist on blaming President George W Bush for the war in Iraq, believing he must have somehow "misled" the Democrats and the people, they really haven't bothered to do any research on the subject.
Text Of Clinton Statement On Iraq
Text of President Clinton's address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff:
Saddam has spent the better part of the past decade trying to cheat on this solemn commitment. Consider just some of the facts:
(1) Iraq repeatedly made false declarations about the weapons that it had left in its possession after the Gulf War. When UNSCOM would then uncover evidence that gave lie to those declarations, Iraq would simply amend the reports.
(2) In 1995, Hussein Kamal, Saddam's son-in-law, and the chief organizer of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program, defected to Jordan. He revealed that Iraq was continuing to conceal weapons and missiles and the capacity to build many more.
(3) It admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability notably 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs.
(4) The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons.
If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program. We want to seriously reduce his capacity to threaten his neighbors.
I am quite confident, from the briefing I have just received from our military leaders, that we can achieve the objective and secure our vital strategic interests.
Let me be clear: A military operation cannot destroy all the weapons of mass destruction capacity. But it can and will leave him significantly worse off than he is now in terms of the ability to threaten the world with these weapons or to attack his neighbors.
SOURCE:
Text Of Clinton Statement On Iraq - February 17, 1998
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical- and biological-weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members."
Senator Hillary Clinton 2002
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of [WMD] technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Nancy Pelosi, a member of the House Intelligence Committee
"We know that [Saddam] has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
"Iraq’s search for [WMD] has proven impossible to deter, and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore 2002
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 -
Declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government.
Signed by President Bill Clinton
SOURCE
H.R.4655 - 105th Congress (1997-1998): Iraq Liberation Act of 1998
Quit trying to blame Bush for what President Clinton believed, what Hillary Clinton, and Al Gore said in 2002, and what the UN inspectors have reason to believe. Obviously you didn't do your homework and got called out on it.
PARTICULARLY with regard to President Clinton and regime change.
Well Bush said Saddam had WMDs, President Clinton had WMDs, President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act for regime change. There is NO false pretenses based on the preconceived notions and "facts" of both the Democrats and Republicans. You're making baseless opinions with any means to back them up, and using your hatred of Bush to make yourself look like an idiot.
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Last edited: